Métricas del ritmo aplicadas al estudio dialectológico del español

  1. Mario Casado-Mancebo 1
  2. José María Lahoz-Bengoechea 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain)
Revista:
Estudios de fonética experimental

ISSN: 2385-3573,  1575-5533

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 31

Páginas: 31-44

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Estudios de fonética experimental

Resumen

This paper reviews previous studies about dialectal variation of rhythm in Spanish and aims to analyse possible differences among Spanish spoken in Andalusia, Madrid, and Galicia. Four of the rhythm metrics present in the literature were used in the analysis. Spontaneous speech, by contrast with reading tasks, did allow us to discriminate among varieties, albeit only in the case of vowel duration measures. Drawing on the different effect of task on the results, two possible conceptions of rhythm are discussed: language rhythm (as a phonological property) and speech rhythm (as a phonetic property). It is argued that so-called rhythm metrics may be more related to the latter or may even reflect phonotactic rather than rhythmic properties.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Aldine.
  • Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 351-373.
  • Barry, W., Andreeva, B., & Koreman, J. (2009). Do rhythm measures reflect perceived rhythm? Phonetica, 66(1-2), 78-94.
  • Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Foris.
  • Bertinetto, P. M. (1989). Reflections on the dichotomy "stress" vs. "syllable-timing". Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 91(93), 99- 130.
  • Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5:9(10), 341-345.
  • Classe, A. (1939). The rhythm of English prose. Basil Blackwell.
  • Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 218-236.
  • Cutler, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). The periodicity bias. Journal of Phonetics, 21(1/2), 103-108.
  • Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(1), 113- 121.
  • Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllabletiming reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11(1), 51-62.
  • Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for deltaC. En P. Karnowski, & I. Szigeti (Eds.), Language and language processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistics Colloquium (pp. 231-241). Peter Lang.
  • Fletcher, J. (2010). The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. En W. J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, & F. E. Gibbon (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (2.a ed., pp. 523-602). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Fox, A. (2000). Prosodic Features and prosodic structure: The phonology of "suprasegmentals". Oxford University Press.
  • Frota, S., & Vigário, M. (2001). On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese case. Probus, 13, 247-275.
  • Fuchs, R. (2016). Speech rhythm in varieties of English: Evidence from educated Indian English and British English. Springer.
  • Gick, B. (2003). Articulatory correlates of ambisyllabicity in English glides and liquids. En J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Phonetic interpretation (pp. 222-236). Cambridge University Press.
  • Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis. En C. Gussenhoven, & N. L. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology (Vol. 7, pp. 515-546). Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Hayes, B. (1981). A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules [Tesis doctoral]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Estados Unidos de América.
  • Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. En K. Johnson, & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145-165). Academic Press.
  • Jun, S.-A. (2005). Prosodic typology. En S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 430-458). Oxford University Press.
  • Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English [Tesis doctoral]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Estados Unidos de América.
  • Köpke, B., & Schmid, M. (2004). Language attrition: The next phase. En M. Schmid, B. Köpke, M. Keijzer, & L. Weilemar (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 1- 43). John Benjamins.
  • Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. Oxford University Press.
  • Ladefoged, P., Draper, M. H., & Whitteridge, D. (1958). Syllables and stress. International Phonetic Association Miscellanea Phonetica, 3, 1-14.
  • Lahoz-Bengoechea, J. M. (2015). Fonética y fonología de los fenómenos de refuerzo consonántico en el seno de las unidades léxicas en español [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España.
  • Lahoz-Bengoechea, J. M. (en prensa). Prosodic variation I: The syllable. En Á. J. Gallego, & C. Sánchez López (Eds.), A guide to Spanish dialects: Descriptive and theoretical aspects of linguistic variation in the Hispanic world (cáp. 20). Oxford University Press.
  • Lahoz-Bengoechea, J. M., & Jiménez-Bravo, M. (enviado). Spoken word boundary detection in ambiguous resyllabification contexts in Spanish.
  • Lahoz-Bengoechea, J. M., Tuninetti, A., & Escudero, P. (2019). Spoken word recognition by English-speaking learners of Spanish. En S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, 2019 (pp. 2243-2247). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.
  • Lloyd James, A. (1940). Speech signals in telephony. Pitman.
  • Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(3), 298- 305.
  • Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (2007). Prosodic phonology. With a new foreword (2nd ed.). Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Nolan, F., & Asu, E. L. (2009). The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica, 66(1-2), 64-77.
  • O’Rourke, E. (2008a). Speech rhythm variation in dialects of Spanish: Applying the Pairwise Variability Index and Variation Coefficients to Peruvian Spanish. En Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil, May 6-9, 2008 (pp. 431-434). ISCA.
  • O’Rourke, E. (2008b). Correlating Speech Rhythm in Spanish: Evidence from Two Peruvian Dialects. En Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 276- 287). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  • Ortega-García, J., González-Rodríguez, J., & Marrero Aguiar, V. (2000). AHUMADA: A large speech corpus in Spanish for speaker characterization and identification. Speech Communication, 31(2-3), 255-264.
  • Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 258-278.
  • Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford University Press.
  • Pike, K. (1945). The intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press.
  • Ramus, F. (2002). Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm: Perspectives. En B. Bell, & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence (pp. 115- 120). Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
  • Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(1), 265-292.
  • Ríos, A. (en prensa). El ritmo: Descripción fonética y variación. En J. Gil Fernández, & J. Llisterri (Eds.), Fonética y fonología descriptivas de la lengua española (cáp. 36). Georgetown University Press.
  • Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. En D. Crystal (Ed.), Linguistic Controversies (pp. 73-79). Arnold.
  • Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Mehler, J. (1981). Phoneme monitoring, syllable monitoring and lexical access. British Journal of Psychology, 72(4), 471-477.
  • Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and Syntax. The relation between sound and structure. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193-247.
  • Toledo, G. (2010a). Métricas rítmicas en discursos peninsulares. Boletín de Lingüística, 22(33), 88-113.
  • Toledo, G. (2010b). Métricas rítmicas en tres dialectos Amper-España. Estudios filológicos, 45, 93-110.
  • Wiget, L., White, L., Schuppler, B., Grenon, I., Rauch, O., & Mattys, S. L. (2010). How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm?. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1559- 1569.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet