Desarrollos recientes en eficiencia y productividad para su aplicación en el sector público

  1. Daniel SANTÍN GONZÁLEZ 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Papeles de economía española

ISSN: 0210-9107

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 172

Páginas: 43-56

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles de economía española

Resumen

The aim of this paper is introducing some methodology research lines for evaluating the efficiency and productivity of public services. To do this, I review the advantages of performing benchmarking using frontier methods together with three recent methodological developments; meta-frontiers and the use of reference technologies, causal evaluations of public programs to improve efficiency and the potential gains from merging units inside an industry providing the same service. It is concluded that to start this evaluation task it would be necessary to create Independent Evaluation Agencies at Autonomous Community level for those services in which the Autonomous Community has transferred powers

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AIREF (2017). I Plan de Acción de la revisión del gasto en subvenciones del conjunto de las Administraciones Públicas. (Spending Review).
  • AIREF (2018). Informe de evaluación de la Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos, y la prestación del servicio postal universal.
  • Álvarez, A. (Coord.) (2001). La medición de la eficiencia y la productividad. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
  • Aparicio, J., Ortiz, L. y Santín, D. (2021). Comparing group performance over time through the Luenberger productivity indicator: An application to school ownership in European countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(2), pp. 651-672.
  • Aparicio, J. y Santín, D. (2018). A note on measuring group performance over time with pseudo-panels. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), pp. 227-235.
  • Battese, G. E. y Rao, D. P. (2002). Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), pp. 87-93.
  • Berg, S. A., Førsund, F. R. y Jansen, E. S. (1992). Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking, 1980-89. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, S211-S228.
  • Bogetoft, P. y Otto, L. (2010). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R (Vol. 157). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Bogetoft, P. y Wan g, D. (2005). Estimating the potential gains from mergers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(2), pp. 145-171.
  • Camanho, A. S. y Dyson, R. G. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and Malmquist indices for measuring group performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(1), pp. 35-49.
  • Caves, D., Christensen, L. y Diewert, W. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and th measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), pp. 1393-1414.
  • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’donnell, C. J. y Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Colegio de Economistas de Madrid (2005). La eficiencia de los servicios públicos: viejos problemas, nuevos enfoques. Revista Economistas, 105. Madrid: Colegio de Economistas de Madrid.
  • Cordero, J. M., Pedraja-Chaparro, F. M. y Suárez Pandiello, J. (2022). Estudio sobre organización territorial municipal en la provincia de Badajoz. Mimeo. Recuperado de: https:// www.donbenito.es/wp-content/ uploads/2022/01/INFORME-FINALCON-RESUMEN-EJECUTIVOESTUDIO-DE-ORGANIZACIONTERRITORIAL-PEDRAJA-PANDIELLO. pdf
  • Cordero, J. M., Santín, D. y Simancas, R. (2017). Assessing European primary school performance through a conditional nonparametric model. Journal of Operational Research Society, 68(4), pp. 364-376.
  • Daraio, C. y Simar, L. (2007). Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(1), pp.13-32.
  • De la Fuente, Á. (Coord.) (2021). La evaluación de políticas públicas en España: antecedentes, situación actual y propuestas para una reforma. Fedea Policy Papers, 2021- 09. Fedea.
  • Espasa, M. y Esteller-More, A. (2015). Analyzing judicial courts » performance: inefficiency vs. congestion. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 23(69), pp. 61-82.
  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), pp. 253-281.
  • Feliciano, D., López-Torres, L. y Santín, D. (2021). One Laptop per Child? Using Production Frontiers for Evaluating the Escuela 2.0 Program in Spain. Mathematics, 9(20), 2600.
  • Ferreira, D. y Marqués, R. C. (2015). Did the corporatization of Portuguese hospitals significantly change their productivity? The European Journal of Health Economics, 16(3), pp. 289-303.
  • Ferreira, D. C., Marques, R. C. y Pedro, M. I. (2016). Comparing efficiency of holding business model and individual management model of airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 57, pp.168-183.
  • Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. K. y Schmidt, S. S. (Eds.). (2008). The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press.
  • Funcas (2003). Sector público y eficiencia. Papeles de Economía Española, 95. Madrid: Funcas.
  • Giménez, V., Thieme, C., Prior, D. y TortosaAusina, E. (2017). An international comparison of educational systems: a temporal analysis in presence of bad outputs. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47(1), pp. 83-101.
  • Giménez, V., Thieme, C., Prior, D. y TortosaAusina, E. (2019). Comparing the performance of national educational systems: inequality versus achievement? Social Indicators Research, 141(2), pp. 581-609.
  • Johnson, A. L. y Kuosmanen, T. (2011). One-stage estimation of the effects of operational conditions and practices on productive performance: asymptotically normal and efficient, root-n consistent StoNEZD method. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), pp. 219- 230.
  • Kumbhakar, S. C., Wang, H. y Horncastle, A. P. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. Cambridge University Press.
  • Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. «X-efficiency». The American Economic Review, 56(3), pp. 392- 415.
  • Levin, H. M. (1974). Measuring efficiency in educational production. Public Finance Quarterly, 2(1), pp. 3-24.
  • Levin, H. M., Jamison, D. T. y Radner, R. (1976). Concepts of economic efficiency and educational production. Education as an Industry, pp. 149-198. NBER.
  • Mas-Colell , A., Whinston, M. D. y Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mergoni, A. y De Witte, K. (2022). Policy evaluation and efficiency: a systematic literature review. International Transactions in Operational Research, 29(3), pp. 1337-1359.
  • MEFP (2021). Anuario estadístico: Las cifras de la educación en España. Edición 2021 (Curso 2018-2019). Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional.
  • Ministerio de Sanidad (2021). Informe Anual del Sistema Nacional de Salud 2019. Aspectos destacados. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad.
  • Narbón-Perpiñá, I. y De Witte, K. (2018a). Local governments» efficiency: a systematic literature review – part I. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), pp. 431-468.
  • Narbón-Perpiñá, I. y De Witte, K. (2018b). Local governments» efficiency: a systematic literature review – part II. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(4), pp. 1107-1136.
  • Niskanen, W. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. The Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3), pp. 617-643.
  • Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), pp. 1120-1149.
  • Oh, D. H. (2010). A global MalmquistL u e n b e r g e r p r o d u c t i v i t y index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(3), pp. 183-197.
  • Pastor, J. T. y Lovell, C. K. (2005). A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 88(2), pp. 266-271.
  • Pedraja-Chaparro, F. M., Salinas-Jiménez, J. y Smith, P. (1999). On the quality of the data envelopment analysis model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(6), pp. 636- 644.
  • Santín, D. Y Sicilia, G. (2017). Impact evaluation and frontier methods in education: a step forward. En: G. Johnes, J. Johnes, T. Agasisti y L. López-Torres (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Education Economics. C heltelham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • SCRGSP, Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (2013). Report on Government Services 2013. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
  • Sickles, R. C. y Zelenyuk, V. (2019). Measurement of productivity and efficiency. Cambridge University Press.
  • Simar, L. y Wilson, P. W. (2011). Twostage DEA: caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), pp. 205-218.
  • Tirole, J. (1994). The internal organization of government. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, pp. 1-29.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet