Cuando la frontera pasa por el centrocrítica del discurso consensualista sobre la polarización

  1. Javier Franzé 1
  2. Julián Melo 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de San Martín
    info

    Universidad Nacional de San Martín

    Tarapoto, Perú

    ROR https://ror.org/02h7fsz12

Revista:
Más poder local

ISSN: 2172-0223

Ano de publicación: 2022

Título do exemplar: Los discursos de los extremos

Número: 49

Páxinas: 78-96

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Más poder local

Resumo

This article asks if polarization is contrary to democracy and pluralism. The dominant discourse, which associates democracy with consensus, links polarization with division, instability and the destruction of democracy. As an example of this, this hegemonic discourse points out various experiences and recent political currents, from Trump to Maduro, passing through Orbán, Putin and Evo Morales. Critically reviewing the presuppositions of this perspective, elaborated by political scientists such as Sartori or Dahl, and starting from another concept of politics, based on conflict, we argue that polarization is not necessarily synonymous of antagonism, nor of the impairment of pluralism and democracy.