NotabiliaEl comentario perdido de Juan Duns Escoto a Metafísica XII

  1. Francisco León Florido
Journal:
Helmantica: Revista de filología clásica y hebrea

ISSN: 0018-0114

Year of publication: 2020

Tome: 71

Issue: 205

Pages: 77-109

Type: Article

More publications in: Helmantica: Revista de filología clásica y hebrea

Abstract

John Duns Scotus is the author of a series of commentaries on Aristotle’s works. The critic has determined that many of them are false attributions, and should be attributed to other authors (John Dymsdale, Gonzalo Hispano, Antonio Andrés). The discovery of the Notabilia super Metaphysicam has come to complete the philosophical corpus of treatises of Scotus, and it is the only place where we find his authentic commentary on Book XII of Aristotle’s Metaphysics

Bibliographic References

  • Andrews, R.: “The ‘notabilia scoti in libros topicorum’: An Assessment of Authenticity”, Franciscan Studies, vol. 56, Essays in Honor of Dr. Girard Etzkorn (1998), pp. 65-75.
  • Berube, C.: “Antoine André: Témoin et Interprète de Scot”, Antonianum 54 (1979), pp. 386-446.
  • Boehner, Ph.: “The hypothetical first redaction of Ockham’s ‘expositio aurea’”, Franciscan Studies, vol. 14, n. 4 (1954), pp. 374-386.
  • Borgo, M.: “Latin medieval translations of Aristotle’s Metaphysics”, Gabriele Galluzzo, Fabrizio Amerini (eds.), A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2014, pp. 19-57.
  • Cambell, J.: “La Section scotiste”, II Collegio San Bonaventura di Quaracchi, Grottaferrata, 1977, pp. 253-286.
  • Christensen, M. S.: “John Dinsdale on Intellectual Self-knowledge: An edition of the prooemium and questions I.1 and III.15 of John Dinsdale’s Quaestiones in De anima”, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge grec et latin, vol. 86, 2017, pp. 79-131.
  • Courtenay, W. J.: “Early Scotists at Paris: A Reconsideration”, Franciscan Studies, Vol. 69 (2011), pp. 209-220.
  • Cross, R.: “Duns Scotus: Some Recent Research”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 49, n. 3, julio 2011, pp. 271-295.
  • Antonie Vos, “Two critical text revolutions”, The Philosophy of John Duns Scotus, Edinburgh,E. University Press, 2006, pp. 103-147.
  • Dumont, D.: “The Question on Individuation in Scotus’ Quaestiones super Metaphysicam “, Via Scoti. Atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale, Roma 9-11 marzo 1993, Roma, ed. L.Sileo, 1995, I, pp. 193-227.
  • Ermatinger, C.: “John of Tytynsale (d. ca. 1289) as the Pseudo-Scotus of the Questions on Metaphysics X and XII”, Manuscripta 23 (1979), 7-8.
  • Gensler, M.: “Antonius Andreae Scotism’s best supporting auctor”, Anuari de la Societat Catalana de Filosofia, 1996, pp. 57-79.
  • Glorieux, P. : La Faculté des Arts et ses maîtres au XIIIe siècle, París, Vrin, 1971, pp. 38-46.
  • Longpré, E.: “Les Conclusions métaphysiques de Gonzalve de Balboa”, La France franciscaine, 5 (1922).
  • Maier, A.: “Handschriftliches zu Wilhelm Ockham und Walter Burley”, Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, 48 (1955), pp. 211-216, 225-251, 470-474.
  • Pasnau R.(ed.): Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 7, Briefly noted, pp. 257-8.
  • Pini, G.: “Duns Scotus’ Commentary on the ‘Topics’: New Light on his philosophical Teaching”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age, vol. 66 (1999), pp. 225-243.
  • Pini, G. “Duns Scotus’s Metaphysics: The Critical Edition of his ‘Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis’”, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, vol. 65, n. 2, 1998, pp. 353-368.
  • Pini, G. “Notabilia Scoti super Metaphysicam: una testimonianza ritrovata dell’insegnamento di Scoto sulla Metafisica,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, 89 (1996), pp. 137-180.
  • Pini, G. “Scotistic Aristotelianism: Antonius Andreas’ Expositio and Quaestiones on the Metaphysics”, Via Scoti: Methodologica ad mentem Ioannis Duns Scoti. Atti del Congresso scotistico internazionale Roma, Pontificio ateneo Antonianum, 9-11 marzo 1993, Roma, ed. Antonianum, 1995, pp. 375-399.
  • Pini, G. “Scotus’ Questions on the Metaphysics: A Vindication of Pure Intellect”, Fabrizio Amerini – Gabriele Galluzzo (eds.), op. cit., pp. 359-384.
  • Pini, G. “Sulla fortuna delle Quaestiones super Metaphysicam di Duns Scoto: le Quaestiones super Metaphysicam di Antonio Andrea”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 6 (1995), pp 281-361.
  • Pini, G. “Una lettura scotista della Metafisica di Aristotele: L’Expositio in libros Metaphysicorum di Antonio Andrea”, Roma, Antonianum, 54 (1991), pp. 529-586.
  • Sbaralea, J. H.: “Opus fortasse alicuius ex Scoti discipulis”, Supplementum et castigatio ad Scriptores trium Ordinum S. Francisci II 67, 1923, reimp. Nabu Press, 2012.
  • Seeberg, R.: Die Theologie des Johannes Duns Scotus, (Studien Zur Geschichte Der Theologie Und Der Kirche, Band 5), Gebundene Ausgabe, reimp. Amsterdam, Scientia Verlag, 1971, p. 61.
  • Suto, T.: “Johannes de Dinsdale, Quaestiones super Decimum Librum Ethicorum. An Edition”, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge grec et latin, vol. 88, 2019, pp. 56-134.
  • Thro, L., Ermatinger, C.: “Questions on Aristotle, Metaphysics X and XII, by Master John Dymsdale”, Manuscripta 36 (1992), pp. 71-124; 37 (1993), pp. 107-67.