Deconstructing geopolitics in the classroom. Grasping geopolitical codes through active learning

  1. Martini, Alice 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Revista española de ciencia política

ISSN: 1575-6548

Année de publication: 2022

Número: 60

Pages: 145-173

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21308/RECP.60.05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista española de ciencia política

Résumé

This article describes an activity I designed to allow students to grasp critical approaches in Geopolitics better. The activity is focused on the deconstruction of the US’ geopolitical code regarding the 2003 intervention in Iraq. The article describes the activity, and then evaluates students’ learning through four different kinds of review and assessment. Overall, the different assessments show that students managed to achieve the main learning outcomes of the activity—i.e., being able to reflect on this geopolitical code as a social construction legitimizing militaryaction. These assessments also show that students are able to apply what they learned in this specific activity to other geopolitical discourses —thus showing how the activity helpsthem develop critical thinking outside the classroom. In this sense, the article concludes that active learning can be helpful for instructors teaching critical approaches in International Relationsor other similar fields. Having students working with their knowledge allows learners to understand better how to produce critical analyses and to grasp their political weight.

Références bibliographiques

  • Citas Agnew, John. 1998. Geopolitics. Re-Visioning World Politics. London: Routledge.
  • Ambrose, Susan A., Michael W. Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C. Lovett and Marie K. Norman. 2010. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Anderson, Lorin W. and David R. Krathwohl (eds.). 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
  • Angelo, Thomas A. and K. Patricia Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bilgin, Pinar. 2004. “Whose Middle East’? Geopolitical Inventions and Practices of Security”, International Relations, 18 (1): 25-41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117804041739.
  • Bonwell, Charles and James A. Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
  • Cairo Carou, Heriberto. 2016. “Critical Geopolitics and the Decolonization of Area Studies”, in Encarnación Gutiérrez Rodriguez, Manuela Boatcă and Sérgio Costa (eds.), Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Clark, Ian. 2012. “Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-Regulated Learning”, Educational Psychology Review, 24 (2): 205-249. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.
  • Cleary, Timothy J. and Barry J. Zimmerman. 2004. “Self-Regulation Empowerment Program: A School-Based Program to Enhance Self-Regulated and Self-Motivated Cycles of Student Learning”, Psychology in the Schools, 41 (5): 537-550. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10177.
  • Culcasi, Karen. 2010. “Constructing and Naturalizing the Middle East”, Geographical Review, 100 (4): 583-597. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010. 00059.x.
  • Deardoff, Michelle D. 2013. “The Professor, Pluralism and Pedagogy”, Journal of Political Science Education, 9 (3): 366-373. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2013.796252.
  • Devlin, Marcia. 2006. “Challenging Accepted Wisdom about the Place of Conceptions of Teaching in University Teaching Improvement”, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18 (2): 112-119.
  • Díaz Sanz, Marina. 2019. Iran and the Geopolitical Imagination: A Discourse Analysis of the Spanish Contribution to the Debate on the Meaning of Modern Iran [doctoral dissertation]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=223843.
  • Díaz Sanz, Marina and Lucía Ferreiro Prado. 2021. “Orientalism is not my opinion: Decolonial Teaching and the problem of credibility in IR courses with a MENA focus”, Politics, online first. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211009068.
  • Dodds, Klaus. 2019. Geopolitics: A Very Short Introduction. 3rd ed. Very Short Introductions, 171. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198830764.001.0001.
  • Dunn, Kevin C. and Iver B. Neumann. 2016. Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Flint, Colin. 2017. Introduction to Geopolitics. 3rd ed. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Flint, Colin and Peter J. Taylor. 2018. Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality. Seventh edition. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315164380.
  • Giroux, Henry A. 2012. “Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy”, Policy Futures in Education, 8 (6): 715-721. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.715.
  • Giroux, Henry A. 2020. On Critical Pedagogy. 2nd ed. London; New York; Oxford; New Delhi; Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Hutchings, Pat. 1993. “Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning”, Assessment Update, 5 (1): 6-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/au.3650050104.
  • Ishiyama, John T., William J. Miller and Eszter Simon (eds.). 2015. Handbook on Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Jackson, Richard. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism. Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Khan, Alya and John Gabriel. 2018. “Resisting the Binary Divide in Higher Education: The Role of Critical Pedagogy”, Journal for Critical Education Policy, 16 (1): 30-58.
  • Lamy, Steven L. 2007. “Challenging Hegemonic Paradigms and Practices: Critical Thinking and Active Learning Strategies for International Relations”, PS: Political Science and Politics, 40 (1): 112-116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507250279.
  • Li, Darryl. 2020. “Teaching the Global War on Terror”, in Omnia El Shakry (ed.), Understanding and Teaching the Modern Middle East. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17nmzqj.
  • McCarthy, Patrick J. and Liam Anderson. 2000. “Active Learning Techniques versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science”, Innovative Higher Education, 24 (4): 279-294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047415.48495.05.
  • Mills, David and Patrick Alexander. 2013. Small Group Teaching: A Toolkit for Learning. The Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/Small_group_teaching_1.pdf [retrieved: October 27, 2021]
  • Moon, Jenny. 2005. Guide for Busy Academics No. 4: Learning Through Reflection. Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://nursing-midwifery.tcd.ie/assets/director-staff-edu-dev/pdf/Guide-for-Busy-Academics-No1-4-HEA.pdf [retrieved: October 27, 2021].
  • Nicol, David J. and Debra Macfarlane‐Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self‐regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice”, Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2): 199-218. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03075070600572090.
  • Ó Tuathail, Gearóid. 1996. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. London: Routledge.
  • Ó Tuathail, Gearóid. 1998a. “Introduction: Thinking Critically about Geopolitics”, in Gearóid Ó Tuathail, Simon Dalby and Paul (eds.), The Geopolitics Reader. London: Routledge.
  • Ó Tuathail, Gearóid. 1998b. “Postmodern Geopolitics? The Modern Geopolitical Imagination and Beyond”, in Gearóid Ó Tuathail and Simon Dalby (eds.), Rethinking Geopolitics. London: Routledge.
  • Petty, Geoff. 2022. “Orient, Present, Activity, Review”, Improve Your Teaching and That of Your Team [blog]. Available at: https://geoffpetty.com/ [retrieved: October 27, 2021].
  • Rawlins, Peter and Linda Leach. 2014. “Questions in Assessment for Learning and Teaching”, in Alison Margaret St. George, Seth Brown and John O”Neill (eds.), Facing the Big Questions in Teaching: Purpose, Power and Learning, 2nd ed. Auckland: Cengage Learning.
  • Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Routledge and Kegan Pail Ltd.
  • Woods, Nathan. 2015. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning”, Education, 2015. Available at: https://thejournalofeducation.wordpress.com/2015/05/20/formative-assessment-and-self-regulated-learning/ [retrieved: October 27, 2021].
La source de données: Dialnet