Devolviendo la visibilidad a los invisiblespreguntando la orientación sexual en las encuestas de opinión pública en España

  1. Ramírez Dueñas, José María 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Estudios LGBTIQ+, Comunicación y Cultura

ISSN: 2792-3622

Année de publication: 2022

Titre de la publication: Dossier Temático: Memorias, espacios y masculinidades disidentes

Volumen: 2

Número: 1

Pages: 117-128

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/ESLG.79620 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Estudios LGBTIQ+, Comunicación y Cultura

Résumé

A relevância acadêmica da orientação sexual na pesquisa social cresceu nos últimos anos com a legitimação da sociologia da sexualidade e dos estudos queer. No entanto, os inquéritos que incluem uma pergunta sobre esta questão ainda são escassos, especialmente em Espanha, onde a sua incorporação ocorreu tardiamente. O Centro de Pesquisas Sociológicas incorporou de fato questões para descobrir a orientação sexual dos respondentes em alguns de seus barômetros a partir de 2010, e é por isso que neste artigo de pesquisa pretende explorar os diferentes métodos de questionamento (indireto, quase direto e direto ) deste órgão e oferecem o debate acadêmico e teórico sobre as vantagens ou desvantagens que acarretam. Com o auxílio de três barômetros (dos anos 2014, 2016 e 2021) pretende-se explorar algumas questões de eficácia e representatividade da questão, seus efeitos na seleção da amostra e suas consequências nas investigações que incorporam esta variável na o estudo. Por fim, argumenta-se que o estilo direto permite incorporar o maior número de sujeitos (quebrando o mito de que um grande número de indivíduos não seria visível em uma pesquisa) e oferecer uma imagem mais realista da população LGBA + espanhola.

Références bibliographiques

  • Abou-Chadi, T. y Finnigan, R. (2019). Rights for Same-Sex Couples and Public Attitudes Toward Gays and Lesbians in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 52(6), 868–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797947
  • Alvira, F. (2004). La encuesta: una perspectiva general metodológica. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Col. Cuadernos Metodológicos).
  • Azofra, M. J. (1999). Cuestionarios. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Col. Cuadernos Metodológicos).
  • Ayoub, P. y Garretson J. (2017). Getting the Message Out: Media Context and Global Changes in Attitudes Toward Homosexuality. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1055–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016666836
  • Badgett, L. y Goldberg, N. (2009). Best Practices for Asking Questions about Sexual Orientation on Surveys. Los Angeles: Williams Institute.
  • Bailey, R. W. (1999). Gay Politics, Urban Politics: Identity and Economics in the Urban Setting. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
  • Bates, N.; Steinmetz, S. y Fischer, M. (2019). Special Issue on Measuring LGBT Populations (Preface). Journal of Official Statistics, 35(4) 699-707. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0029
  • Bates, N.; García Trejo, Y. y Vines, M. (2019). Are Sexual Minorities Hard-to-Survey? Insights from the 2020 Census Barriers, Attitudes, and Motivators Study Survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 35(4) 709-729. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0030
  • Berg, N. y Lien, D. (2009). Sexual orientation and self-reported lying. Review of Economics of the Household, 7, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-008-9038-1
  • Clements, B. y Field, C. (2014). Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78 (2), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu018
  • Egan, P. (2008). Explaining the Distinctiveness of Lesbians, Gays, and Bisexuals in American Politics, SSRN Electronic Journal. Doi:10.2139/ssrn.1006223.
  • Egan, P. (2020). Identity as Dependent Variable: How Americans Shift Their Identities to Align with Their Politics, American journal of Political Science, 64(3): 664-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12496
  • Grasso, L. (2006). Encuestas: elementos para su diseño y análisis. Córdoba: Editorial Brujas.
  • Guasch, O. y Osborne, R. (2003). Sociología de la Sexualidad. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Haseldon, L. y T. Joloza. (2009). Measuring Sexual Orientation: A Guide for Researchers. Office for National Statistics, Reino Unido.
  • Hertzog, M. (1996). The Lavender Vote. Nueva York: Nueva York University Press.
  • Justo, C. (2005): Sociología de la sexualidad. Política y Sociedad, 42: 273-275.
  • Lewis, G.B. y Gossett, C.W. (2008). Changing Public Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage: The Case of California. Politics & Policy, 36: 4-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x
  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., y Martin, C. (1948). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: Saunders.
  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C. y Gebhard, P. (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: Saunders.
  • Klein, F. (1978). The Bisexual Option: A Concept of One Hundred Percent Intimacy. Nueva York: Arbor House.
  • Magni, G. (2020). Elections and the Role of LGBT Issues in the United States and Abroad. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
  • Marradi, A., Archenti, N. y Piovani, J.I. (2010). Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales. Buenos Aires: Cengage Learning.
  • Martos, M.C. (2021). El éxodo rural en Castilla y León. Analizando el fenómeno del sexilio. Universidad de Valladolid.
  • OECD (2019). Society at a Glance 2019: OECD Social Indicators, A Spotlight on LGBT People. Paris OECD: Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/soc_glance-2019-en.
  • Paternotte, D. (2018). Coming out of the political science closet: the study of LGBT politics in Europe, European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1-2), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15272520831175
  • Perrella, A.; Brown, S.; y Kay, B. (2012). Voting Behaviour among the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered Electorate. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 45(1): 89-117. doi:10.1017/S000842391100093X
  • Rayside, D. (1998). On the Fringe: Gay and Lesbians in Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Reynolds, A. (2013). Representation and Rights: The Impact of LGBT Legislators in Comparative Perspective, American Political Science Review, 107(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000051
  • Rimmerman, C.; Wald, K. & Wilcox, C. (2000). The politics of gay rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Redman, S. (2018). Effects of Same-Sex Legislation on Attitudes toward Homosexuality. Political Research Quarterly, 71(3), 628–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917753077
  • Urquizu, I. (2005): El voto oculto en España. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 13: 119-156.
  • Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2020). The European lavender vote: Sexuality, ideology and vote choice in Western Europe, European Journal of Political Research, 59(3), 517-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12366
  • Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2020). Multidimensional issue preferences of the European lavender vote. Journal of European Public Policy, 28, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1804987
  • Sell, R. (1997). Defining and Measuring Sexual Orientation: A Review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(6), 643-658.
La source de données: Dialnet