Asequibilidad y calidad de la atención reproductiva transfronteriza en las agencias mediadoras de gestación por sustitución en España

  1. Martínez Sánchez, Wilfrid Antonio 1
  2. Jareño Ruiz, Diana 1
  3. Gracia Soriano, Pablo de 2
  4. Navalón Mira, Alba 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Alicante, España
  2. 2 Universidad de Alicante y Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España
Revista:
Investigación y desarrollo: revista del Centro de Investigaciones en Desarrollo Humano

ISSN: 0121-3261,  2011-7574

Ano de publicación: 2021

Título do exemplar: "Sociología de las organizaciones y la comunicación: Cambios disruptivos en la comunicación y la sociedad"

Volume: 29

Número: 1

Páxinas: 155-177

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.14482/INDES.29.1.306.87 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Investigación y desarrollo: revista del Centro de Investigaciones en Desarrollo Humano

Resumo

Substitution pregnancy contributes to the transformation of social conceptions of filiation and changes in the reproductive strategies of families. This contribution relates the theory of cross-border reproductive care with post-modern theories of family life in order to explore which themes, elements and contents are used by intermediary surrogate pregnancy agencies which target Spanish mothers and fathers. The qualitative methodology and the technique of thematic content analysis after registration of the online information collected from the agencies is used. The results show the role of these intermediary agencies in the process of gestation by substitution in Spain, as well as generating knowledge in the area of new family forms constituted by assisted reproduction techniques.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alberdi, I. (1999): La nueva familia española. Taurus.
  • Alberdi, I y Escario, P (2007). Los hombres jóvenes y la paternidad. Fundación BBVA.
  • Alleman, B. W., Luger, T., Reisinger, H. S., Martin, R., Horowitz, M. D. y Cram, P. (2011). Medical tourism services available to residents of the United States. Journal of general internal medicine, 26(5), 492-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1582-8
  • Ayuso, L. S. (2019). Nuevas imágenes del cambio familiar en España. Revista Española de Sociología, 28(2), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2018.72
  • Ayuso, L. y Meil, G. (2015). Los cambios en la cultura familiar. En C. Torres Albero (Ed.), España 2015. Situación social (pp. 293-301). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Berend, Z. (2016). The Online World of Surrogacy. Berghahn.
  • Carone, N., Baiocco, R. y Lingiardi, V. (2017). Single fathers by choice using surrogacy: why men decide to have a child as a single parent. Human Reproduction, 32(9), 1871-1879. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex245
  • Castro, T. y Meil, G. (2015). Nuevas familias para un nuevo siglo. En C. Torres Albero (Ed.). España 2015. Situación social (pp. #-#). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Cea D’ Ancona, Ma A. (2007). La deriva del cambio familiar; hacia formas de convivencia más abiertas y democráticas. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Chee, H. L., Whittaker, A. y Por, H. H. (2017). Medical travel facilitators, private hospitals and international medical travel in assemblage. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 58(2), 242-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12161
  • Cormany, D. y Baloglu, S. (2011). Medical travel facilitator websites: An exploratory study of web page contents and services offered to the prospective medical tourist. Tourism management, 32(4), 709-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.008
  • Crooks, V. A., Turner, L., Snyder, J., Johnston, R. y Kingsbury, P. (2011). Promoting medical tourism to India: Messages, images, and the marketing of international patient travel. Social Science & Medicine, 72(5), 726-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.022
  • Gamble, N. (2009). Crossing the line: the legal and ethical problems of foreign surrogacy. Reproductive biomedicine online, 19(2), 151-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60064-8
  • Hanefeld, J., Lunt, N., Smith, R. y Horsfall, D. (2015). Why do medical tourists travel to where they do? The role of networks in determining medical travel. Social Science & Medicine, 124, 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.016
  • International Federation of Fertility Societies. (IFFS). (2016): Global reproductive health. IFFS Surveillance 2016. (7.ª ed.). International Federation of Fertility Societies.
  • Inhorn, M. C. y Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (2008). Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085230
  • Inhorn, M. C. y Gürtin, Z. B. (2011). Cross-border reproductive care: a future research agenda. Reproductive biomedicine online, 23(5), 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.002
  • Jacobson, H. (2016). Labor of love: Gestational surrogacy and the work of making babies. Rutgers University Press.
  • Jareño-Ruiz, D. (2014). Familias en transición: estudio sociológico de las familias adoptivas internacionales en la provincia de Alicante [tesis doctoral, Universidad de Alicante]. (57-76)
  • Kotiswaran, P. (2013). Do feminists need an economic sociology of law? Journal of Law and Society, 40(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00615.x
  • Lamm. E. (2013). Gestación por sustitución. Ni maternidad subrogada ni alquiler de vientres. Ediciones Universidad de Barcelona.
  • Lee, H., Wright, K. B., O’Connor, M. y Wombacher, K. (2014). Framing medical tourism: an analysis of persuasive appeals, risks and benefits, and new media features of medical tourism broker websites. Health communication, 29(7), 637-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.794412
  • Lunt, N. y Carrera, P. (2010). Medical tourism: assessing the evidence on treatment abroad. Maturitas, 66(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.01.017
  • Maguire, Á., Bussmann, S., zu Köcker, C. M., Verra, S. E., Giurgi, L. A. y Ruggeri, K. (2016). Raising concern about the information provided on medical travel agency websites: A place for policy. Health Policy and Technology, 5(4), 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.07.001
  • Markens, S. (2012). The global reproductive health market: US media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy. Social science & medicine, 74(11), 1745-1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.013
  • Meil Landwerlin, G. (2003). Las uniones de hecho en España. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Pande, A. (2009). Not an ‘Angel’, not a ‘Whore’ Surrogates as ‘Dirty’Workers in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16(2), 141-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150901600201
  • Penalva-Verdú, C., Alaminos, A., Francés, F. y Santacreu, Ó. (2015). La investigación cualitativa: técnicas de investigación y análisis con Atlas. ti. PYDLOS Ediciones.
  • Penney, K., Snyder, J., Crooks, V. A. y Johnston, R. (2011). Risk communication and informed consent in the medical tourism industry: a thematic content analysis of Canadian broker websites. BMC medical ethics, 12(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-12-17
  • Perkins, K. M., Boulet, S. L., Jamieson, D. J., Kissin, D. M. y System, N. A. R. T. S. (2016). Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 106(2), 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.050
  • Peters, C. R. y Sauer, K. M. (2011). A survey of medical tourism service providers. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5(3), 117-126.
  • Ragone, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: Conception in the heart. Westview Press.
  • Requena, M. (2002). Juventud y dependencia familiar en España. Revista de estudios de juventud, 58(02), 12-24.
  • Ribisl, K. M., Lee, R. E., Henriksen, L. y Haladjian, H. H. (2003). A content analysis of Web sites promoting smoking culture and lifestyle. Health Education & Behavior, 30(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198102239259
  • Rivas, A. Mª., Álvarez, C. y Jociles, Mª. I. (2018). La intervención de «terceros» en la producción de parentesco: perspectiva de los/as donantes, las familias y la descendencia. Un estado de la cuestión, en Revista de Antropología Social, 27(2), 221-245. https://doi.org/10.5209/RASO.61850
  • Rodríguez-Jaume, M. J. y Jareño-Ruiz, D. (2015). Estigma social y adopción internacional en España. Es la familia adoptiva un modelo familiar menos "auténtico" que los basados en lazos biológicos?. Papers: revista de sociología, 100(2), 211-236. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Papers/article/view/290217
  • Rudrappa, S. (2015). Discounted life: The price of global surrogacy in India. New York University Press.
  • Shenfield, F., Pennings, G., De Mouzon, J., Ferraretti, A. P. y Goossens, V. (2011). ESHRE's good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Human reproduction, 26(7), 1625-1627. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der090
  • Smietana, M. (2017). Affective de-commodifying, economic de-kinning: Surrogates’ and gay fathers’ narratives in US surrogacy. Sociological Research Online, 22(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.4312
  • Spar, D. (2006). The baby business: How money, sciencie and politics drive the commerce of conception. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Speier, A. (2015). Czech Hosts Creating" a Real Home Away from Home" for North American Fertility Travellers. Anthropologica, 57(1), 27-39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24470910
  • Teman, E. (2010). Birthing a mother: The surrogate body and the pregnant self. University of California Press.
  • Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. MIT press.
  • Twine, F. W. (2015). Outsourcing the womb: Race, class and gestational surrogacy in a global market. Routledge.
  • Whittaker, A. y Speier, A. (2010). “Cycling overseas”: care, commodification, and stratification in cross-border reproductive travel. Medical anthropology, 29(4), 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2010.501313
Fonte de datos: Dialnet