L’analisi della conversazione per valutare l’autenticità dei materiali audio per l’insegnamento dell’italiano L2 : una proposta metodologica

Referencias bibliográficas

• Riferimenti
• Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 479–507.
• Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, & Selting, Margret (2018). Interactional linguistics. Studying language in social interactions. Cambridge University Press.
• De Stefani, Elwys (2011). «Ah, petta ecco io prendo questi che mi piacciono». Agire come coppia al supermercato. Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo studio dei processi decisionali. Aracne.
• De Stefani, Elwys (2016). Niente nel parlato conversazionale. Pratiche interazionali e processi di grammaticalizzazione di un segnale discorsivo. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 132, 206–31.
• De Stefani, Elwys, & Mondada, Lorenza (2018). Encounters in public spaces: How acquainted versus unacquainted persons establish social and spatial arrangements. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 248–270.
• Drew, Paul, & Heritage, John (a cura di) (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. (Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, 8.). Cambridge University Press.
• Ford, Cecilia E., & Fox, Barbara A. (2010). Multiple practices for constructing laughables. In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber & Margret Selting (a cura di), Prosody in interaction (pp. 339–68). John Benjamins.
• Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., & Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics, 6(3), 427–454.
• Fuschi, Laura (2013). Discourse markers in spoken Italian. The functions of senti and guarda. Tesi di dottorato, Universität Bielefeld.
• Gardner, Rod (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. John Benjamins.
• Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
• Gillani, Eugenio, & Pernas, Paloma (2013). Input orale e competenza dialogica: le scelte dei manuali di italiano LS. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica e applicata, 42(1), 61–99.
• Gillani, Eugenio, & Pernas, Paloma (2014). La trasmissione del parlato nei libri di testo di italiano LS: dall’oralità madrelingua all’input orale. In Atti del XII Congresso SILFI Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana (pp. 461–469). Franco Cesati Editore.
• Goffman, Erving (1981). Footing. In Erving Goffman (Ed.), Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Goffman, Erving (2008). Il comportamento in pubblico (1971). Einaudi.
• Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie H. (2004). Participation. In Alessandro Duranti (a cura di), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Blackwell.
• Heldner, Mattias, & Edlund, Jens (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568.
• Hepburn, Alexa, & Bolden, Galina (2017). Transcribing for social research. SAGE.
• Heritage, John (1984a). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
• Heritage, John (1984b). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In John Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (a cura di), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.
• Huth, Torsten, & Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen (2006). How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics?. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 53–79.
• Hymes, Dell (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(1), 8–38.
• Jefferson, Gail (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In Valentina D’Urso (a cura di), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). CLEUP.
• Jefferson, Gail (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In George Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). Irvington.
• Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey, & Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1977). Preliminary notes on the sequential organization of laughter (Pragmatics microfiche). Cambridge University, Department of Linguistics.
• Kendrick, Kobin, & Torreira, Francisco (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 255–289.
• Kramsch, Claire (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 366–372.
• Liddicoat, Anthony J. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis. Continuum.
• Pauletto, Franco, & Ferroni, Roberta (in preparazione). Usare l’analisi della conversazione per analizzare il discorso dei video didattici per l’insegnamento dell’italiano L2.
• Pernas, Paloma, Gillani, Eugenio, & Cacchione, Annamaria (2011). Costruire testi, strutturare conversazioni: la didattica dei segnali discorsivi come elementi pivot dell’interazione verbale. Italiano LinguaDue, 1, 65–138.
• Pike, Kenneth L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. Mouton.
• Pomerantz, Anita (1975). Second assessments. A study of some features of agreements/disagreements [Tesi di dottorato inedita]. University of California Irvine.
• Pomerantz, Anita (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (a cura di) Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.
• Potter, Jonathan, & Hepburn, Alexa (2010). Putting aspiration into words: “Laugh particles,” managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1543–1555.
• Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2014) What “What?” tells us about how conversationalists manage intersubjectivity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 109–129.
• Sacks, Harvey (1987). On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (a cura di) Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Multilingual Matters.
• Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation (a cura di Gail Jefferson) (Vols. 1 & 2). Blackwell.
• Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emmanuel A., & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone openings. In George Psathas (a cura di), Everyday language (pp. 23–78). Erlbaum.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111–151.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (2000a). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (2000b). When ’others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205–243.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, & Sacks, Harvey (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A., Koshik, Irene, Jacoby, Sally, & Olsher, David (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3–31.
• Schegloff, Emmanuel A., & Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289–327.
• Stivers, Tanya, & Rossano, Federico (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.
• Terasaki, Alene K. (2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Gene H. Lerner (a cura di), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–223). John Benjamins.
• Wong, Jane (2002). “Applying” conversation analysis in applied linguistics: evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40(1), 37–60.