Desarrollo de una escala de psicopatía basada en el NEO PI-Rdatos normativos, fiabilidad y validez

  1. Ana Sanz-García 1
  2. María Paz García-Vera 1
  3. Jesús Sanz 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Psicopatología Clínica Legal y Forense

ISSN: 1576-9941

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Páginas: 1-28

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicopatología Clínica Legal y Forense

Resumen

There is a growing interest in understanding psychopathy from the five-factor model (FFM) or Big Five. Meta-analyses of the empirical literature on relationships between the MCF and different measures of psychopathy, empirical relationships between the NEO PI-R and major theoretical perspectives on psychopathy, content analyses of the PCL-R, and ratings of experts on psychopathy based on the NEO PI-R consistently support that 12 facets of the NEO PI-R are associated with psychopathy. Based on these associations, in this study a psychopathy scale derived from the NEO PI-R was developed, and normative, and convergent, discriminant validity data were obtained for this scale with volunteers from the general Spanish population (n = 682). The internal consistency coefficients were good (α = 0.88-0.89). Convergent correlations with NEO-PI-R measures of antisocial personality disorder were also excellent (r = 0.88-0.96) and higher than discriminant correlations with NEO-PI-R measures of other personality disorders. Men scored higher on the psychopathy scale than women (d = 0.51), which justified the development of separate norms for men and women.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1995). DSM-IV. Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales (4.ª ed.). Masson. (Orig. 1994).
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales. DSM-5 (5.ª ed.). Editorial Médica Panamericana. (Orig. 2013).
  • Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., Blonigen, D. M., Hicks, B. M., y lacono, W. G. (2005). Estimating facets of psychopathy from normal personality traits: a step toward community epidemiological investigations. Assessment, 12(1), 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191104271223
  • Beryl, R., Chou, S., y Völlm, B. (2014). A systematic review of psychopathy in women within secure settings. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 185-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.033
  • Caballo, V. E., Guillén, J. L., Salazar, I. C., y Irurtia, M. J. (2011). Estilos y trastornos de personalidad: características psicométricas del "Cuestionario Exploratorio de Personalidad-lll" (CEPER-III). Behavioral Psychology / Psicología Conductual, 19(2), 277-302.
  • Cleckley, H. (1988). The mask of sanity: An attempt to clarify some issues about the so-called psychopathic personality (5th ed.). Emily S. Cleckley. (Orig. 1976).
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2.ª ed.). LEA.
  • Colodro, J., López-García, J. J., Mezquita, L., Colodro-Conde, L., Ibáñez, M. I., Edo, S., Villa, E., y Ortet, G. (2018). Five-factor model of personality disorders: Spanish normative data and validation. Anales de Psicología, 34(2), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.2.289271
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., y McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO FFI). Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., y McCrae, R. R. (1999). Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI R). Inventario NEO reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO FFI). Manual. TEA Ediciones.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., y McCrae, R. R. (2005). A five-factor model perspective on personality disorders. En S. Strack (Ed.), Handbook of personology and psychopathology (pp. 257-270). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., y McCrae, R. R. (2009). The Five-Factor Model and the NEO Inventories. En J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 299-322). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195366877.013.0016
  • Crego, C., y Widiger, T. A. (2018). Antisocial-psychopathic personality disorder. En M. M. Martel (Ed.), Developmental pathways to disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders (pp. 91- 118). Academic Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811323-3.00004-3
  • Decuyper, M., De Pauw, S., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., y De Clercq, B. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of psychopathy-, antisocial PD- and FFM associations. European Journal of Personality, 23(7), 531-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.729
  • Derefinko, K., y Lynam, D. R. (2013). Psychopathy from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. En T. A. Widiger y P. T. Costa, Jr. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 103-117). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13939-007
  • García, L. F., Cuevas, L., Lucas, I., y Aluja, A. (2021). Comparing the prediction of dimensional personality disorders (PID-5) after three personality trait models: Five factor, Zuckerman, and Cloninger models. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3), 167-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000601
  • Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Guilford.
  • Hare, R. D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 99-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00353.x
  • Hare, R. D. (2003a). Sin conciencia. El inquietante mundo de los psicópatas que nos rodean. Paidós. (Orig., 1993).
  • Hare, R. D. (2003b). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Technical manual (2.ª ed). Multi-Health Systems.
  • Hernández, A., Ponsoda, V., Muñiz, J., Prieto, G., y Elosua, P. (2016). Revisión del modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37(3), 192-197.
  • John, O. P. (2021). History, measurement, and conceptual elaboration of the Big‑Five trait taxonomy: The paradigm matures. En O. P. John y R. W. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 35-82). The Guilford Press.
  • Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., y Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
  • Lilienfeld, S. O., y Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • López Penadés, R. (2010). Déficit en el sistema motivacional aversivo en psicópatas subclínicos evaluados mediante el Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) (Tesis doctoral, Universitat Jaume I). http://hdl.handle.net/10803/384630
  • Lynam, D. R., y Miller, J. D. (2015). Psychopathy from a basic trait perspective: The utility of a five‐ factor model approach. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12132
  • Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., y Derefinko, K. J. (2018). Psychopathy and personality: An articulation of the benefits of a trait-based approach. En C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2.ª ed., pp. 259-280). The Guilford Press.
  • Lynam, D. R., y Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
  • McCrae, R. R. (2020). The five-factor model of personality: Consensus and controversy. En P. J. Corr y G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (2.ª ed., pp. 129– 141). Cambridge University Press. https://doiorg.bucm.idm.oclc.org/10.1017/9781108264822.013
  • McCrae, R. R., y Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood. A five factor theory perspective (2.ª ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Miller, J. D., Bagby, R. M., Pilkonis, P. A., Reynolds, S. K., y Lynam, D. R. (2005). A simplified technique for scoring DSM-IV personality disorders with the Five-Factor Model. Assessment, 12(4), 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105280987
  • Miller, J. D., y Lynam, D. R. (2008). Dependent personality disorder: Comparing an expert generated and empirically derived five-factor model personality disorder count. Assessment, 15(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107306095
  • Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Rolland, J.-P., De Fruyt, F., Reynolds, S. K., Pham-Scottez, A., Baker, S. R., y Bagby, R. M. (2008). Scoring the DSM-IV personality disorders using the Five-Factor Model: Development and validation of normative scores for North American, French, and Dutch-Flemish samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(5), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2008.22.5.433
  • Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., y Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the Five-Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69(2), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 6494.00144
  • Millon, T., Simonsen, E., y Birket-Smith, M. (1998). Historical conceptions of psychopathy in the United States and Europe. En T. Millon, E. Simonsen, M. Birket-Smith y R. D. Davis (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior (pp. 3-31). The Guilford Press.
  • O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., y White, C. D. (2015). A meta‐analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five‐factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126
  • O’Connor, B. P. (2017). Robustness. En T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 151-171). Oxford University Press.
  • Patrick, C. J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition (manual no publicado). Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. Recuperado de http://www.phenxtoolkit.org
  • Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., y Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 913-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492
  • Poy, R., Segarra, P., Esteller, À., López, R., y Moltó, J. (2014). FFM description of the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy in men and women. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034642
  • Samuel, D. B., y Widiger, T. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(3), 286-308. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.18.3.286.35446
  • Samuel, D. B., y Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the fivefactor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(8), 1326-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
  • Sanz, J. (2007). Algunos problemas con la utilización de la adaptación española del Inventario Clínico Multiaxial de Millon-II (MCMI-II) con fines diagnósticos. Clínica y Salud, 18(3), 287-304. https://journals.copmadrid.org/clysa/archivos/107029.pdf
  • Sanz, J. (2018). La evaluación de la personalidad mediante los inventarios NEO. En J. L. Graña Gómez, M. E. de la Peña Fernández y J. M. Andreu Rodríguez (Eds.), Manual docente de psicología clínica legal y forense (3.ª ed., vol. 1, pp. 1-74). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Sanz, J., y García-Vera, M. P. (2009). Nuevos baremos para la adaptación española del Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R): fiabilidad y datos normativos en voluntarios de la población general. Clínica y Salud, 20(2), 131-144. https://journals.copmadrid.org/clysa/archivos/cl2009v20n2a3.pdf
  • Sanz, J., Gil, F., García-Vera, M. P., y Barrasa, Á. (2008). Needs and cognition/behavior patterns at work and the big five: an assessment of the Personality and Preference Inventory-Normative (PAPI-N) from the perspective of the five-factor model. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(1), 46-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00408.x
  • Sanz, J., Silva, F., y Avia, M.D. (1999). La evaluación de la personalidad desde el modelo de los “Cinco Grandes”: el Inventario de Cinco Factores NEO de Costa y McCrae. En F. Silva (Ed.), Avances en evaluación psicológica (pp. 171 234). Promolibro
  • Sanz-García, A., Gesteira, C., Sanz, J., y García-Vera, M. P. (2021). Prevalence of psychopathy in the general adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661044
  • Sanz-García, A., García-Vera, M. P., y Sanz, J. (2023). Datos normativos, fiabilidad y validez de las escalas de trastornos de la personalidad del NEO PI-R. Manuscrito bajo revisión editorial.
  • Watson, D., y Clark, L. A. (2020). Personality traits as an organizing framework for personality pathology. Personality and Mental Health, 14(1), 51-75. https://doiorg.bucm.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/pmh.1458
  • Widiger, T. A., y Costa, P. T., Jr. (Eds.). (2013). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3.ª ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13939-000
  • Widiger, T. A., Gore, W. L., Crego, C., Rojas, S. L., y Oltmanns, J. R. (2017). Five factor model and personality disorder. En T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 449-478). Oxford University Press.
  • Widiger, T. A., y Lynam, D. R. (1998). Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality. En T. Millon, E. Simonsen, M. Birket-Smith y R. D. Davis (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior (pp. 171-187). The Guilford Press.
  • Widiger, T. A., Trull, T. J., Clarkin, J. F., Sanderson, C., y Costa, P. T., Jr. (2002). A description of the DSM-IV personality disorders with the Five-Factor Model of personality. En P. T. Costa Jr. y T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (2.ª ed., pp. 89-99). American Psychological Association.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet