En búsqueda de un equilibrio inestable en grupos científicos de alto rendimientoEstilos de colaboración y de liderazgo

Referencias bibliográficas

• Citas Alonso, L. E. (1998). La mirada cualitativa en sociología: una aproximación interpretativa. Madrid: Fundamentos.
• Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002
• Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
• Bandura, A. A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327809JLS1203_1.
• Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014254214337
• Belli, S., & Balta, J. (2019). Mapeo de las publicaciones científicas entre América Latina, el Caribe y la Unión Europea. América Latina Hoy, 82, 7-41
• Benozzo, A., & Colley, H. (2012). Emotion and learning in the workplace: critical perspectives. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(5), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621211239903
• Birnholtz, J. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Towards a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226-2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20684
• Borrego, A. (1999). La investigación cualitativa y sus aplicaciones en Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 22(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.1999.v22.i2.335
• Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations?. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393-1402.
• Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
• Callon, M., Rip, A. & Law, J. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan Press.
• D’Este, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., Woolley, R., & Amara, N. (2018). How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework. Science and Public Policy, 45(6), 752-763.
• D.O.R.A. (2012). San Francisco declaration on research assessment (DORA).
• Damşa, C. I. (2014). The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 247-281.
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners’ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
• Estalella A., & Sánchez Criado, T. (Eds.). (2018). Experimental Collaborations. Ethnography through Fieldwork Devices. New York: Berghahn.
• Fairhurst, G. T. y Cooren, F. (2009). Leadership as the hybrid production of presence(s). Leadership, 5(4), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715009343033
• Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1043-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005
• Fineman, S. (2003). Understanding Emotion at Work. London: SAGE.
• Finkel, L., Parra, P., y Baer, A. (2008). Entrevista abierta en investigación social: trayectorias profesionales de exdeportistas de élite. En Estrategias y prácticas cualitativas de investigación social. Madrid: Pearson.
• Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2008). Students’ meaning–making of socio–scientific issues in computer– mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1775-1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701543617.
• Gómez-Ferri, J.; y González-Alcaide, G. (2018). “Patrones y estrategias en la colaboración científica: la percepción de los investigadores”. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41(1), e199. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.1.1458
• Haas, E. B. (1980). “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes”. World Politics, 32, 357-405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010109
• Hackett, E. J. (2005). Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 787-826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705056045
• Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10291
• Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.) (1999): Positioning Theory: Moral contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Healey, M. P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2017). Making Strategy Hot. California Management Review, 59(3), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617712258
• Hechanova, R., & Cementina-Olpoc, R. (2013). Transformational Leadership, Change Management, and Commitment to Change: A Comparison of Academic and Business Organizations. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0019-z
• Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 9-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
• Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research Collaboration at a Distance: Changing Spatial Patterns of Scientific Collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 41(4), 520-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012
• Katz, J. S., & Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research Policy, 26, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Krange, I. (2007). Students’ conceptual practices in science education—Productive disciplinary interactions in a participation trajectory. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9040-y.
• Kwiek, M. (2020). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The construction of Scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Leydesdorff, L., & Milojević, S. (2015). Scientometrics. In M. Lynch (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Liebowitz, J. (2008). “Think of others” in knowledge management: making culture work for you. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500162
• Ludvigsen, S. (2010). Sociogenesis and cognition. The struggle between social and cognitive activities. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 302-318). New York: Routledge.
• Maestre, F. T. 2019. Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs. PLoS computational biology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006914
• Molas-Gallart, J., & Tang, P. (2011) Tracing ‘Productive Interactions’ to Identify Social Impacts: An Example from the Social Sciences. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 219-226.
• Mumford, M., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
• Newman, M. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
• Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor—an emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0
• Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12690298
• Raelin, J. A. (2013). The manager as facilitator of dialogue. Organization, 20(6), 818-839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412455085
• Remesal, A., & Colomina, R. (2013). Social presence in online small collaborative group work: a socioconstructivist account. Computers & Education, 60, 357-367. https://doi.org/S0360131512001698
• Sarmiento–Klapper, J. W. (2009). The sequential co–construction of the joint problem space. In G. Stahl, & Studying Virtual Math Team (Eds.), Computer–supported collaborative learning series (pp. 83-98). New York: Springer.
• Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31(5), 681-730 https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031005002
• Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 4, 643-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
• Spaapen, J., & van Drooge, L. (2011) Introducing ‘Productive Interactions’ in Social Impact Assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211-218.
• Sutherland, N. (2016). Investigating leadership ethnographically: Opportunities and potentialities. Leadership, 14(3), 263-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715016676446
• Tsai, C., Corley, E., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts. Scientometrics, 108(2), 505-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1997-z
• Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
• Valsiner, J. (1994). Bidirectional cultural transmission and constructive sociogenesis. In W. de Graaf & R. Maier (Eds.), Sociogenesis reexamined (pp. 47-70). New York: Springer.
• Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Van De Mieroop, D., Clifton, J, & Verhelst, A. (2020). Investigating the interplay between formal and informal leaders in a shared leadership configuration: A multimodal conversation analytical study. Human Relations, 73(4), 490-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719895077
• Verbree, M. (2011). Dynamics of Academic Leadership in Research Groups. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
• Vermeulen, N., Parker, J. N., & Penders, B. (2013). Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology. Endeavour, 37(3), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2013.03.001
• Wagner, C. S. (2018). The Collaborative Era in Science. Governing the Network. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Wellcome Trust. (2020). What researchers think about the culture they work. London: Wellcome Trust. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/what-researchers-think-about-the-culture-they-work-in.pdf
• Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Whitley, R. 2000. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.