La acumulación por desposesión presente en las estrategias extractivistas y de conservación hegemónicas en la Amazonía brasileña desde un estructuralismo marxista y ecofeminista

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acosta, A. (2011). Extractivismo y neoextractivismo: dos caras de la misma maldición. Más allá del desarrollo, 1, 83-118.
• Alston, L. J., Libecap, G. D. y Mueller, B. (1999). Titles, conflict, and land use: The development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian Amazon frontier. Detroit: University of Michigan Press.
• Araujo, C., Bonjean, C. A., Combes, J. L., Motel, P. C., y Reis, E. J. (2011). Property rights and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological economics, 68(8-9), 2461-2468.
• Ashman, S. (2009). Capitalism, uneven and combined development and the transhistoric. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(1), 29-46.
• Barca, S. (2020). Forces of reproduction: Notes for a counter-hegemonic anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Becker, B. K. (1988). «Significância contemporânea da fronteira: uma interpretação geopolítica a partir da Amazônia Brasileira», pp. 60-89, en Catherine Aubertin (org.), Fronteiras. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
• Becker, B. K. (2016). Geopolitics of the Amazon. Area Development and Policy, 1(1), 15-29.
• Benjaminsen, T. A. y Bryceson, I. (2012). Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 335-355.
• Bennholdt-Thomsen, V. (2016). A subsistence perspective for the transition to a new civilization: an ecofeminist contribution to degrowth. Canadian Woman Studies, 31(1): 20-26.
• Braudel, F. (1995). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II: Volume II (Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and planning D: Society and space, 16(4), 459-481.
• Brown, K. y Fortnam, M. (2018) «Gender and ecosystem services: a blind spot», pp. 257-272, en Kate Schreckenberg, Georgina Mace and Mahesh Poudyal (eds.), Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation. Londres: Routledge.
• Brundtland Comission (1987) Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, UN, Oslo: Oxford University Press.
• Bumpus, A. G. y Liverman, D. M. (2008). Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic geography, 84(2), 127-155.
• Bumpus, A. G. y Liverman, D. M. (2010). «Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development», pp. 203-224, en Richard Peet, Paul Robbins y Michael J. Watts (eds.), Global Political Ecology. Nueva York: Routledge.
• Büscher, B. y Dressler, W. (2012). Commodity conservation: the restructuring of community conservation in South Africa and the Philippines. Geoforum, 43(3), 367-376.
• Büscher, B. y Fletcher, R. (2015). Accumulation by conservation. New political economy, 20(2), 273-298.
• Byres, T. (1997). Capitalism from above and capitalism from below: An essay in comparative political economy. Nueva York: Springer.
• Carlassare, E. (2000). Socialist and cultural ecofeminism: Allies in resistance. Ethics and the Environment, 5(1), 89-106.
• Da Rocha, D. F., Porto, M. F., Pacheco, T. y Leroy, J. P. (2018). The map of conflicts related to environmental injustice and health in Brazil. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 709-719.
• De Angelis, M. (2001). Marx and primitive accumulation: The continuous character of capital’s ‘enclosures’. The commoner, 2(1), 1-22.
• Doane, M. (2012). Stealing shining rivers: agrarian conflict, market logic, and conservation in a Mexican forest. Phoenix: University of Arizona Press.
• Doane, M. (2014). From community conservation to the lone (forest) ranger: accumulation by conservation in a Mexican forest. Conservation and Society, 12(3), 233-244.
• Federici, S. (2010). Calibán y la bruja. Mujeres, cuerpo y acumulación originaria. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
• Felli, R. (2014). On climate rent. Historical Materialism, 22(3-4), 251-280.
• Friesen Wolfstone, I. (2015). Deconstructing necrophilia: An ecofeminist contribution to growth. Canadian Woman Studies, 31(1/2), 7.
• Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist formations, 23(2), 26-53.
• Garcés, A. (2006). Relaciones de género en la amazonía ecuatoriana: estudios de caso en comunidades indígenas Achuar, Shuar y Kichua. Quito: Editorial Abya Yala.
• Glassman, J. (2006). Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession, accumulation by ‘extra-economic’ means. Progress in human geography, 30(5), 608-625.
• Gough, A. y Whitehouse, H. (2020). Challenging amnesias: Re-collecting feminist new materialism/ecofeminism/climate/education. Environmental Education Research, 26(9-10), 1420-1434.
• Greco, E. y Apostolopoulou, E. (2020). Value, rent, and nature: The centrality of class. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(1), 46-51.
• Guedes, G. R., Brondízio, E. S., Barbieri, A. F., Anne, R., Penna-Firme, R. y D’Antona, Á. O. (2012). Poverty and inequality in the rural Brazilian Amazon: a multidimensional approach. Human ecology, 40(1), 41-57.
• Hall, D. (2013). Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession and the global land grab. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1582-1604.
• Harvey, D. (1981). The spatial fix-Hegel, Von Thunen, and Marx. Antipode, 13(3), 1-12.
• Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the «spatial fix». Geographische revue: Zeitschrift für Literatur und Diskussion, 3(2), 23-30.
• Harvey, D. (2002). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. Routledge.
• Harvey, D. (2005). The ‘new’imperialism: accumulation by dispossession. Nueva York: Routledge.
• Herod, A. (1997). From a geography of labor to a labor geography: Labor’s spatial fix and the Geography of capitalism. Antipode, 29(1), 1-31.
• Herrero, Y. (2012). Golpe de estado en la biosfera: los ecosistemas al servicio del capital. Investigaciones feministas, 2, 215-238.
• Hecht, S. B. (1985). Environment, development and politics: capital accumulation and the livestock sector in eastern Amazonia. World development, 13(6), 663-684.
• Hecht, S. B. (2011). From eco-catastrophe to zero deforestation? Interdisciplinarities, politics, environmentalisms and reduced clearing in Amazonia. Environmental conservation, 39(1), 4-19.
• Igoe, J., Neves, K. y Brockington, D. (2010). A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: Theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode, 42(3), 486-512.
• Isla, A. (2009). The eco-class-race struggles in the Peruvian Amazon Basin: an ecofeminist perspective. Capitalism nature socialism, 20(3), 21-48.
• Isla, A. (2015). The «Greening» of the UN Framework on climate change and environmental racism: what payment for ecosystem services means for peasants and indigenous peoples, women and men. Canadian Woman Studies, 31(1/2), 34-43.
• Jessop, B. (2006). Spatial Fixes, Temporal Fixes and Spatio-Temporal Fixes (pp. 142- 166). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.
• Kelly, A.B (2011) «Conservation practice as primitive accumulation». Journal of Peasant Studies, 38 (4): 683-701.
• Kumi, E., Arhin, A. A. y Yeboah, T. (2014). Can post-2015 sustainable development goals survive neoliberalism? A critical examination of the sustainable development – neoliberalism nexus in developing countries. Environment, development and sustainability, 16(3), 539-554.
• Lenin, V. I. (1974 [1899]). El desarrollo del capitalismo en Rusia. Madrid: Akal.
• Loaiza, T., Nehren, U. y Gerold, G. (2016). REDD+ implementation in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Why land configuration and common-pool resources management matter. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 67-79.
• Luxemburgo, R. (1967 [1912]). La Acumulación del capital. México: Grijalbo. Martinez-Alier, J., Demaria, F., Temper, L. y Walter, M. (2016). Changing social metabolism and environmental conflicts in India and South America. Journal of Political Ecology, 23(1), 467-491.
• Marx, K. (1975 [1867]). El capital: Libro I. México: Siglo XXI. Marx, K. y Engels, F. (1974). La ideología alemana. México: Ediciones Grijalbo.
• Meadows, D.; Meadows, D.; Randers, J.; Behrens, W. W. (1972) The limits to growth: a report to the Club of Rome, Michigan Institute of Technology.
• Mies, M. y Shiva, V. (2014) Ecofeminismo. Barcelona: Icaria. Miola, I; De Oliveira, G.; Prol, F.; Ferrando, T.; Vecchione-Gonçalves, M. y Herrera, H. (2021) «Bonos verdes en la ecología-mundo: capital, naturaleza y poder en la expansión financiarizada de la industria forestal en Brasil». Relaciones Internacionales 46: 161-180
• Moore, J. W. (2011a). Transcending the metabolic rift: a theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1), 1-46.
• Moore, J. W. (2011b). Ecology, capital, and the nature of our times: accumulation & crisis in the capitalist world-ecology. Journal of World-Systems Research, 107-146.
• Moore, J. W. (2020). El capitalismo en la trama de la vida: ecología y acumulación de capital. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
• Muradian, R. y Martinez-Alier, J. (2001). Globalization and poverty: an ecological perspective. Berlim: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
• Peck, J. y Tickell, A. (1994). Searching for a new institutional fix: the after-Fordist crisis and the global-local disorder. Post-Fordism: a reader, 280-315.
• Perelman, M. (2013). Classical political economy: primitive accumulation and the social division of labor. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Phillips, M. (2016). Embodied care and planet earth: Ecofeminism, maternalism and postmaternalism. Australian Feminist Studies, 31(90), 468-485.
• Rey, P. P. (1982) «Class alliances». International Journal of Sociology, 12(2), 1-120. Salleh, A. (2017). Ecofeminism as politics: Nature, Marx and the postmodern. Londres:
• Zed Books Ltd. Samndong, R. A. y Kjosavik, D. J. (2017). Gendered forests: exploring gender dimensions in forest governance and REDD+ in Équateur Province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Ecology & society 22 (4): 1-13.
• Sempértegui, A. (2021). Indigenous women’s activism, ecofeminism, and extractivism: partial connections in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Politics & Gender, 17(1), 197-224.
• Smith, Neil (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
• Sullivan, S. (2009). Green capitalism, and the cultural poverty of constructing nature as service-provider. Radical anthropology, 3, 18-27.
• Svampa, M. N. (2013). Consenso de los Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. Buenos Aires: CONICET.
• Vallejo, I., Cielo, C. y García, F. (2019). Ethnicity, gender, and oil: Comparative dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Latin American Perspectives, 46(2), 182-198.
• Wallerstein, I. M. (2004). Capitalismo histórico y movimientos antisistémicos: un análisis de sistemas-mundo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
• Wood, E. M. (1999) The origin of capitalism: A longer view. Londres: Verso.