Reassessing the classical investment function. A panel data analysis from nafta-usmca

  1. Fahd Boundi-Chraki
Revista:
Revista de economía mundial

ISSN: 1576-0162

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 61

Páginas: 39-62

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.33776/REM.V0I61.5145 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openArias Montano editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de economía mundial

Resumen

La presente investigación emplea la segunda generación de las técnicas de cointegración en panel junto con los estimadores que controlan la dependencia de sección cruzada para evaluar empíricamente la validez del enfoque clásico de la acumulación del capital en Canadá, México y los Estados Unidos durante el lapso 1960-2019. Los resultados sugieren que la inversión privada se encuentra positivamente relacionada con la tasa de ganancia, los costes laborales unitarios y el crecimiento de la demanda agregada, tanto en el corto como en el largo plazos. Asimismo, el análisis de causalidad revela la existencia de potenciales bucles de retroalimentación entre las variables del modelo.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alexiou, C. (2010). A Keynesian-Kaleckian Model of Investment Determination: A Panel Data Investigation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 32(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477320307
  • Alexiou, C., Tsaliki, P., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2016). Classical Theory of Investment: Panel Cointegration Evidence from 13 EU Countries. Contributions to Political Economy, 35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzw004
  • Arestis, P., & González-Martínez, A. R. (2016). Revisiting the Accelerator Principle in a World of Uncertainty: Some Empirical Evidence. Economic Modelling, 56, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.03.012
  • Arestis, P., González-Martínez, A. R., & Dejuán, Ó. (2012). Modelling Accumulation: A Theoretical and Empirical Application of the Accelerator Principle under Uncertainty. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 9(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.4337/ ejeep.2012.02.08
  • Baghestani, H., & Mott, T. (2014). Asymmetries in the Relation Between Investment and Output. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 37(2), 357– 365. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477370208
  • Banerjee, A., & Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. (2017). Testing for Panel Cointegration Using Common Correlated Effects Estimators. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 38(4), 610–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12234
  • Barradas, R. (2017). Financialisation and Real Investment in the European Union: Beneficial or Prejudicial Effects?. Review of Political Economy, 29(3), 376–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2017.1348574
  • Barradas, R., & Lagoa, S. (2017). Financialization and Portuguese Real Investment: A Supportive or Disruptive Relationship?. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/016034 77.2017.1286940
  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
  • Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-run Data Show. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072–1085. https://doi.org/10.2307/1816469
  • Bersvendsen, T., & Ditzen, J. (2020). Testing for Slope Homogeneity in Stata. CEERP Working Paper Series, 11, 1–28.
  • Blomquist, J., & Westerlund, J. (2013). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels with Serial Correlation. Economics Letters, 121(3), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.09.012
  • Boundi-Chraki, F. (2020a). El Estado y la sociedad en la economía política. Revista de economía institucional, 22(42), 187-210. https://doi. org/10.18601/01245996.v22n42.08
  • Boundi-Chraki, F. (2020b). La economía política de la autonomía del Banco Central Europeo. Investigación económica, 79(312), 113-139. http:// dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.312.75374
  • Boundi-Chraki, F. (2021a). Testing the Relationship Between Real Effective Exchange Rate and Absolute Cost Advantage. A Dynamic Panel GMM Analysis from NAFTA. Applied Economics Letters, 28(15), 1332-1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1814941
  • Boundi-Chraki, F. (2021b). Revisiting some Aspects of Marx’s Theoretical Corpus in the Light of Modern Economics. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 49(1–2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2021.1934 082
  • Boundi-Chraki, F., & Perrotini-Hernández, I. (2021). Absolute Cost Advantage and Sectoral Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence from NAFTA and the European Union. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 162– 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.020
  • Breitung, J., & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for Shortand Long-Run Causality: A Frequency-Domain Approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 363– 378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004
  • Bressler, S. L., & Seth, A. K. (2011). Wiener-Granger Causality: A Well Established Methodology. NeuroImage, 58(2), 323–329. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.059
  • Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common Correlated Effects Estimation of Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Data Models with Weakly Exogenous Regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
  • Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M. H., & Raissi, M. (2016). Long-run Effects in Large Heterogeneous Panel Data Models with Cross-Sectionally Correlated Errors. Advances in Econometrics, 36, 85–135. https://doi. org/10.1108/S0731-905320160000036013
  • Ditzen, J. (2018). Estimating Dynamic Common-Correlated Effects in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 18(3), 585–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801800306
  • Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  • Eberhardt, M. (2011a). MULTIPURT: Stata Module to Run 1st and 2nd Generation Panel Unit Root Tests for Multiple Variables and Lags. Statistical Software Components S457237. https://econpapers.repec.org/ RePEc:boc:bocode:s457239
  • Eberhardt, M. (2011b). XTCD: Stata Module to Investigate Variable/Residual Cross-Section Dependence. Statistical Software Components S457237. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s457237
  • Eberhardt, M. (2012). Estimating Panel Time-Series Models with Heterogeneous Slopes. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications On Statistics and Stata, 12(1), 61–71. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1536867X1201200105
  • Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). Aggregation Versus Heterogeneity in CrossCountry Growth Empirics. Economics Series Working Papers CSAE WPS/2010-32.
  • Eyuboglu, S., & Eyuboglu, K. (2020). Tourism Development and Economic Growth: An Asymmetric Panel Causality Test. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(6), 659–665. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1588863
  • Gereffi, G., Spener, D., & Bair, J. (2009). Free Trade & Uneven Development: North American Apparel Industry After NAFTA. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424. Https:// Doi.Org/10.2307/1912791
  • Hashem Pesaran, M., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity In Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. Https://Doi. Org/10.1016/J.Jeconom.2007.05.010
  • Hatemi-J, A., Ajmi, A. N., El Montasser, G., Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Guptae, R. (2016). Research Output and Economic Growth in G7 Countries: New Evidence from Asymmetric Panel Causality Testing. Applied Economics, 48(24), 2301–2308. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1117052
  • Hicks, J. R. (1950). A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel Data Analysis-Advantages and Challenges. Test, 16(1), 1–22. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11749-007-0046-X
  • Kaldor, N. (1970). The Case for Regional Policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 337–348. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1467-9485.1970. Tb00712.X
  • Kalecki, M. (1954). Theory of Economic Dynamics. An Essay On Cyclical and Long-Run Changes in Capitalist Economy. New York And London: Routledge.
  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, And Money. London: Macmillan.
  • Lewandowski, P. (2007). PESCADF: Stata Module to Perform Pesaran’s CADF Panel Unit Root Test in Presence of Cross Section Dependence. Econpapers. Https://Econpapers.Repec.Org/Repec:Boc:Bocode:S456732
  • Manera, C., Badal, F. N., & Manchado, J. F. (2016). Distribución De La Renta, Beneficio Y Desigualdad: Una Aplicación A La Historia Económica De Estados Unidos, 1910-20101. Revista De Economía Mundial, (42), 89– 108. Https://Doi.Org/10.33776/REM.V0I42.3928
  • Manera, C., Navinés, F., Franconetti, J., & Pérez-Montiel, J. (2019). Crisi, Desigualtat I Anàlisi Econòmica, 1910-2015: Alguns Instruments De L’economia Clàssica. Scripta Nova, 23(610), 1–30. Https://Doi. Org/10.1344/Sn2019.23.21645
  • Marx, K. (1867). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, Vol I. London: Penguin.
  • Marx, K. (1894). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. III. London: Penguin.
  • Marx, K. (1895). Value, Price, And Profit. Moscow: Progress.
  • Marx, K. (1973). Gründrisse: Foundations of The Critique Of Political Economy. London: Penguin.
  • Mccombie, J. S. L., & Thirlwall, A. P. (1994). Economic Growth, The Harrod Foreign Trade Multiplier and The Hicks Super-Multiplier. In J. S. L. Mccombie & A. P. Thirlwall (Eds.), Economic Growth and The Balance-OfPayments Constraint (Pp. 392–420). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Https:// Doi.Org/10.1007/978-1-349-23121-8_6
  • Mcnulty, P. J. (1968). Economic Theory and The Meaning of Competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(4), 639–656. Https://Doi. Org/10.2307/1879604
  • Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Countries. London: Duckworth.
  • Pérez-Montiel, J. A., & Manera, C. (2020). Permanent Demand and Private Investment in The General Theory: An Empirical Investigation. Revista De Economía Mundial, (54), 107–128. Https://Doi.Org/10.33776/Rem. V0i54.3835
  • Perrotini-Hernández, I., & Vázquez-Muñoz, J. A. (2019). Endogenous Growth, Capital Accumulation and Thirlwall’s Dynamics: The Case of Latin America. Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(4), 444–462. Https://Doi.Org/10.4337/ Roke.2019.04.03
  • Persyn, D., & Westerlund, J. (2008). Error-Correction–Based Cointegration Tests for Panel Data. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications On Statistics and Stata, 8(2), 232–241. Https://Doi. Org/10.1177/1536867X0800800205
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with A Multifactor Error Structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1468-0262.2006.00692.X
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in The Presence of CrossSection Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Jae.951
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00181-020-01875-7
  • Ponte, S., Gereffi, G., Raj-Reichert, G., Werner, M., & Bair, J. (2019). Global value chains and uneven development: a disarticulations perspective. In S. Ponte, G. Gereffi, G. Raj-Reichert (Eds) Handbook on Global Value Chains (pp. 183–198). London: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi. org/10.4337/9781788113779.00017
  • Ricardo, D. (1821). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation: Vol. 1 (Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.
  • Ros, J. (2013). Algunas tesis equivocadas sobre el estancamiento económico de México. México: El Colegio de México-UNAM.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York And London: Routledge.
  • Serrano, F. (1995). Long Period Effective Demand and The Sraffian Supermultiplier. Contributions to Political Economy, 14(1), 67–90. Https:// Doi.Org/10.1093/Oxfordjournals.Cpe.A035642
  • Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism. Competition, Conflict, Crises. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sharma, C., & Pal, D. (2021). Revisiting Resource Curse Puzzle: New Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Analysis. Applied Economics, 53(8), 897-912. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1817309
  • Sismondi, J. C. L. S. De (1821). New Principles of Political Economy: Of Wealth in Its Relation to Population. New Brunswick And London:Transactions Publisher.
  • Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into The Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
  • Stockhammer, E., & Grafl, L. (2010). Financial Uncertainty and Business Investment. Review of Political Economy, 22(4), 551–568. Https://Doi.Org /10.1080/09538259.2010.510317
  • Urbain, J.-P., & Westerlund, J. (2006). Spurious Regression in Nonstationary Panels with Cross-Unit Cointegration. Quantitative Economics, Externe Publicaties SBE, Graduate School of Business and Economics. Https://Doi. Org/10.26481/Umamet.2006057
  • Vázquez Muñoz, J. A., & Avendaño Vargas, B. L. (2012). ¿Modelo De Crecimiento Exportador O Modelo De Estancamiento Exportador? El Caso De México, 1961-2010. Investigación Económica, 71(282), 93–108. Https://Doi. Org/10.22201/Fe.01851667p.2012.282.37365
  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/ J.1468-0084.2007.00477.X
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet