Changes in preference for male faces during the menstrual cycle in a Spanish population

Bibliographic References

• Alvergne, A., and Lummaa, V. (2009). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 171-179.
• Bailey, D. H., Duranteb, K. M., and Geary, D. C. (2011). Men's perception of women's attractiveness is calibrated to relative mate value and dominance of the women's partner. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 138-143.
• Bellis, M. A., and Baker, R. R. (1990). Do females promote sperm competition? Data for humans. Animal Behaviour, 40, 997-999.
• Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
• Buss, D. M., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., and Barkow, J. H. (1992). Mate preferences mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249-266). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Buss, D. M., and Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
• Conover, W. J. (1999). Nonparametric statistics (3 ed.). New York: John Willey & Sons
• Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
• DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Frederick, D. A., Haselton, M. G., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Evidence for menstrual cycle shifts in women"s preferences for masculinity: A response to Harris (in press) "Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered". Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 768-775.
• Dunbar, R. I. M., and Dunbar, P. (1974). The reproductive cycle of the gelada baboon. Animal Behaviour, 22, 203-204.
• Eisenegger, C., Naef, M., Snozzi, R., Heinrichs, M. & Fehr, E. (2010). Prejudice and truth about the effect of testosterone on human bargaining behaviour. Nature, 463, 356-359
• Esnaola, I. (2008). El autoconcepto físico durante el ciclo vital. Anales de Psicología, 24, 1-8.
• Evans, N. A. (2004). Current concepts in anabolicandrogenic steroids. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 32, 534-542.
• Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E.,. Perrett, D. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215-222.
• Fink, B., Grammer, K., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Schaefer, K., Bookstein, F. L.,. Manning, J. T. (2005). Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, 272, 1995-2001.
• Fink, B., and Penton-Voak, I. S. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 154-158.
• Folstad, I., and Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603-622.
• Freeman, S., and Herron, J. C. (2002). Análisis evolutivo (2 ed.). Madrid: Pearson Educación.
• Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Simpson, J. A., and Cousins, A. J. (2007). Changes in women"s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 151-163.
• Gangestad, S. W., and Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Tradeoffs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-644.
• Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., and Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women"s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203-207.
• Gangestad, S. W., and Thornhill, R. (2008). Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, 275, 991-1000.
• Guéguen, N. (2009a). Menstrual cycle phases and female receptivity to a courtship solicitation: An evaluation in a nightclub. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 351-355.
• Guéguen, N. (2009b). The receptivity of women to courtship solicitation across the menstrual cycle: A field experiment. Biological Psychology, 80, 321-324.
• Harris, C. R. (2011). Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered. Sex Roles, 64, 669-681.
• Havlicek, J., Roberts, S. C., and Flegr, J. (2005). Women"s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1, 256-259.
• Hönekopp, J., Rudolph, U., Beier, L., Liebert, A., and Müller, C. (2007). Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 106-111.
• Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., and Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for a hormonemediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251-267.
• Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., and Law Smith, M. J. (2008). Effects of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Face Preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 78-84.
• Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Law Smith, M. J.,. Perrett, D. I. (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283-290.
• Kawamura, K. (2011). A model of public consultation: Why is binary communication so common. The Economic Journal, 121, 819-842.
• Klingenberg, C. P., and McIntyre, G. S. (1998). Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: Analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution, 52, 1363-1375.
• Little, A. C., Cohen, D. L., Jones, B. C., and Belsky, J. (2007). Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 967-973.
• Little, A. C., and Hancock, P. J. (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgements of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 451-464.
• Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., and DeBruine, L. M. (2008). Preferences for variation in masculinity in real male faces change across the menstrual cycle. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 478-482.
• Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., and Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 1095-1100.
• Neave, N., Laing, S., Fink, B., and Manning, J. T. (2003). Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 270, 2167-2172.
• Neu, C. M., Rauch, F., Rittweger, J., Manz, F., and Schoenau, E. (2002). Influence of puberty on muscle development at the forearm. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 283, E103-E107.
• Oinonen, K., and Mazmanian, D. (2007). Facial symmetry detection ability changes across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 75, 136-145.
• Penke, L., Todd, P. M., Lenton, A. P., and Fasolo, B. (2007). How selfassessments can guide human mating decisions. In G. Geher and G. F. Miller (Eds.), Mating Intelligence: New insights into intimate relationships, human sexuality, and the mind's reproductive system (pp. 37-75). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Penton-Voak, I. S., and Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39-48.
• Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. I., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D., and Murray, L. K. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741-742.
• Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M.,. Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887.
• Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., and Rhodes, G. (2009). Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies. PloS One, 4, e4138.
• Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women"s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388-397.
• Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226.
• Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., and Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B (supplement), 70, 93-95.
• Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., and Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 186-201.
• Rowell, T. E. (1969). Intrasexual behaviour and female reproductive cycles of baboons (Papio anubis). Animal Behaviour, 17, 159-167.
• Sanchez-Pages, S., and Turiegano, E. (2010). Testosterone, facial symmetry and cooperation in the prisoners' dilemma. Physiology & Behavior, 99, 355-361.
• Scheib, J. E. (2001). Contextspecific mate choice criteria: Women's tradeoffs in the contexts of longterm and extrapair mateships. Personal Relationships, 8, 371-389.
• Thornhill, R. (2007). The evolution of womeńs estrus, extended sexuality, and concealed ovulation, and their implications for human sexuality research. In S. W. Gangestad and J. A. Simpson (Eds.), The Evolution of Mind. Fundamental Questions and Controversies. New York: Guilford Press.
• Thornhill, R., and Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 452-460.
• Vaughn, J. E., Bradley, K. I., Byrd-Craven, J., and Kennison, S. M. (2010). The effect of mortality salience on women"s judgments of male faces. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 477-491.
• Windhager, S., Shaefer, K., and Fink, B. (2011). Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 23, 805-814.