Cómo surge la innovación en colectividades de aprendizaje colaborativo en línea

  1. Simone Belli 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

ISSN: 1578-8946

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 23

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.3038 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDDD editor

Otras publicaciones en: Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

En este artículo analizamos el marco de participación en un corpus compuesto de 30 horas de sesiones en línea entre estudiantes de pregrado, sus profesores y expertos internacionales sobre innovación y emprendimiento. Presentamos una interacción multimodal de lenguaje verbal y corporal para el análisis de eventos momento a momento de interacción social en contextos de aprendizaje colaborativo en línea, enfocándonos en la manera en la que los participantes interactúan tanto con expresión verbal como no verbal. Se han podido identificar los vínculos entre participantes en procesos interactivos que siguen patrones y estructuras similares. Por ejemplo, la innovación se muestra en situaciones colaborativas y distribuidas de grupos de trabajo estructurados que fomentan dinámicas para incentivar el intercambio de conocimiento e ideas. Gracias al análisis de interacción multimodal es posible explorar procesos grupales innovadores y obtener nuevos conocimientos sobre cómo estos procesos surgen de manera colaborativa de los grupos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alves, Jorge; Marques, María José; Saur, Irina & Marques, Pedro (2007). Creativity and innovation through multidisciplinary and multisectoral cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 27-34. https://doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00417.x
  • Amabile, Teresa (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167. https://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Amabile_A_Model_of_CreativityOrg.Beh_v10_pp123-167.pdf
  • Barnes, Rebecca (2007). Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 27(3), 273-296. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.011
  • Becvar, Amaya; Hollan, James & Hutchins, Edwin (2008). Representational gestures as cognitive artifacts for developing theories in a scientific laboratory. In Mark Ackerman, Stuart Anderson, Amaya Becvar, Monica Buscher, & Paul Dourish (Eds.) Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts (pp. 117-143). Springer, London. http://hci.ucsd.edu/hollan/publications/RepresentationalGestures.pdf
  • Belli, Simone (2020). Manejo de emociones negativas en el aprendizaje colaborativo en línea. Enfoque multimodal para resolver dificultades técnicas. Pragmalinguistica, 28, 10-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.i28.01
  • Cantó-Milá, Natalia (2016). Emotions from a relational perspective. Digithum, 18, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i18.2945
  • Cooper, Robert; Edgett, Scott & Kleinschmidt, Elko (2001). Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study. r&D Management, 31(4), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00225
  • Daft, Richard & Lengel, Ricky (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. En Barry Staw & Robert Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp.191-223). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA128980.pdf
  • Duncan, Starkey (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaker turns in conversation. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 23, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033031
  • Flynn, Martin; Dooley, Laura; O'Sullivan, Donald & Cormican, Keith (2003). Idea management for organisational innovation. International Journal of innovation management, 7(04), 417-442. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000878
  • Gershenfeld, Neil (2012). How to make almost anything: The digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Aff., 91, 43. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/fora91&div=114&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
  • Goodwin, Charles (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.
  • Goodwin, Charles (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457
  • Hampden-Turner, Charles (2009). Teaching innovation and entrepreneurship: building on the Singapore experiment. Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, John (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of pragmatics, 34(10), 1427-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3
  • Heritage, John & Sefi, Sara (1992). Dilemmas of advice. En Paul Dreaw & John Heritage (Eds.) Talk at work (pp. 359-419). Cambridge University Press. https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/heritage/Site/Publications_files/DILEMMAS_OF_ADVICE.pdf
  • Hutchby, Ian (2005): Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT press.
  • Kahn, Mark (2004). Flight of the Flamingos: A Study on the Mobility of R & D Workers: a Project by the Human Sciences Research Council in Partnership with the CSIR for the National Advisory Council on Innovation. HSRC Press.
  • Kanter, Rosabeth (1983). The change masters. Simon & Schuster.
  • Kaye, Anthony (1992). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. TheNajaden Papers. NATO ASI Series F.
  • Koen, Kenneth (2004). The fuzzy front end for incremental, platform and breakthrough products and services. En Kenneth B. Kahn (Ed.), PDMA Handbook (pp. 81-91). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172483
  • Macdonald, Janet (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers & Education, 40(4), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9
  • Martins, Ernest & Terblanche, Fabio (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European journal of innovation management, 6(1), 64-74.
  • McConnell, David (1994). Implementing computer supported co-operative learning. Kogan Page.
  • Merino, Lucia (2017). Sobre el apego emocional a los teléfonos móviles en la vida cotidiana. Digithum, 19, 37-46. https://doi.org/107238/d.v0i19.3087
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse studies, 8(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561
  • O’Conaill, Brid; Whittaker, Steve & Wilbur, Sylvia (1993). Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 398-428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0804_4
  • OECD (2001) Innovative Networks: Co-operation in National Innovation Systems. OECD.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi (2004). Two traditions of interaction research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604322915953
  • Peräkylä, Anssi; Antaki, Charles; Vehviläinen, Susan & Leudar, Ivan (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Peräkylä, Anssi & Ruusuvuori, Juri (2006). Facial expression in an assessment. En Hubert Knoblauch (ed.) Video analysis methodology and methods: qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp-127-142). Peter Lang.
  • Rossano, Matt (2012). The essential role of ritual in the transmission and reinforcement of social norms. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027038
  • Rycroft, Robert & Kash, Don (2004). Self-organizing Innovation Networks: Implications for Globalization, Technovation, 24, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00092-0
  • Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel & Jefferson, Gail (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. En Jim Schenkein (ed.) Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7-55). Academic Press, New York.
  • Salomon, Gavriel (1993). No distribution without individual’s cognition. En Gavriel Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). Cambridge University Press.
  • Sawyer, Keith (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Sawyer, Keith & DeZutter, Stacy (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013282
  • Stivers, Tanya & Sidnell, Jack (2005). Introduction: multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 2005(156), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
  • Tiitinen, Sanni & Ruusuvuori, Johanna (2014). Using Formulations and Gaze to Encourage Parents to Talk About Their and Their Children's Health and Well-Being. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.871805
  • Van de Ven, Andrew (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  • Weiste, Elina & Peräkylä, Anssi (2013). A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.839093
  • Whittaker, Steve (1992). Towards a theory of mediated communication. Hewlett-Packard Laboratories. http://shiftleft.com/mirrors/www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/91/HPL-91-78.pdf
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet