Management of Surgical Waiting Lists in Public Hospitals

  1. Rodríguez Uría, M. V. 2
  2. Arenas Parra, M. 1
  3. Bilbao Terol, A. 1
  4. Cerdá Tena, E. 3
  1. 1 Dpto. Economía Cuantitativa. Universidad de Oviedo.
  2. 2 Dpto. Economía Cuantitativa. Universidad de Oviedo
  3. 3 Dpto. de Análisis Económico. Universidad Complutense, Madrid
Zugehörigkeit anzeigen +
Buch:
Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making
  1. Haimes, Yacov Y. (ed. lit.)
  2. Steuer, Ralph E. (ed. lit.)

Verlag: Springer

ISSN: 0075-8442

ISBN: 9783642573118,  978-3-540-67266-1

Datum der Publikation: 2000

Seiten: 473-482

Art: Buch-Kapitel

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57311-8_40 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Hospitals are considered public utility companies and are supposed to be nonprofit institutions [12]; usually they function in a political and highly complex environment. Managerial authority is shared between doctors and administrators and each of the two groups aims to formulate its own individual policies and pursue objectives that may not coincide or may even be in direct opposition to one another [1]. This situation is certain to affect hospital performance and it must be taken into account when proposing any kind of results analysis. Improving the efficiency of Hospital performance, establishing quantitative target values to those objectives, some of them involving intangible benefits, is the main objective of any Hospital Administration [10]. The purpose of this study is to analyze through the M.C.D.M. approach [7], the inner coherency of the goals expressed by administrative Authorities. Also, applying Multicriteria Decision techniques we intend to design the real performance of surgical services at a local general hospital offering the decision centre a suitable methodology that allows us to analyze whether or not it is possible to improve the running of the services, taking into account all the real constraints, e.g. space, staff availability and financial support.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Andersen Consulting (1993): “The Future of European Health Care”. A study by Andersen Consulting in Co-operation with Burson-Marsteller.
  • Arenas, M.; Bilbao, A.; Rodriguez, M.V. (1992): “Aplicación de la programación por objetivos a la toma de decisiones de un centro de salud”. VI Reunión Anual ASEPELT — ESPAÑA. Granada.
  • Arenas, M.; Lafuente, E.; RodrÍGuez UrÍA, M.V. (1997). “Goal Programming model for evaluating an Hospital service performance”. Advances in Multiple Objective and Goal Programming. Ed. Caballero/ Ruiz/ Steuer. Springer
  • Bertsekas, D. (1995): “Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control”.Vol. 1. Athena Scientific.
  • Bitran, G.R.; Valor-Sabatier, J. (1987): “Some Mathematical Programming Based Measures of Efficiency in Health Care Institutions”. Advances in Mathematical Programming and Financial Planning. Vol 1: 61–84.
  • Chae, Y.; Suver, J.; Chou, D. (1985): “Goal programming as a capital investment tool for teaching hospitals”. HCM review, Winter, 27–35.
  • Charnes. A; Cooper, W.W. (1977) “Goal Programming multiple objetive optimization”, part 1. European Journal of Operational Research 1, 39–54.
  • Donabedian, A (1984). L? calidad de la atención médica: Definición y métodos de evaluación. Ed.Cientifica la Prensa Médica. Mexicana S.A.; Mèxico D. C.
  • Franz, L.; Baker, H.; Leong, G.K.; Rakes, T.R. (1989): “A Mathematical Modelfor Scheduling and Staffing Multiclinic Health Regions”. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 277–287.
  • Lee, S. (1973): “An Aggregative Resource Allocation Model for Hospital Administration”. Socio-Economic Planning Science. Vol. 7, 381–395.
  • OrtÙn Rubio, V; (1990) La economia en sanidad y medicina: Instrumentos y limitaciones. Ed. Euge, Barcelona.
  • Watch, R.F.; Whitford, D.T. (1976): “A Goal Programming Model for Capital Investment Analysis in Nonprofit Hospitals”. Financial Management 5: 37–56.
  • Whittle, E (1982): Optimization over time. Vol 1 and 2. J.Wiley.