Sending Signals From Above

Estevez-Mendoza, Carlos

doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5151-9.CH006

Sending Signals From Above

Estevez-Mendoza, Carlos ¹

1 Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

Libro:

Global Perspectives on Maintaining Gender, Age, and Religious Diversity in the Workplace

ISSN: 2327-3372, 2327-3380

Año de publicación: 2022

Páginas: 97-119

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5151-9.CH006 GOOGLE SCHOLAR Acceso abierto editor

Resumen

Gender diversity at the top echelons of the firm may provide strong signals to foster diversity inside the organization. This chapter aims to contribute to the lack of studies based on complementary factors of board diversity, as they may build a potential exemplary roadmap within the same context. It seeks to understand whether sets of determinants whose combination may lead to making boards diverse in excess of the norm and steering the organization to the pursuit of the goal. Thus, the authors study different blends of variables such as size, public scrutiny, board independence, board size, proportion of proprietary directors, and diversity at the senior management of the firm, showing different paths to achieve diversity at the board. The authors employ a qualitative comparative methodology to study possible joint casual relations paving the way to diversity in Spanish-listed firms comparing changes over four years.

Referencias bibliográficas

10.2139/ssrn.594506
10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
10.1257/jel.48.1.58
10.2139/ssrn.2192918
10.1086/320271
10.1093/qje/qjr049
10.1093/SER/mwi013
10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98
10.1093/icc/dtv012
10.1002/smj.604
10.1007/s10551-020-04522-4
10.1093/restud/rdy032
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.091
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.021
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
Bilimoria, D. (2008). Directions for future research on women on corporate boards of directors. Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Research and Practice, 233–240.
10.1111/j.1468-232X.2007.00479.x
10.1111/1467-8683.00167
10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4_11
10.1016/j.brq.2018.06.004
Campbell, J. L. (2011). The US financial crisis : Lessons for theories of institutional complementarity. Academic Press.
10.1111/1540-6288.00034
10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.006
10.1057/jibs.2010.57
10.5465/amj.2010.0697
10.1080/09585192.2013.826714
10.1108/01437729910302723
10.1007/s11628-007-0022-2
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00837.x
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00837.x
10.1016/j.wsif.2014.01.008
10.5465/256713
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.059
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.x
10.1111/josi.12163
10.1037/a0018957
EaglyA. H.EaglyL. L. C. A. H.CarliL. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Press.
10.1287/mnsc.2021.4031
10.1080/1554477X.2011.613733
EtzioniA. (1961). Complex organizations: A sociological reader. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.1111/corg.12241
10.1111/corg.12211
10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5
10.1177/0149206316679252
10.1111/corg.12141
10.1111/corg.12024
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.002
10.1108/MRR-02-2016-0039
10.1177/0170840610380806
10.1177/1094428107302907
10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0
10.2307/255580
10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
10.1007/s10551-022-05168-0
10.1111/joms.12247
10.1111/corg.12090
10.5465/amj.2007.26279222
Höpner, M. (2005). What connects industrial relations and corporate governance ? Explaining institutional complementarity. Academic Press.
10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.032
10.1111/corg.12140
10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00710.x
10.1093/ser/mwr025
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102213
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025
KoskoB.TomsM. (1993). Fuzzy thinking: The new science of fuzzy logic. Hyperion New York.
10.1111/corg.12101
10.1111/corg.12172
10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.02.008
10.1177/001979399504800201
10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.006
10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229
10.19030/jber.v9i2.1818
10.1080/13545701.2014.895404
10.1007/s10551-011-1112-6
10.1111/corg.12006
10.5465/256809
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations : Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony Author (s): John W. Meyer and Brian Rowan Source : American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (Sep., 1977), pp. 340-363 Published by : The University of Chicago Press. AmericanJournal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2778293.pdf?acceptTC=true
10.5465/amj.2012.0728
Montoro-SánchezM. A.Estevez-MendozaC. (2021). Diversidad en el gobierno corporativo. Análisis configuracional de la presencia de mujeres en los consejos de administración.Economía Industrial, 419, 41–53.
10.1080/1331677X.2022.2038649
10.1007/s10551-012-1576-z
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x
10.1002/csr.1915
10.1007/s10490-022-09817-w
10.1108/MD-10-2019-1412
10.1007/s11846-020-00389-x
10.1080/09585192.2014.991344
PerrowC. (1979). Organizational theory in a society of organizations. Ecole Nationale d’Administration Publique.
10.1086/230727
10.1007/s10551-015-2735-9
Ragin, C., & Davey, S. (2014). fs/QCA [Computer Programme] Version [2.5/3.0]. Irvine: University of California.
RaginC. C. (1997). Turning The Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challeges Variable-Oriented Research.Comparative Social Research, 16, 27–42.
RaginC. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2004). Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 123.
10.1093/pan/mpj019
10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
RaginC. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
RaginC. C.FissP. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration.Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, 240, 190–212.
10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
10.1002/smj.4250160202
10.1177/0149206310374774
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00587.x
10.1080/1540496X.2015.1041845
10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.01.002
10.1007/s11365-017-0455-6
10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
10.1080/09585192.2010.509622
10.1177/0149206308324324
10.1111/1467-8683.00248
10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54
10.1016/j.respol.2020.103921
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400
10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
10.1002/mar.20763
10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.012
10.1016/0263-2373(90)90082-H
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652
10.1111/corg.12016