Securitización:agendas de investigación abiertas para el estudio de la seguridad

  1. Verdes-Montenegro Escánez, Francisco J.
Journal:
Relaciones internacionales

ISSN: 1699-3950

Year of publication: 2015

Issue Title: La alteridad en las Relaciones Internacionales

Issue: 29

Pages: 111-131

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Relaciones internacionales

Abstract

In little more than a decade, the securitization theory initially pushed forward by the Copenhagen School has secured a place within International Security Studies and in International Relations at large. Over the years, ontological and epistemological questions have been object of in-depth discussion in our field of study, as a consequence of which new research agendas have arisen. The paper begins by reviewing the context in which securitization theory comes to the fore, thereby paving the way for the presentation of its original framework of analysis. Bearing in mind the various critiques and revisions that have dealt with the theory, this paper proposes a research agenda organized around five key issues. The goal ultimately is to put new energy into debates around this theoretical framework, which might be of particular interest for the Spanish-speaking academic community.

Bibliographic References

  • Acharya, A. y B. Buzan, “Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, nº 7, 2007, pp. 287–312.
  • Albert, M. y B. Buzan, “Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation”, en Security dialogue, nº 42, 2011, pp. 413–425.
  • Arenal, C., Etnocentrismo y Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales: una visión crítica. Ed. Tecnos, Madrid, 2014.
  • Austin, J.L., How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, 1975.
  • Balzacq, T., “The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context”, European journal of international relations, nº11, 2005, pp. 171–201.
  • Balzacq, T., Securitization Theory. How security problems emerge and dissolve. Londres: Ed. Taylor & Francis, 2011.
  • Balzacq, T., “A theory of securitization”, en Securitization Theory, Londres: Ed. Taylor & Francis, 2011, 2011, pp. 1-30.
  • Balzacq T., “Enquiries into methods: a new framework for securitization analysis” en Securitization Theory, Londres: Ed. Taylor & Francis, 2011, pp. 31-54.
  • Balzacq T., Guzzini S., Williams M.C., y H. Patomaki, “Forum: What of theory–if any– is securitization? en International Relations, publicado en línea el 21 de octubre de 2014.
  • Bigo, D., “Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease”, en Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Febrero, nº 27, 2002, pp. 63-92.
  • Bigo, D., “Pierre Bourdieu y las Relaciones Internacionales: el poder de las prácticas, las prácticas del poder”, en Relaciones Internacionales, nº 24, 2013, pp. 33-76.
  • Bilgin, P., “The politics of studying securitization? The Copenhagen School in Turkey”, en Security Dialogue, nº 42, 2011, pp. 399–412.
  • Booth, K., Theory of world security. Cambridge: Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Buzan, B., People, states, and fear: The national security problem in international relations. Londres: Wheatsheaf Books Brighton, 1983.
  • Buzan, B., “Security after the Cold War”, en Cooperation and Conflict, n° 32 (5), 1997, pp. 5-28.
  • Buzan, B. y L. Hansen, The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  • Buzan, B. y R., Little, International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Buzan, B., Waever, O., Regions and power. The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., “Macrosecuritisation and security constellations: reconsidering scale in securitisation theory”, en Review of International Studies, nº35, 2009, pp. 253–276.
  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O. y J. De Wilde, Security: a new framework for analysis. Ed. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Londres, 1998.
  • Charrett Ch., “A critical application of Securitization Theory: overcoming the normative dilemma of writing security”, en ICIP Working Paper, Barcelona: Instituto Catalán Internacional para la Paz, nº 2009/7.
  • Ciută F., “Security and the problem of context: a hermeneutical critique of securitisation theory” enReview of International Studies, nº 35, 2009, pp. 301–326.
  • CASE Collective, “Critical approaches to security in Europe: A networked manifesto.” en Security Dialogue, nº37, 2006, pp. 443–487.
  • Coutto, T., “América del Sur y la proliferación de armas biológicas” en Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, nº 101, 2013, pp. 81-106.
  • Fawcett y Hurrell, Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • Fierke, K.M., Critical approaches to international security. Ed. Cambridge Polity, 2007.
  • Gad, U.P., Petersen, K.L., “Concepts of politics in securitization studies”, en Security Dialogue, nº42, 2011, pp. 315–328.
  • Griffiths, M, Roach, S.C. y M. S. Solomon, Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations, Ed. Routledge, New York, 2009.
  • Hansen, L., “The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School” en Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 29 no. 2, 2000, pp. 285-306
  • Hansen, L., Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: Ed. Routledge, 2006.
  • Hansen, L., “Theorizing the image for Security Studies Visual securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis”, en European Journal of International Relations, nº 17, 2011, pp. 51–74.
  • Hansen, L., “Reconstructing desecuritisation: the normative-political in the Copenhagen School and directions for how to apply it”, en Review of International Studies, nº 38, 2012, pp. 525–546.
  • Huysmans, J., “Defining Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative Dilemma of Writing Security”, en Alternatives, nº 27, 2002, pp. 41–62.
  • Leonard, S. y Ch. Kaunert, “Reconceptualizing the audience in the securitization theory”, en Balzacq, T. (ed.) Securitization Theory. How security problems emerge and dissolve. Londres: Ed. Taylor & Francis, 2011.
  • Krause K. y M. C. Williams, “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics an Methods”, en Mershon International Studies Review, n° 40, 1996, pp. 229-254.
  • McDonald, M., “Securitization and the Construction of Security”, en European Journal of International Relations, nº 14, 2008, pp. 563–587.
  • Oelsner, A., “Consensus and Governance in Mercosur: The Evolution of the South American Security Agenda”, en Security Dialogue nº 40, 2009, pp. 191–212.
  • Onuf, N., “Levels”, en European Journal of International Relations, nº1, 1995, pp. 35–58.
  • Peoples, C. y N., Vaughan-Williams, “Critical security studies: an introduction”. London: Ed. Routledge, 2010.
  • Pérez de Armiño K. e I. Mendia (coords.) Seguridad Humana. Aportes críticos al debate teórico y político. Ed. Tecnos-Hegoa, 2013.
  • Sanahuja, J.A. y J. Schünemann, “El nexo seguridad-desarrollo: entre la construcción de la paz y la securitización de la ayuda”, en Construcción de La Paz, Seguridad y Desarrollo: Visiones, Políticas y Actores. Madrid: Editorial Complutense, 2012, pp. 17–70.
  • Searle, J.R., La construcción de la realidad social, Barcelona: Ed. Paidós, 1997.
  • Strange, S., “¿Qué Teoría? La Teoría en Mad Money”, en Relaciones Internacionales, nº 21, 2012, pp. 125–144.
  • Stritzel, H. (2007) “Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and beyond”, en European Journal of International Relations, nº 13, pp. 357–383.
  • Suganami H., “The English School, History and Theory”, en Ritsumeikan International AffairsVol.9, 2011, pp.27-50.
  • Tickner, A.B. y O. Wæver, International relations scholarship around the world. London: Ed. Routledge, 2009.
  • Van der Pijl, “The Discipline of Fear. The Securitisation of International Relations Post-9/11 in Historical Perspective”, 2012. Disponible en: https://www.academia.edu/2518623/The_Discipline_of_Fear._The_Securitisation_of_International_Relations_Post-9_11_in_Historical_Perspective
  • Vuori, J.A., “Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: Applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders.” en European Journal of International Relations, nº 14, 2008, pp. 65–99.
  • Vuori, J.A. “A timely Prophet? The Doomsday Clock as a Visualization of Securutization Moves with a Global Referent Object”, en Security Dialogue, n| 41, 2010, pp. 255-277.
  • Waever, O., “Security, the Speech Act. Analysing the Politics of a Word”, Paper presented at he Research Training Seminar, Sostrup Manor, June 1989. Second draft, Jerusalem/Tel Aviv, 25-26 June 1989.
  • Wæver, O., “Politics, security, theory”, en Security Dialogue, nº 42, 2011, pp. 465–480.
  • Walt, S., “The Renassaince of Security Studies”, en International Studies Quarterly, n° 35, 1991, pp. 211-239.
  • Waltz, K.N., Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Nueva York: Ed. Columbia University Press, 2001[1953].
  • Wilkinson, C., “The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is Securitization Theory Useable Outside Europe?” en Security Dialogue nº 38, 2007, pp. 5–25.
  • Williams, M.C., “Words, images, enemies: securitization and international politics”, en International studies quarterly, nº 47, 2003, pp. 511–531.
  • Wolfers, A., “National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol”, en Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 67, nº 4, 1952, pp. 481-502.
Data source: Dialnet