Documentar la experiencia culturalautoetnografía como narración para proyectos de investigación-creación en artes escénicas

  1. Félix Gómez Urda González
Revista:
Ausart aldizkaria: arte ikerkuntzarako aldizkaria = journal for research in art = revista para la investigación en arte

ISSN: 2340-8510 2340-9134

Any de publicació: 2022

Títol de l'exemplar: Arteaz idatzi. Idazketa hedatua eta praktika artistikoa. Konexio, haustura eta lekualdaketak = Escribir de arte. Escritura expandida y práctica artística. Conexiones, quiebras y desplazamientos = Writing about art. Expanded writing and artistic practice. Connections, ruptures and displacements

Volum: 10

Número: 1

Pàgines: 235-247

Tipus: Article

Altres publicacions en: Ausart aldizkaria: arte ikerkuntzarako aldizkaria = journal for research in art = revista para la investigación en arte

Resum

Understanding the cultural experience of the community that one studies is one of the foundational objectives of social research. The description of such an experience can take various narrative forms within ethnography. This is the case of autoethnography, narrative for qualitative inquiry, where the researcher, as an active participant, documents and analyzes their own personal experience in response and relation to the studied subject or community. This approach reflects the subjectivity and sensibility of the researcher in their response to their subject and provides a clear account of the politics of engagement. This article frames theoretically and problematizes its use as a writing technique to question the position of researcher in both research-creation projects of performing arts: Todas las santas (2021) and TransMigrARTS(2022). Both were held in person, in the middle of the pandemic, in the Spanish cities of Madrid and Granada, respectively. In this paper, the author explores the embodied and existential tensions that arose in both experiences from his ambivalent position as are searcher-playwright when it comes to creating, prompting and inciting the game, but also when observing and analyzing what happened there.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Bárcenas Barajas, Karina & Nohemí Preza Carreño. 2019. “Desafíos de la etnografía digital en el trabajo de campo onlife”. Virtualis 10(18). https://doi. org/10.2123/virtualis.v10i18.287
  • Denzin, Norman Kent. 2006. “The politics and ethics of performative pedagogy: Toward a pedagogy of hope”. En The Sage handbook of performance studies, edited by D. Soyini Madison, Judith Hamera. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976145.n18
  • Geertz, Clifford. (1973) 1999. La interpretación de las culturas. Traducción, Alberto L. Bixio. Barcelona: Gedisa
  • Gómez-Urda, Félix, 2021. Escribir: Notas de un viaje a la autoetnografía. Madrid: Las Hedonistas
  • Hayano, David M. (1979) 2004. “Autoethnography: Paradigms, problems and prospects”. En The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman & Tim Futing Liao, editors. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage
  • Heider, Karl G. 1975. “What do people do? Dani auto-ethnography”. Journal of Anthropological Research 31(1): 3-17. https://www.journals.uchicago. edu/doi/abs/10.1086/jar.31.1.3629504
  • Holman, Stacy, Tony E. Adams & Carolyn Ellis, eds. (1966) 2013. Handbook of autoethnography. Walnut Creek CA: Left Coast
  • Léroux, Louis Patrick, 2013. “El investigador-creador frente a sus respuestas resonantes”. Traductora, Andrea Pelegrí Kristic. Apuntes de Teatro 138: 69–83. http://ojs.uc.cl/index.php/RAT/article/view/32267
  • Marcus, George E. & Michael M.J. Fischer. (1986) 2000. La antropología como critica cultural: Un momento experimental en las ciencias humanas. Traducción, Eduardo Sinnott. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu
  • Naukkarinen, Ossi, 2012. “Variations on artification”. “Artification”, special vol. of Contemporary Aesthetics 4. https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/ liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol0/iss4/2
  • Preciado, Paul B. 2008. Testo yonki. Pozuelo de Alarcón: Espasa Calpe
  • Rógozov, Leonid Ivánovich. 1964. “Self operation”. Soviet Antarctic Expedition Information Bulletin, 223-224. http://corpus.leeds.ac.uk/serge/rogozov-1964.pdf
  • Ruiz Olabuénaga, José Ignacio. 2009. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Deusto.
  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1986. “Imperialism and sexual difference”. Oxford Litterary Review 1/2: 225–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43964608