Do the business and finance spanish journals cover high-impact topics? a co-keyword analysis

  1. Pilar Abad 1
  2. Jorge Cruz 1
  3. M. Dolores Robles 2
  1. 1 aUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

ISSN: 0534-3232

Any de publicació: 2022

Número: 28

Pàgines: 101-126

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.26360/2022_4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Altres publicacions en: Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

Resum

This paper investigates the extent to which the topics covered in Spanish journals from the field of Business and Finance published between 2010 and 2020 correspond to the topics with the highest international impact. To this end, the degree of similarity between the topics published in the journals with the highest international impact according to the JCR and SJR indexes and the topics published in a set of Spanish journals is analysed. The topics are identified using the keywords provided by the authors and the degree of similarity between the research topics is determined using a word cooccurrence analysis. The results show that although Spanish journals are broader in terms of topics, the topics covered in them are among the leading topics according to the JCR and SJR and that there is a direct relationship between the topics and their degree of influence or impact.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Argilés, J. M.; Garcia-Blandon, J. (2011). Accounting research: A critical view of the present situation and prospects. Revista de Contabilidad, 14(2), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(11)70026-7
  • Arquero, J. L.; Jiménez-Cardoso, S. M.; Laffarga-Briones, J. (2017). Research Patterns of successful accounting academics in Spain. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 46(3), 327-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2017.1287462
  • Chaparro-Martínez, E.; Álvarez-Muñoz, P.; D’Armas-Regnault, M. (2017). Gestión de la información: Uso de las bases de datos Scopus y Web of Science con fines académicos. Universidad Ciencia y Tecnología, 20(81). http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1316-48212016000400003
  • Cheng, Q.; Wang, J.; Lu, W.; Huang, Y.; Bu, Y. (2020). Keyword-citationkeyword network: a new perspective of discipline knowledge structure analysis. Scientometrics, 124(3), 1923-1943. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03576-5
  • Cordón-García, J. A.; Martín-Rodero, H.; Alonso-Arévalo, J. (2009). Gestores de referencias de última generación: análisis comparativo de RefWorks, EndNote Web y Zotero. El profesional de la información, 18(4), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.jul.14
  • Donthu, N.; Reinartz, W.; Kumar, S.; Pattnaik, D. (2021). A retrospective review of the first 35 years of the International Journal of Research in Marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 232-266. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.006
  • Ennas, G.; Biggio, B.; Di Guardo, M. C. (2015). Data-driven journal metaranking in business and management. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1911-1929. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1751-y
  • Farinha, L.; Sebastião, J. R.; Sampaio, C.; Régio, M. (2020). Flipping the Best Journals in Accounting, Business, and Finance: What Fruits Do We Collect? In Handbook of Research on Accounting and Financial Studies, 1-21. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2136-6.ch001
  • Gallegos, M. C.; Peralta, C. A.; Guerrero, W. M. (2017). Utility of Bibliographic Managers in Organization of Information for Research Purposes. Formación universitaria, 10(5), 77-87. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/formuniv/v10n5/art09.pdf
  • He, F.; Fu, T.; Lucey, B. (2021). Geographic diversity in academic finance editorial boards-A discussion. Finance Research Letters, 43, 102006.
  • Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54, 427–432.
  • Hu, J.; Zhang, Y. (2015). Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis. Information processing & management, 51(4), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.02.002
  • Larivière, V.; Archambault, É.; Gingras, Y.; Vignola-Gagné, É. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20349
  • Li, M. (2018). Classifying and ranking topic terms based on a novel approach: Role differentiation of author keywords. Scientometrics, 116(1), 77–100. http://10.1007/s11192-018-2741-7
  • Li, Q.; Zhang, H.; Hong, X. (2020). Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions. International Review of Economics & Finance, 66, 154-165. http://10.1016/j.iref.2019.11.007
  • Magurran, A.E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Malden http://www.bionica.info/Biblioteca/Magurran2004MeasuringBiological.pdf
  • Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
  • Rodríguez-Yunta, L.; Giménez Toledo, E. (2013). Fusión, coedición o reestructuración de revistas científicas en humanidades y ciencias sociales. El profesional de la información, 22(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2013.ene.05
  • Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707-719. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2007.0213
  • Tuomisto, H. (2017). Defining, Measuring, and Partitioning Species Diversity, Reference Module in Life Sciences. Elsevier.
  • Vera-Baceta, M. A.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121, 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
  • Xiong, T.; Zhou, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X. (2022). Mining semantic information of co-word network to improve link prediction performance. Scientometrics, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04247-9
  • Xu, J.; Bu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, H.; Yu, C.; Sun, L. (2018). Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: A case study on joint attention. Scientometrics, 117(2), 973–995. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2897-1
  • Zhang, J.; Yu, Q.; Zheng, F.; Long, C.; Lu, Z.; Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet