ImpactboarEvaluación del impacto del jabalí (Sus scrofa) sobre las comunidades de prados, regeneración del arbolado y especies animales clave en el Parque Nacional de Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici

  1. Josep María Espelta
  2. Carme Rosell 1
  3. Alberto Muñoz 2
  4. Ferrán Navàs
  5. Marc Fernández-Bou
  6. Pau Sunyer
  7. Guillem Bagaria
  8. Raúl Bona 3
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  3. 3 Universidad de Extremadura
    info

    Universidad de Extremadura

    Badajoz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0174shg90

Llibre:
Proyectos de investigación en parques nacionales: 2011-2014

Editorial: Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales ; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino

ISBN: 978-84-8014-898-6

Any de publicació: 2016

Pàgines: 307-320

Tipus: Capítol de llibre

Resum

The expansion of wild boar in Europe has also resulted in an increase in mountain areas, where it hasbeen observed above 2.000 m in summer. However, there is little information on habitat use and theimpact of wild boar in these ecosystems. IMPACTBOAR analyzed the seasonal use by wild boar of thedifferent habitats in the Parque Nacional de Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici, and its impact on:(1) plant communities of meadows, (2) recruitment of tree species, (3) demography of relevant rodentsfor seed dispersal (Apodemus spp.), and (4) predation of endangered species (e.g. capercaille, Tetrao urogallus). Results showed that wild boar presence in the Park has slightly declined in comparison to previous studies (2004-2005), being higher in spring and summer, lower in autumn and very scarce inwinter. Wild boar presence changes in the different habitats according to the season: i.e. it is higher inconiferous forests and meadows in summer; it increases in shrublands in spring and in deciduous forests during autumn. Wild boar activity is always higher in sites with southern exposure and areas withhigher diversity of land cover categories. The analysis of rootings indicated: i) large interannual variability in the amount of disturbed area (from 5 to 26%), ii) decrease in hemicryptophytes, increase in therophytes and slight decrease in geophytes, III) lower species richness, local diversity and differentiationof the vertical structure in rooting areas, but a higher overall diversity and, iii) no impact on the commonest species but trivialization of the flora, by an increase of cosmopolitan species. In contrast, theimpact on tree species and forest regneration was scarce. Also, wild boar activity did not affect the presence of rodents (dormice, voles and mice), which are usually distributed in areas not accessible (rockyareas), nor did we detect the consumption of capercaille.