Mathematics Attitudes in Computerized Environments

  1. Inés Mª Gómez-Chacón 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Libro:
Model-Centered Learning

Editorial: Springer

ISBN: 9789460916182

Año de publicación: 2011

Páginas: 145-168

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-618-2_11 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aiken, R.L. & Aiken, D.R. (1969) Recent research on attitudes concerning science. Science Education, 53, 295–305.
  • Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274.
  • Camacho, M. & Depool, R. (2002). Students’ attitudes towards mathematics and computer when using DERIVE in the learning of Calculus concepts. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 9 (4), 259–283.
  • Cretchley, P. & Galbraith, P. (2002). Mathematics or computers? Confidence or motivation? How do these relate to achievement?, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on the Teaching of Math. (Undergrad.), CD and online, Wiley, Crete.
  • DeBellis V.A. & Goldin G.A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem solving', In E. Pehkonen (Ed.) Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki, pp. 209–216.
  • Di Martino P. & Zan R. (2001). Attitude toward mathematics: some theoretical issues. Proceedings of PME 25 (Utrecht, Netherlands), vol.3, 351–358.
  • Emprin,F. (2007).Formation initiale et continue pour l’enseignement des mathématiques avec les TICE: cadre d’analyse des formations et ingénierie didactique Thèse de didactique des disciplines.UniversitéParis VII –Denis Diderot.
  • Forgasz, H.J. (2003). Girls, boys, and computers, for mathematics learning. Girls, boys, and computers for mathematics learning, Annual conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria. http://www.mav.vic.edu.au/pd/confs/2003/papers/Forgasz_paper.pdf
  • Galbraith, P. (2006). Students, mathematics, and technology: assessing the present –challenging the future. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 37, nº 3, 277–290.
  • Galbraith, P. & Haines, C. (2000). Mathematics-computing Attitudes Scales. Monographs in Continuing Education. City University London.
  • Goldin, G.A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical thinking and learning, 2 (3), 209–219.
  • Goldin, G. A. (2007). Aspects of affect and mathematical modeling processes. In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.) Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 281–296). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  • Gómez-Chacón, I. Mª (2000). Affective influences in the knowledge of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43 (2), 149–168.
  • Gómez-Chacón, I. Mª et. al. (2001). Matemáticas en la red. Internet en el aula de Secundaria (Mathematics on-line. Internet in the classroom Secondary). Madrid: MEC- Narcea.
  • Gómez-Chacón, I. Mª and Haines, C. (2008). Students’ attitudes to mathematics and technology. Comparative study between the United Kingdom and Spain. In ICME-11, 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education.( http://www.tsg.icme11.org/tsg/show/31 ).
  • Gómez-Chacón, I. Mª (2010). Students’attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 28 (2), 227–244.
  • Goos, M.; Galbraith, P.; Renshaw, P. & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms, Journal of Mathematical behavior, 22, 73–89.
  • Guin, D. & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: the case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3 (3), 195–227.
  • Hannula, M. (2002). Attitude toward mathematics: emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 25–46.
  • Hart, L. (1989). Describing the Affective Domain: Saying What We Mean. In D. Mc Leod and V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving (pp.37–45), Springer Verlag.
  • Hernandez, R. & Gómez-Chacón, I. Mª (1997). Las actitudes en educación matemática. Estrategias para el cambio. Revista de Didáctica de las matemáticas, UNO, Monográfico Actitudes y Matemáticas, 13, 41– 61.
  • Hohenwarter, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2007). Mathematics teacher development with ICT: towards an International GeoGebra Institute. In D. Küchemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. 27(3). University of Northampton, UK: BSRLM.
  • Kulm, G. (1980). Research on Mathematics Attitude. In R.J. Shumway (Ed.), Research in mathematics education (pp. 356–387). Reston, VA, NCTM.
  • Lagrange, J. B. (2000). L’intégration des instruments informatiques dans l’enseignement: Unes approaches para les techniques. Educational Studies in mathematics, 43 (1): 1– 30.
  • Leder, G. and Forgasz, H. J. (2006). Affect and mathematics education, In A. Gutiérrez, P. Boero (Eds), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future (pp. 403–427), New York: Sense Publishers.
  • Mariotti, M. A. (2002). The influence of technological advances on students’ mathematics learning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. (pp. 695–723), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • McLeod, D. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to the present, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24, 637–647.
  • N.C.T.M. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards. Reston: NCTM.
  • Noss, R. (2002). For a learnable mathematics in the digital culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 21–46.
  • Pierce, R. and Stacey, K. (2004). A framework for monitoring progress and planning teaching towards the effective use of computer Algebra Systems. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 9, 59–93.
  • Pierce,R.,Stacey,K. and Brakatsas, A. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’attitudes to learning mathematics with technology.Computer and Education48,285–300.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. (pp. 334–389). New York: McMillan.
  • Richard, P.R., Fortuny, J.M., Hohenwarter, M., & Gagnon, M. (2007). Geogebra TUTOR: une nouvelle approche pour la recherche sur l’apprentissage compétentiel et instrumenté de la géométrie à l’école secondaire. Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare & Higher Education of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Québec, Canada.
  • Ruffell,M.,Mason,J.&Allen,B.(1998).Studying attitude to mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics 35,1–18.