Estudio de diferentes protocolos de restricción alimentaria sobre el desarrollo fetoplacentario en la coneja

  1. J. López Tello
  2. M. Arias Alvarez 1
  3. R.M. García García 2
  4. M. Rodriguez 2
  5. N. Formoso Rafferty 2
  6. R. Bermejo Poza 2
  7. P.L. Lorenzo 2
  8. P.G. Rebollar 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

Libro:
XVI Jornadas sobre Producción Animal: 19 y 20 de mayo de 2015, Zaragoza
  1. Javier Álvarez Rodríguez
  2. Begoña Panea Doblado
  3. Jorge Hugo Calvo Lacosta
  4. Mireia Blanco Alibés
  5. José Alfonso Abecia Martínez
  6. Daniel Villalba Mata
  7. María Ángeles Latorre Górriz

Editorial: Asociación Interprofesional para el Desarrollo Agrario

ISBN: 978-84-606-7969-1

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 2

Páginas: 429-431

Congreso: Jornadas sobre producción animal (16. 2015. Zaragoza)

Tipo: Aportación congreso

Resumen

To evaluate the effect of different feed restrictions on the fetoplacental development in rabbit does, a total of 32 animals were divided in three groups. Group C (n=9) was fed ad libitum throughout the pregnancy, whereas group P (n=11) was restricted to 50% of their requirements from day 0 to day 7 of pregnancy and group T (n=12) restricted to 50% throughout the pregnancy. On day 28 of pregnancy, fetuses from group T presented lower placental weight and fetal size respect group C and P (P<0.05). Feed restriction during the first week was related to a lower fetal distance from crown to tail basis respect group C. Does from group P consumed a higher amount of feed respect group C when the restriction period was concluded. In conclusion, a severe feed restriction throughout pregnancy affected negatively the development of the conceptuses, whereas the restriction during the first week reduced crown to tail basis respect group C. However, it was not linked to an altered ovulation or a higher implantational loss rate.