Escenas de saludo en los diálogos de Platón

  1. Rodrigo Verano 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Aldizkaria:
Veleia: Revista de prehistoria, historia antigua, arqueología y filología clásicas

ISSN: 0213-2095

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakien izenburua: Etnografías históricas de la comunicación en las lenguas del Mediterráneo antiguo

Zenbakia: 40

Orrialdeak: 67-83

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1387/VELEIA.23311 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Veleia: Revista de prehistoria, historia antigua, arqueología y filología clásicas

Laburpena

This paper explores the greeting scenes represented in Plato’s dialogues,from an interdisciplinary anthropological and literary approach. it analyses greeting scenesas communicative routines featuring and stylizing the universal characteristics of suchpractices. the analysis shows that greeting scenes in Plato consist of five parts, and that nonverbal elements (proxemic, perceptual and gestural) carry the most weight in the literaryshaping of the scene. this explains why they occur more frequently in narrative dialoguesthan in dramatic ones.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Berger, Ł., 2016, «Escenas de bienvenida en las comedias de Plauto», Scripta Classica 13, 65-84.
  • Berger, Ł., 2017, «Bendecir para saludar en Plauto. Redistribución de la función pragmática», Emerita 85(2), 261–287.
  • Berger, Ł., 2020, «Greeting in Roman comedy: register and (im)politeness», Journal of Latin Linguistics 19(2), 145-178.
  • Brown, P., & S. C. Levinson, 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Burnet, J., 1900-1907, Platonis Opera, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cairns, D. L., 2005, Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds, Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.
  • Culpeper, J., & D. Z. Kádár, 2010, Historical (Im)politeness, Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Davies, G., 1985, «The Significance of the Handshake Motif in Classical Funerary Art», American Journal of Archaeology 89 (4), 627-640.
  • Dennis, P. A., & W. Aycock, 1989, Literature and Anthropology, Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
  • Dickey, E., 1996, Greek Forms of Address from Herodotus to Lucian, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Duranti, A., 1997a: Linguistic Anthropology, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duranti, A., 1997b, «Universal and Culture-Specific Properties of Greetings», Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7.1, 68–69.
  • Duranti, A., 2004, A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Emde Boas, E. van, 2017, «Analyzing Agamemnon: Conversation Analysis and Particles in Greek Tragic Dialogue», Classical Philology 112, 414-434.
  • Emde Boas, E. van, en prensa, «(Im)politeness and Conversation Analysis in Greek Tragedy: The Case of Theseus and the Herald in Euripides’ Supplices», en L. Unceta Gomez, Ł. Berger (eds.), (Im)politeness in Greek and Roman Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Firth, R., 1972, «Verbal and Bodily Rituals of Greeting and Parting», en J. S. La Fontaine (ed.), The Interpretation of Ritual: Essays in Honour of A. I. Richards, Londres: Tavistock, 1-38.
  • Goffman, E., 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Nueva York: Ney York : Doubleday Anchor Books.
  • Goffman, E., 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, Nueva York: Anchor Books.
  • Goffman, E., 1971, Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Goodwin, C., 1979, «The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation», en G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology New York: Irvington, 97–121.
  • Goodwin, C., 1981, Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers, New York: Academic Press.
  • Iurescia, F., & G. Martin, 2019, «Closing Conflicts. Conversational Strategies Across Greek and Roman Tragedies», Lingue e Linguaggi 31, 233-254.
  • Keating, E. & M. Egbert, 2004, «Conversation as a Cultural Activity», en A. Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Antrhopology, Oxford:Blackwell, 169-196.
  • Kilburn, K., 1959, Lucian VI (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge (Massachussets): Harvard University Press.
  • Laborderie, J., 1978, Le dialogue platonicien de la maturité, París: Les belles lettres.
  • Lledó, E., 1981, Platón. Diálogos I, Madrid: Gredos.
  • Mari, F., 2021, Le héros comme il faut. Codes de comportement et contextes sociaux dans l'épopée homérique, Paris: Éditions de Boccard.
  • Novákova, L., & M. Pagáčová, 2016, «Dexiosis: A Meaningful Gesture of the Classical Antiquity», ILIRIA International Review, 6 (1), 207-222.
  • Redondo, E., 2022, New Insights into Politeness and Impoliteness. Studies in Ancient Greek Literary Dialogue [Veleia 39].
  • Rijksbaron, A., 2007, Ion or: On the Iliad, Leiden/Boston: Brill.
  • Roesch, S., 2005, «L’échec des clôtures du dialogue dans les comédies de Plaute», Journal of Latin Linguistics 9 (2), 921-932.
  • Roesch, S., 2008, «Les débuts de dialogue dans la comédie et la tragédie latines», en B. Bureau, Christian Nicolas (eds.), Commencer et finir dans les littératures antiques (Colloque de Lyon, 29-30 sept. 2006), Lyon: Université Jean Moulin, 207-222.
  • Sacks, H., 1992, Lectures on Conversation, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Saville-Troike, M., 1989, The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction [2.ª ed.], Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • Shalev, D., 2021, «Not Yes and Not No: μέση ἀπόκρισις and Other Forms of Non-Polar Response in Ancient Greek Literary, Theoretical and Exegetical Sources: Part I», Hermes. Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie 149(4), 388-409.
  • Schegloff, E., 2007, Sequence Organization in Interaction, Nueva York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skinner, J. E., 2012, The Invention of Greek Ethnography: From Homer to Herodotus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Spradley, J., & G. McDonoghue, 1973, Anthropology through Literature: Cross Cultural Perspectives, Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
  • Thomas, R., 2000, Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, and the Art of Persuasion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thesleff, H., 1982, Studies in Platonic Chronology, Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
  • Verano, R., 2021, «Other-Initiated Repetition and Fictive Orality in the Dialogues of Plato», en D. Beck (ed.), Repetition, Communication, and Meaning in the Ancient World [Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World Brill Series], Leiden/Boston: Brill, 261-284.
  • Wiles, E., 2020, «Three Branches of Literary Anthropology: Sources, Styles, Subject Matter», Ethnography 21(2), 280-295.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet