Revisión de la literatura sobre la evidencia disponible actualmente para el manejo de las queratitis infecciosas con PACK-CXL

  1. S.M. Hamida Abdelkader 1
  2. M. Rodríguez Calvo-de-Mora 2
  3. J.A. Gegúndez-Fernández 3
  4. F.L. Soler-Ferrández 7
  5. C. Rocha-de-Lossada 456
  1. 1 Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas de Almería
    info

    Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas de Almería

    Almería, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04v91tb50

  2. 2 Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
    info

    Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01mqsmm97

  3. 3 Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid
    info

    Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04d0ybj29

  4. 4 Hospital Vithas Vírgen del Mar, Almería, España
  5. 5 Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
    info

    Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f01mz90

  6. 6 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  7. 7 Innova Ocular Clínica Dr. Soler, Elche, Alicante, España
Journal:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 97

Issue: 8

Pages: 464-472

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.OFTAL.2022.02.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Abstract

Infectious keratitis (IK) is one of the most common causes of monocular blindness worldwide, especially in developing countries, and may account for 5.1 to 32.3% of all indications for penetrating keratoplasty (PK). However, performing a therapeutic PK on a “hot eye” is associated with a higher incidence of IK recurrence and graft rejection. Standard treatment includes antimicrobials (ATM) and, once the causative pathogen has been identified, must be continued with targeted treatment, depending on antibiogram sensitivity. However, appearance of multiresistant strains to ATM is progressively increasing at an alarming rate. Besides that, the diversity of the causative microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses) may hinder the clinical diagnosis and secondarily the proper treatment from the beginning. It is estimated that only 50% of eyes will have a good visual result if the correct therapy is delayed. All these factors make the identification of alternatives to ATM treatment of paramount importance. Due to the ATM properties of photoactivated chromophore (riboflavin) and ultraviolet light of wavelength 200-400 nm, used in multiple medical and non-medical applications for disinfection, photoactivated chromophore for corneal cross-linking (CXL) of IK, as an addition to the therapeutic arsenal for the management of IK has been proposed. It must be differentiated from CXL used for the management of progressive keratoconus. The objective of this review is to update the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of photoactivated chromophore for corneal CXL in IKs