El nuevo concepto de privacidadla transformación estructural de la visibilidad

  1. Fernández Barbudo, Carlos 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Revista de estudios políticos

ISSN: 0048-7694

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 185

Pages: 139-167

Type: Article

DOI: 10.18042/CEPC/REP.185.05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista de estudios políticos

Abstract

The concept of privacy has been gaining prominence in public and academic debates as voices proclaiming its disappearance have increased due to the effects of information technologies. Unlike other boundary concepts —such as intimacy or private life—, this new concept of privacy features an emerging visibility regime that affects the configuration of Digital Public Space (DPS). Through the historical study of how this new concept has been formed, I uncover four dimensions of the context of experience that it gathers together: 1) the impossibility of secrecy in cyberspace, 2) the development of an economy of surveillance which has led to the hyperfragmentation of DPS and to the 3) transformation of visibility in this public sphere, and 4) the essentially reactive nature of the new concept of privacy.

Funding information

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • (2015). Top International Websites & Rankings.Quantcast.Com.Disponible En,
  • Internet of things (IoT) ecosystem study. (2015). IEEE Standards Association.Pisca-Taway.Disponible En,
  • The top 500 sites on the web. (2015). Alexa.Com.Disponible En,
  • Abellán, J. (2012). Política.Madrid: Alianza Editorial,
  • Agra Romero, M. X. (2008). Ciudadanía: ¿un Asunto De Familia? Isegoría, 38, 139-154.
  • Alonso, E. (2015). El Nuevo Leviatán.Una Historia Política De La Red,
  • Arendt, H. (1993). La Condición Humana,
  • Assange, J. (2013). Criptopunks: La Libertad y El Futuro De Internet,
  • Assange, J. (2006). Conspiracy as governance. Conspiracy as Governance,
  • Assange, J., Müller-Maguhn, A., & Zimmermann, J. (2013). Criptopunks: La libertad y el futuro de internet. Buenos Aires: Editorial Marea,
  • Ayenson, M., Wambach, D. J., Soltani, A., Good, N., & Hoofnagle, C. J. (2011). Flash cookies and privacy II: Now with HTML5 and ETag respawning. Flash Cookies and Privacy II: Now with HTML5 and ETag Respawning,
  • Barlow, J. P. (1996). Declaración De Independencia Del Ciberespacio,
  • Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671-732.
  • Béjar, H. (1988). El Ámbito Íntimo,
  • Beltrán, E. (1994). Público y privado (sobre feministas y liberales: Argumentes en un debate acerca de los límites de lo político). Doxa, 1(15-16), 389-405.
  • Benhabib, S. (2006). Modelos De Espacio Público.Hannah Arendt, La Tradición Liberal Y Jürgen Habermas, , 105-138.
  • Blankenship, L. (1986). The Conscience of a Hacker (Hacker’s Manifesto).Phrack, 1.Disponible En,
  • Bobbio, N. (1998). La Gran Dicotomía: Público/privado.En N.Bobbio.Estado, Gobierno Y Sociedad (Pp.11-38),
  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  • Braman, S. (2012). Privacy by design: Networked computing, 1969-1979. New Media and Society, 14(5), 798-814. doi:10.1177/1461444811426741
  • Brunner, O. (1976). «La "Casa Grande " y La "Oeconómica " De La Vieja Europa», En Nuevos Caminos De La Historia Social y Constitucional, , 87-123.
  • Calhoun, C. (1993). Civil society and the public sphere. Public Culture, 5(2), 267-280.
  • Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238-266.
  • Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(4), 1165-1188.
  • Dahlberg, L. (2007). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation. New Media and Society, 9(5), 827-847. doi:10.1177/1461444807081228
  • Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147-162. doi:10.1080/10584600590933160
  • Davis, R. (2001). Tecnologías de la comunicación & democracia: El factor internet. Cuadernos De Información & Comunicación, 6, 9-32.
  • Frawley, W., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Matheus, C. (1992). Knowledge discovery in databases: An overview. AI Magazine, (3), 57-70.
  • Fuchs, C. (2012). The political economy of privacy on facebook. Television and New Media, 13(2), 139-159. doi:10.1177/1527476411415699
  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198.
  • Garzón Valdés, E. (1998). Privacidad Y Publicidad.DOXA, Cuadernos De Filosofía Del Derecho, 1(21), 223-244.
  • Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media and Society, 15(8), 1348-1365. doi:10.1177/1461444812472322
  • Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack? Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367-382. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1
  • Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday, 2(4) doi:10.5210/fm.v2i4.519
  • Gomez, J., Pinnick, T., & Soltani, A. (2009). KnowPrivacy,
  • Grossi, G. (2011). The public sphere and communication flows in the era of the net. Nuovi Media, Nuova Politica Partecipazione E Mobilitazione Online Da Moveon Al Movimento Stelle,
  • Habermas, J. (1994). Historia y Crítica De La Opinión Pública,
  • Harvey, B. (1975). Leaving well enough alone. Disponible En,
  • Himanen, P. (2002). La Ética Del Hacker y El Espíritu De La Era De La Información,
  • Jones, S. (2003). Encyclopedia of New Media,
  • Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2018). Citizen-centered big data analysis-driven governance intelligence framework for smart cities. Telecommunications Policy, 42(10), 881-896. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.01.003
  • Juris, J. (2006). Movimientos sociales en red: Movimientos globales por una justicia global. La Sociedad Red: Una Visión Global, , 415-439.
  • Kim, B. -. (2005). Internationalizing the Internet: The Co-Evolution of Influence and Technology,
  • Koselleck, R. (1993). [1979].Futuro Pasado,
  • Koselleck, R. (1996). A response to comments on the geschichtliche grundbegriffe. The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, , 59-70.
  • Koselleck, R. (2004). Historia de los conceptos y conceptos de historia. Ayer, 53(53), 27-45.
  • Koselleck, R., & Gadamer, H. -. (1997). Historia y Hermenéutica,
  • Levy, S. (1993). Crypto Rebels,
  • Licklider, J. C. R., & Taylor, R. W. (1968). The computer as a communication device. Science and Technology, , 21-31.
  • May, T. C. (1994). Cyphernomicon.Cypherpunks.to.Disponible En,
  • May, T. C. (2001). 1992]. the crypto anarchist manifesto. en P. ludlow. Pirate Utopias (Pp.61-63).Cambridge,
  • Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You,
  • Patelis, K. (2000). The Political Economy of the Internet,
  • Pateman, C. (1983). Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy. Public and Private in Social Life,
  • Paths, E. (2017). Hidden Network: Detectando Redes Ocultas Con Los Dispositivos USB,
  • Pecourt Gracia, J. (2015). The digital public sphere and the political activism. [La esfera pública digital y el activismo político] Politica y Sociedad, 52(1), 75-98. doi:10.5209/rev-POSO.2015.v1.n52.45423
  • Rabotnikof, N. (2005). En Busca De Un Lugar Común.El Espacio Público En La Teoría Política Contemporá Nea,
  • Rathore, M. M., Paul, A., Ahmad, A., & Jeon, G. (2017). IoT-based big data: From smart city towards next generation super city planning. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 13(1), 28-47. doi:10.4018/IJSWIS.2017010103
  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier,
  • Roberts, B. (2012). Attention seeking: Technics, publics and free software individuation. Culture Machine, 13
  • Simmel, G. (2010). El Secreto y Las Sociedades Secretas,
  • Subirats, J. (2002). Los dilemas de una relación inevitable. innovación democrática y tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación. Democracia Digital.Límites y Oportunidades, , 89-111.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2003). República.Com.Internet, Democracia y Libertad,
  • Taylor, C. (2006). [1991].La Ética De La Autenticidad.Barcelona,
  • Terranova, T. (2012). Attention, economy and the brain. Culture Machine, 13(1), 1-19.
  • Thompson, J. (2011). Los límites cambiantes de la vida pública y privada. Comunicación y Sociedad, 15, 11-42.
  • Van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1997). Electronic communities: Global village or cyberbalkans? Electronic Communities: Global Village Or Cyberbalkans?,
  • van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society, 12(2), 197-208.
  • Van Dijk, J. (2000). Models of democracy and concepts of communication. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, , 30-53.
  • Warren, S., & Brandeis, L. (1995). El Derecho a La Intimidad,
  • Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.
  • Weintraub, J. (1997). The theory and politics of the Public/Private distinction. En J.Weintraub Y K.Kumar (Eds.).Public and Private in Thought and Practice, , 1-46.
  • Whelan, C. (2012). Big data and the democratisation of decisions: A report from the economist intelligence unit. The Economist.Disponible En,
  • Winner, L. (2003). Internet y los sueños de una renovación democrática. Isegoría, 28, 55-71.
  • Zimmermann, P. (1991). Why I wrote PGP. original 1991 PGP User’s guide. Disponible En,