Antiexcepcionalismo humano y el problema de la identidad

  1. García-Arnaldos, María Dolores 1
  1. 1 Universidad CEU San Pablo
    info

    Universidad CEU San Pablo

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00tvate34

Journal:
Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética

ISSN: 2529-9573

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: Posthumanism, Transhumanism and Enhancement

Issue: 16

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14422/RIB.I16.Y2021.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética

Abstract

Posthumanism is a term that encompasses numerous theoretical analyses with a common denominator: human exceptionalism, or the privileged position of human beings with regard to the rest of the universe. The purpose of this article is to analyse the extent to which the non-naturalistic structure of the human being has blurred the traditional distinction between what is human and not human, and at the same time, to present a brief overview of the existing debate within posthumanism. Its aim is to question the multiple ways in which posthumanism, in its various configurations, is anti-exceptionalist and challenges our notion of what is “human”.

Bibliographic References

  • Bostrom, N., et al. (1998). The Transhumanist Declaration. http://www.transhumanism.com/declaration.htm
  • Bostrom, N. (2008). Letter from Utopia. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1025
  • Bertolaso, M. (2010). “Super-naturali” come vampiri: L’Enhancement in medicina. En C. Cullen (ed.), La medicina dei nuovi vampiri. Milán: Academia Universa Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Braidotti, R., y Hlavajova, M. (eds.) (2017). The Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury: London.
  • Darwin, C. (1860). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. New York: D. Appleton and Company, [1859].
  • Derrida, J. (2008). The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Derrida, J. (2008). El animal que luego estoy si(gui)endo. Editorial Trotta.
  • Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Habermas, J. (2002). El futuro de la naturaleza humana. ¿Hacia una eugenesia liberal? Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Manifestly Haraway. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Marcos, A. (2018). Bases filosóficas para una crítica al transhumanismo. ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios de la ciencia y la tecnología, 7(2), 2ª Época, 107-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/art201872107125
  • MacCormack, P. (ed.). (2014). The animal catalyst: Towards ahuman theory. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Savulescu, J., y Bostrom, N. (eds.). (2009). Human Enhancement. Oxford: OUP.
  • Sloterdijk, P. (2003). Normas para el parque humano. Madrid: Siruela.
  • Thomsen, M. R., & Wamberg, J. (eds.). (2020). The Bloomsbury Handbook of Posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Ursúa, N. (2010). ¿Tendrá la “Convergencia de Tecnologías” (CT) y la “Mejora Técnica del Ser Humano” un impacto similar al darwinismo? Implicaciones y consideraciones filosóficas. Endoxa, 24, 311-329. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.24.2010.5355
  • Williamson, T. (5 February 2021). Disagreement in Metaphysics. Forthcoming in Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter and Richard Rowland (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Disagreement, London: Routledge.
  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Data source: Dialnet