Con la creatividad por las nubesdocencia y creatividad en el Cloud Class

  1. De-Marchis, Giorgio P. 1
  2. de-la-Vara-López, Javier 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Espejo de Monografías de Comunicación Social

ISSN: 2660-4213

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: CloudClass: Comunicación virtual para la innovación docente (2022, ISBN: 978-84-17600-78-5)

Número: 15

Páginas: 105-119

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.52495/C6.EMCS.15.C45 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Espejo de Monografías de Comunicación Social

Resumen

El pensamiento crítico y la creatividad son útiles para la solución de problemas. En un mundo cambiante, dichas capacidades son esenciales. Por ello, los planes educativos deben tener en cuenta el desarrollo de competencias como el pensamiento crítico y la creatividad. Uno de los cambios que se está produciendo es que la docencia se está moviendo hacia un entorno en línea (aka, online) como un espacio de encuentro cómodo, y hacia la nube (aka, cloud) como un espacio de memoria permanente. Hay que comprender cómo se pueden aprovechar las ventajas de la comunicación online y de la memoria de la nube para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la creatividad. En este capítulo revisamos las experiencias publicadas sobre docencia de creatividad online y en la nube. Se sugiere, por ejemplo, el uso de la valoración de los trabajos por parte de los compañeros o mentoría, la creación de equipos de trabajos enmarcados en situaciones cooperativas o competitivas, el uso de las analogías, o del modelo creativo de solución de problemas. Palabras clave: creatividad, docencia, en línea, online, nube, cloud class, colaboración

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arpaci, I. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of cloud computing adoption in education to achieve knowledge management. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 382-390.
  • Barak, M. (2017). Cloud pedagogy: Utilizing web-based technologies for the promotion of social constructivist learning in science teacher preparation courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(5), 459-469.
  • Barnes, A. (2019). Perseverance in mathematical reasoning: The role of children’s conative focus in the productive interplay between cognition and affect. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 271-294.
  • Belski, I., Skiadopoulos, A., Aranda-Mena, G., Cascini, G., & Russo, D. (2019). Engineering creativity: the influence of general knowledge and thinking heuristics. In Advances in Systematic Creativity (pp. 245-263). Springer.
  • Carson, D.K. (1999), Counseling, en Runco, M.A. y Pritzker, S.R. (Editores), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Academic Press.
  • Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, https://citl.illinois.edu/paradigms/design-thinking, n.d.
  • Çevik, Y.D. (2015). Assessor or assessee? Investigating the differential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students’ problem-solving skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 250-258.
  • Dwyer, C.P.; Walsh, A. (2020). An exploratory quantitative case study of critical thinking development through adult distance learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 17-35.
  • Engerman, J.A.; MacAllan, M.; Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2018). Games for boys: A qualitative study of experiences with commercial off the shelf gaming. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 313-339.
  • Gabaree, L.; Rodeghiero, C.; Presicce, C.; Rusk, N.; Jain, R. (2020). Designing creative and connected online learning experiences. Information and Learning Sciences.
  • Grabe, M.; Grabe, C. (1999). Integrating the Internet for meaningful learning. Houghton Mifflin Co.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological bulletin, 53(4), 267.
  • Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101. Springer publishing company.
  • Koh, J.H.L.; Chai, C.S.; Wong, B.; Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer.
  • Kukkonen, T.; Chang‐Kredl, S.; Bolden, B. (2020). Creative collaboration in young children’s playful group drawing. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 897-911.
  • Li, L.; Liu, X.; Steckelberg, A.L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British journal of educational technology, 41(3), 525-536.
  • Little, G.B.; Wuensch, K. (2015). Is the relationship between anxiety and creativity moderated by other emotional states. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 20(3), 143-150.
  • Mainhard, T.; Oudman, S.; Hornstra, L.; Bosker, R.J.; Goetz, T. (2018). Student emotions in class: The relative importance of teachers and their interpersonal relations with students. Learning and instruction, 53, 109-119.
  • Michinov, N.; Primois, C. (2005). Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 11-28.
  • Michinov, N.; Brunot, S.; Le Bohec, O.; Juhel, J.; Delaval, M. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56(1), 243-252.
  • Nelson, M.M.; Schunn, C.D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional science, 37(4), 375-401.
  • Nicol, D.; Thomson, A.; Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122.
  • Nussbaum Voehl, M.; Barahona Millacura, C.D.; Rodríguez Palma, M.F.; Guentulle Saavedra, V.A.; López Rojas, F.I.; Vásquez Uscanga, E.A.; Cabezas Gazaga, V. (2020). Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online.
  • Palloff, R.M.; Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Phunaploy, N.; Chatwattana, P.; Piriyasurawong, P. (2021). The Results of Development of the Online Instruction with Design-based Thinking for the Construction of Creative Products.
  • Presicce, C.; Jain, R.; Rodeghiero, C.; Gabaree, L.E.; Rusk, N. (2020). WeScratch: an inclusive, playful and collaborative approach to creative learning online. Information and Learning Sciences.
  • Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. MIT press.
  • Shimizu, D.; Yomogida, I.; Shijun, W.; Okada, T. (2021). Exploring the Potential of Art Workshop: An Attempt to Foster People’s Creativity in an Online Environment. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 8(1), 89-107.
  • Shorfuzzaman, M.; Alelaiwi, A.; Masud, M.; Hassan, M.M.; Hossain, M.S. (2015). Usability of a cloud-based collaborative learning framework to improve learners’ experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 967-976.
  • Snowball, J.D.; Mostert, M. (2013). Dancing with the devil: Formative peer assessment and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 646-659.
  • Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
  • Topping, K.J.; Smith, E.F.; Swanson, I.; Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
  • Treffinger, D.J.; Isaksen, S.G.; Stead-Dorval, K.B. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Prufrock Press Inc.
  • Tsai, C.-C.; Lin, S.S.; Yuan, S.-M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252.
  • Van der Pol, J.; Van den Berg, B.; Admiraal, W.F.; Simons, P.R.-J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1804-1817.
  • Wang, J.; Jou, M. (2016). Qualitative investigation on the views of inquiry teaching based upon the cloud learning environment of high school physics teachers from Beijing, Taipei, and Chicago. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 212-222.
  • Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Wu, C.-L.; Chen, P.-Z. (2022). Differences in online creative performance of single and paired players in cooperative and competitive task situations. Thinking skills and creativity, 44, 101037.
  • Wu, T.-T.; Wu, Y.-T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking skills and creativity, 35, 100631.
  • Wu, Y.; Schunn, C. D. (2020). When peers agree, do students listen? The central role of feedback quality and feedback frequency in determining uptake of feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101897.
  • Yang, Y.-F.; Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and instruction, 20(1), 72-83.
  • Zhang, Y.; Pi, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, J. (2021). Online peer assessment improves learners’ creativity: not only learners’ roles as an assessor or assessee, but also their behavioral sequence matter. Thinking skills and creativity, 42, 100950.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet