Innovación, crecimiento y competitividad: el papel de la política tecnológica en España

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abadie, A. e Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), pp. 235-267.
• Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History, 46(2), pp. 385-406.
• Aerts, K. y Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one?: Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), pp. 806-822.
• Afcha, S. y García-Quevedo, J. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(6), pp. 955-975.
• Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., Mchale, J. y Oettl, A. (2011). Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(1), pp. 43-55.
• Alecke, B., Mitze, T., Reinkowski, J. y Untiedt, G. ( 2012). Does firm size make a difference? Analysing the effectiveness of R&D subsidies in East Germany. German Economic Review, 13(2), pp. 174-195.
• Almus, M. y Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(2), pp. 226-236.
• Appelbaum, E. y Schettkat, R. (1994). The end of full employment? On economic development in industrialized countries. Intereconomics, 29(3), pp. 122-130.
• Aristei, D., Sterlacchini, A. y Venturini, F. (2015). Effectiveness of R&D subsidies during the crisis: firmlevel evidence across EU countries. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 26(6), pp. 554-573.
• Arnold, J. (2008). Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence From a Panel of OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 643. París: OECD Publishing.
• Arrow, K.(1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, pp. 609-625. Princeton University Press.
• Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H. y Lenz, S. (2002). The effectiveness of government promotion of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT): An economic analysis based on Swiss micro data. Small Business Economics, 19(4), pp. 321-340.
• Aschhoff, B. (2009). The effect of subsidies on R&D investment and success–Do subsidy history and size matter? ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (09-032).
• Aschhoff, B. (2010). Who Gets the Money? Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 230(5), pp. 522-546.
• Barajas, A., Huergo, E. y Moreno, L. (2017). Public Support to Business R&D and the Economic Crisis: Spanish Evidence.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, (17), pp. 99-120.
• Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), pp. 41-56.
• Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), pp. 407-443.
• Barro, R. J. y Sala-I-Martin, X. (1995). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. National Bureau of Economic Research, (w5151).
• Bassanini, A. y Scarpetta, S. (2001). The driving forces of economic growth. OECD Economic Studies, 2001/II(33), pp. 9-56.
• Becher, G., Gielow, G., Herden, R., Kuhlmann, S. y Kuntze, U. (1989). FuE-Personalkostenzuschüsse: Strukturentwicklung. Beschäftigungswirkungen und Konsequenzen fur die Innovationspolitik. ISI/DIW.
• Beine, M., Docquier, F. y Rapoport, H. (2008). Brain drain and human capital formation in developing countries: Winners and losers. The Economic Journal, 118(528), pp. 631-652.
• Benhabib, J. y Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(2), pp. 143-173.
• Blackburne III, E. F. y Frank, M. W. (2007). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. The Stata Journal, 7(2), pp. 197-208.
• Blanes, J. V. y Busom, I. (2004). Who participates in R&D subsidy programs?: The case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 33(10), pp. 1459-1476.
• Bogliacino, F. y Pianta, M. (2016). The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services. Economia Politica, 33(2), pp. 153-180.
• Boroush, M. y Jankowski, J. (2016). Update on US business innovation: Findings from 2011 Survey. InfoBrief, NCSES.
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 61-74.
• Bouis, R., Duval, R. y Murtin, F. (2001). The policy and institutional drivers of economic growth: New evidence form growth regressions. Working Paper (843).
• Brandts, J., Busom, I., Caminal, R., Garcia-Milá, T., Martínez-Giralt, X., Matutes, C. y Vives, X. (1989). An overall evaluation of the state of R&D in Spain. A report to the Comisslon of the European Communities.
• Buckley, P. J., Pass, C. L. y Prescott, K. (1988). Measures of international competitiveness: A critical survey. Journal of Marketing Management, 4(2), pp. 175-200.
• Buesa, M. (1994). La política tecnológica en España: una evaluación en la perspectiva del sistema productivo. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de economía, (726), pp. 161-182.
• Buesa, M. (1996). Empresas innovadoras y política tecnológica en el País Vasco: una evaluación del papel de los centros tecnológicos. Economía Industrial, (312), pp. 177-189.
• Buesa, M. y Molero, J. (1987). La intervención estatal en la remodelación del sistema productivo: el caso de la industria electrónica española durante los años 80. Estudios de Economía, 7(3), pp. 271-295.
• Buesa, M. y Molero, J. (1992). Patrones del cambio tecnológico y política industrial: un estudio de las empresas innovadoras madrileñas. Madrid: Civitas.
• Buesa, M. y Molero, J.(1996). Innovación y diseño industrial. Evaluación de la política de promoción del diseño en España. Madrid: Civitas.
• Buesa, M., Navarro, M. y Zubiaurre, A. (1997). La innovación tecnológica en las empresas de las Comunidades Autónomas del País Vasco y Navarra. Eusko Ikaskuntza.
• Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M. y Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4-6), pp. 587-600.
• Busom, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Innovation and New Technology, 9(2), pp. 111-148.
• Busom, I., Corchuelo, B. y Martínez-Ros, E. (2014). Tax incentives… or subsidies for business R&D? Small Business Economics, 43(3), pp. 571-596.
• Busom, I., Corchuelo, B. y Martínez-Ros, E. (2015). ¿Todos los caminos llevan a Roma? Incentivos fiscales, ayudas directas y la inversión empresarial en I+D. EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de economía, 88(02), pp. 262-281.
• Busom, I., Corchuelo, B. y Martínez-Ros, E. (2017). Participation inertia in R&D tax incentive and subsidy programs. Small Business Economics, 48(1), pp. 153-177.
• Busom, I. y Vélez-Ospina, J. (2018). Public support to innovation over the business cycle: how effective? Informe preliminar.
• Caliendo, M. y Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), pp. 31-72.
• Capron, H. (1992). Proceedings of the Workshop on Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of R&D Programmes EN. Bruselas: Unión Europea.
• Carboni, O. A. (2011). R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: Evidence from Italian manufacturing data. International Review of Applied Economics, 25(4), pp. 419-439.
• Caselli, F., Esquivel, G. y Lefort, F. (1996). Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at crosscountry growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(3), pp. 363-389.
• Centro Interamericano de Administraciones Tributarias. (2016). Impuestos sobre los salarios en América Latina y el Caribe: Resumen.
• Cerulli, G. y Potì, B. (2012). Evaluating the robustness of the effect of public subsidies on firms’ R&D: An application to Italy. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2), pp. 287-320.
• Cervantes, M. y Guellec, D. (2002). The brain drain: Old myths, new realities. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD Observer, (230), pp. 40.
• Clausen, T. H. (2009). Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, 20(4), pp. 239-253.
• Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas (CEC). (1994). Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales.
• Comisión Europea. (2001). European Competitiveness Report 2001. Brussels: DG for Enterprise and Industry.
• COTEC. (2004). Los incentivos fiscales a la innovación. Madrid.
• Crespi, G., Giuliodori, D., Giuliodori, R. y Rodríguez, A. (2016). The effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D i in developing countries: The case of Argentina. Research Policy, 45(10), pp. 2023-2035.
• Czarnitzki, D. y Delanote, J. (2015). R&D policies for young SMEs: Input and output effects. Small Business Economics, 45(3), pp. 465-485.
• Czarnitzki, D. y Fier, A. (2002). No title. Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment? Evidence from the German service sector.
• Czarnitzki, D. y Hussinger, K. (2004). The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending and technological performance. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (04-056).
• Czarnitzki, D. y Licht, G. (2006). Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: The case of Eastern Germany. Economics of Transition, 14(1), pp. 101-131.
• Czarnitzki, D. y Lopes-Bento, C. (2011). Evaluation of public R&D policies: A cross-country comparison. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(2-4), pp. 254-282.
• Czarnitzki, D. y Lopes-Bento, C. (2013). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy, 42(1), pp. 76-89.
• Czarnitzki, D. y Lopes-Bento, C. (2014). Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 21(5), pp. 380-409
• Dai, X. y Cheng, L. (2015). The effect of public subsidies on corporate R&D investment: An application of the generalized propensity score. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, pp. 410-419.
• David, P. A., Hall, B. H. y Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), pp. 497-529.
• Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), pp. 1120-1171.
• Dumont, M. (2013). The impact of subsidies and fiscal incentives on corporate R&D expenditures in Belgium (2001-2009). Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, 52(1), pp. 69-91.
• Easterly, W. y Levine, R. (2001). What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It’s Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(2), pp. 177-219.
• Economic World Forum. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017.
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies. Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
• Eisner, R. (1985). R&D Tax Credit. En E. Morrison C. L. (ed.), National Policy, Impact on the U. S. Research and Development.
• Era-Watch. (2009). Analysis of policy mixes to foster RD investment and to contribute to the ERA. ERAwatch Network.
• Fagerberg, J. (1988). Why growth rates differ. En G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg y L. Soete (eds.), Technical change and economic theory, pp. 432-457. London: Pinter Publishers.
• Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3), pp. 1147-1175.
• Fernández, J. y Martín, F. (2015). The effects of developing-countries’ innovation support programs: evidence from Ecuador. Innovation, 17(4), pp. 466-484.
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance. Lessons from Japan. London, NY.
• Fagerberg, J. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Oxon. Routledge.
• Freeman, C .H. (1994). Innovation and Growth. En M. Dodgson y R. Rothwell (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological. Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Edgar Publishing.
• Galindo-Rueda, F. y Verger, F. (2016). OECD taxonomy of economic activities based on R&D intensity. Working Papers. OECD Science, Technology and Industry.
• Georghiou, L. (1994). Impact of the framework programme on European industry. European Commission, Directorate General Telecommunications, Information.
• Geroski, P. y Machin, S. (2013). Think Again: Do Innovating Firms Outperform Non-Innovators? Business Strategy Review, 24(2), pp. 82-86.
• Gonzales-Cabral, A., Appelt, S. y Galinada-Rueda, F. (2018). OECD review of national R&D tax incentives and estimates of R&D tax subsidy rates 2017.
• González, X., Jaumandreu, J. y Pazó, C. (2005). Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. RAND Journal of Economics, pp. 930-950.
• González, X. y Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), pp. 371-389.
• Görg, H. y Strobl, E. (2007). The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74(294), pp. 215-234.
• Griliches, Z. (1984). R & D, Patents, and Productivity (A National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report). University of Chicago Press.
• Griliches, Z. (1986). Productivity, R&D and basic research at firm level, is there still a relationship. American Economic Review, 76(1), pp. 141-154.
• Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), pp. 1661.
• Griliches, Z. y Lichtenberg, F. R. (1984). R&D and productivity growth at the industry level: Is there still a relationship? R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pp. 465-502. University of Chicago Press.
• Gutiérrez, C., Heijs, J., Buesa, M. y Baumert, T. (2016). Innovación y crecimiento económico. Aplicación de análisis factorial y modelos dinámicos de datos de panel. Working Paper (101). Instituto de Análisis Industrial y Financiero: Universidad Complutense Madrid.
• Gutiérrez, C., Heijs, J., Buesa, M. y Baumert, T. (2016). Configuración de los sistemas nacionales de innovación y su impacto sobre el crecimiento económico. Economía y Política, 3(2), pp. 37-83.
• Hall, B. H. y Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, pp. 609-639. Elsevier.
• Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), pp. 1251-1271. Journal of the Econometric Society.
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), pp. 153-161. Journal of the Econometric Society.
• Heckman, J., Lalonde, R. y Smith, J. (1999). The economics and econometrics of ALMP. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3.
• Heijs, J. J. (1999). El acceso a las ayudas de la Administración Pública: la presencia del CDTI en el País Vasco y Navarra. Ekonomiaz: Revista vasca de economía, 44, pp. 278-301.
• Heijs, J. J. (2000). Evaluación de proyectos en I+D financiados por el CDTI. Economía Industrial, 334, pp. 81-92.
• Heijs, J. J. (2001). Política tecnológica e innovación: evaluación de la financiación pública de I+D en España. Consejo Económico Social.
• Heijs, J. J. (2005). Identification of firms supported by technology policies: The case of Spanish low interest credits. Science and Public Policy, 32(3), pp. 219-230.
• Heijs, J. J. (2012). Fallos sistémicos y de mercado en el sistema español de innovación. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de Economía, 869, pp. 43-64.
• Heijs, J. J. (2018). Competitividad nacional versus innovación.
• Heijs, J. y Buesa, M. (2007). La cooperación en innovación en España y el papel de las ayudas públicas. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
• Herrera, L. y Bravo, E. (2010). Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size. Intangible Capital, 6(2), pp. 272-299.
• Herrera, L. y Heijs, J. (2007). Difusión y adicionalidad de las ayudas públicas a la innovación. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 15(44).
• Hogan, T., Humphery-Jenner, M., Tran Thi Lan, H. y Powell, R. (2015). The Returns to Public Investment in Innovation: Do R&D Grants Influence Corporate Innovation, Performance, and Employment?
• Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American statistical Association, 81(396), pp. 945-960.
• Hottenrott, H., Lopes-Bento, C. y Veugelers, R. (2017). Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program. Research Policy, 46(6), pp. 1118-1132.
• Hu, A. G. (2007). Technology parks and regional economic growth in China. Research Policy, 36(1), pp. 76-87.
• Hud, M. y Hussinger, K. (2015). The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. Research Policy, 44(10), pp. 1844-1855.
• Huergo, E. y Moreno, L. (2017). Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the impact of R&D support programmes. Research Policy, 46(7), pp. 1198-1214.
• Huergo, E., Trenado, M. y Ubierna, A. (2016). The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, pp. 206-219.
• Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6), pp. 729-747.
• Jones, C. I. y Romer, P. M. (2010). The new Kaldor facts: Ideas, institutions, population, and human capital. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1), pp. 224-245.
• Kamien, M. I. y Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation. Cambridge University Press.
• Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73, pp. 28-44.
• Krugman, P. R. (1996). Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), pp. 17-25.
• Kulicke, M., Bross, U. y Gundrum, U. (1997). Innovationsdarlehen Als Instrument Zur Förderung Kleiner und Mittlerer Unternehmen. ISI-Fraunhofer.
• Kuntze, U. y Hornschild, K. (1995). Evaluation of the promotion of R&D activities in small and mediumsized enterprises. Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany, pp. 33-54. Springer.
• Leuven, E. y Sianesi, B. (2003). Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Statistical Software Components S432001.
• Lichtenberg, F. R. (1987). The effect of government funding on private industrial research and development: a re-assessment. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(1), pp. 97-104.
• Lippman, S. A. y Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), pp. 418-438.
• Lundvall, B. (1992). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London Printer.
• Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D. y Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), pp. 407-437.
• Mansfield, E. (1968). Industrial research and technological innovation; An econometric analysis.
• Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science, 32(2), pp. 173-181.
• Manual, F. (2015). Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on Research and Experimental Development. Disponible en: http://www.uis.unesco.org/ScienceTechnology/Documents/oecdfrascati-manual.pdf
• Manual, O. O. (2018). Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation.
• Marino, M., Parrotta, P. y Lhuillery, S. (2015). An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure in absence or in combination with R&D tax credit incentives, DRUID15 Conference on The Relevance of Innovation, Rome, Italy. Disponible en: http://druid8.sit. aau. dk/acc_papers/ arlixjutu74vl8ct298hi8fyc8ph. pdf2015
• Martin, R. y Sunley, P. (1998). Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development. Economic Geography, 74(3), pp. 201-227.
• Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1987). Evaluating innovation policies: the German experience. Technovation, 5(4), pp. 317-330.
• Meyer-Krahmer, F.(1989). Der Einfluß staatlicher Technologiepolitik auf industrielle Innovationen. Nomos Verlag-Ges.
• Molero, J. y Buesa, M. (1995). Análisis y evaluación de la actuación del CDTI: política tecnológica e innovación en la empresa española. Una evaluación de la actuación del CDTI. Instituto de Análisis Industrial Financiero. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
• Morales, D., Blanco, M. B., Heijs, J. y Baumert, T. (2018). Innovación y competitividad: un análisis aplicado a las empresas industriales españolas. Cuadernos de Información Económica, 265, pp. 25-41.
• Moyeda Mendoza, C. y Arteaga García, J. C. (2016). Medición de la innovación, una perspectiva microeconómica basada en la ESIDET-MBN 2012. Realidad, Datos y Espacio. Revista Internacional de Estadística y Geografía, 7(1), pp. 38-57.
• Naciones Unidas. (1968). Un sistema de cuentas nacionales. Estudios de Métodos, Serie F. (2. Rev 3).
• Neicu, D. (2016). Mix and match: evaluating the additionality of the R&D policy mix.
• Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), pp. 297-306.
• Nelson, R. R. (1993a). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.
• Nelson, R. R. (1993b). National systems of innovation: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Nelson, R. R. y Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, 7, pp. 1-18.
• OCDE. (1992). Technology and the economy: The key relationships. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos.
• OCDE. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos.
• OCDE. (2006). Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación (3ª. edición). Madrid: Grupo Tragsa.
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), pp. 343-373.
• Pavitt, K. y Soete, L. (1982). International differences in economic growth and the international location of innovation. En H. Giersch (ed.), Towards an Explanation of Economic Growth, pp. 105-133.
• Pavitt, K. y Soete, L.Cambridge: JCB Mohr, Tübingen.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. y Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), pp. 621-634.
• Pesaran, M. H. y Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), pp. 79-113.
• Porter, M. (1985). The value chain and competitive advantage, Chapter 2 in competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance.
• Porter, M. (1990.) The comparative advantage of nations. Free Press and Macmillan.
• Porter, M. E. (1990a). The competitive advantage of nations, pp. 564. New York: Free Press.
• Porter, M. (1990b). The competitive advantage of nations: With a new introduction. New York: Free Press.
• Porter, M. (1990c). On Competition. A Harvard Business Review Book.
• Porter, M. (2004). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, with a new introduction. Copyright 1985.
• Porter, M. (2008). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.
• Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Bennett, S. E., Bahmani, S. y Hall, J. H. (2018). Endogenous dynamics between innovation, financial markets, venture capital and economic growth: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 45, pp. 15-34.
• Prebisch, R. (1950). Crecimiento, desequilibrio y disparidades: interpretación del proceso de desarrollo económico. En Estudio económico de América Latina, 1949-E/CN.12/164/Rev.1-1950-p.3-89.
• Ranciere, R. y Loayza, N. (2005). Financial Development, Financial Fragility and Growth. IMF Working Paper.
• Reger, G. y Kuhlmann, S.(1995). European Technology Policy in Germany: The Impact of European Community Policies upon Science and Technology in Germany.
• Romero-Jordán, D. y Sanz, J. F. (2007). Eficacia de los incentivos fiscales a la inversión en I D en España en los años noventa. Hacienda Pública Española, 183(4), pp. 9-32.
• Rosenbaum, P. R. y Rubin, D. B. (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1), pp. 41-55.
• Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press.
• Rothwell, R. (1983). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Government Innovation Policies. University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit.
• Rothwell, R. y Zegveld, W. (1985). Reindustrialization and technology. ME Sharpe.
• Rubin, D. B. (1973). Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 29, pp. 159-183.
• Sala-i-Martin, X. (1994). Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. Economics Working Paper (104). Universitá Pompeu Fabra.
• Schumpter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles; a Theoretical Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.
• Sianesi, B. (2004). An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labor market programs in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), pp. 133-155.
• Siegel, B. (2006). Sweet nothing: The triumph of diet soda (Hyman Kirsch). American Heritage, 57(3), pp. 40-49.
• Siegert, G., Meyer-Krahmer, F. y Walter, G. (1985). Wirkungsanalyse der fachprogrammbezogenen projektförderung bei kleinen und mittleren unternehmen. ISI-Fraunhofer.
• Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 125-134.
• Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. New York: Bantam Classic.
• Soete, L. y Turner, R. (1984). Technology diffusion and the rate of technical change. The Economic Journal, 94(375), pp. 612-623.
• Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), pp. 65-94.
• Spielkamp, A. y Rammer, C. (2009). Financing of Innovation-Thresholds and Options. Management & Marketing, 4(2).
• Sterlacchini, A. y Venturini, F. (2018). R&D tax incentives in EU countries: Does the impact vary with firm size? Small Business Economics, pp. 1-22.
• Stigler, G. (1989). Competition. En J. Eatwell, M. Milgate y P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 1. London: Macmillan.
• Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), pp. 285-305.
• Teece, D. J. (2006). Reflections on “profiting from innovation”. Research Policy, 35(8), pp. 1131-1146.
• United States President’s Commission on Industrial Competitiveness. (1985). The Report of the President’s Commission on Industrial Technology. Washington, DC: GPO.
• Valadez, P., Heijs, J. y Buesa, M. (2011). El impacto de las ventajas fiscales para la I+D e innovación. Papeles de Economía Española, 127. Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros.
• Vence, X. (1998). La política tecnológica comunitaria y la cohesión regional. Los retos de los sistemas de innovación periféricos. Madrid: Civitas.
• Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26(3), pp. 303-315.
• Weil, D. (2006). Crecimiento Económico. Madrid: Addison-Wesley.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
• Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á, Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J. y Galán, J. I.,( 2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), pp. 36-67.