Corpus MethodsA New Horizon for the Experimental Philosophy of Language

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alexander, J., Mallon, R., Weinberg, J. M. (2010). Accentuate the Negative. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(2), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0015-2
• Baker P., Gabrielatos C., McEnery T. (2013). Discourse analysis and media studies. The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Beddor, B., Egan, A. (2018). Might do better: Flexible relativism and the QUD. Semantics and Pragmatics, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.11.7
• Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2021). An Analysis of the Centrality of Intuition Talk in the Discussion on Taste Disagreements. Filozofia Nauki, 29(2), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0008
• Bordonaba-Plou, D. (2022). Disagreement is said in many ways: An experimental philosophy of language study on taste discussions. En P. Stalmaszczyk, M. Hinton (Eds.), Philosophical approaches to language and communication, volume 2, pp. 109-130. Berlín: Peter Lang.
• Bordonaba-Plou, D., Torices, J. R. (2021). Paving the road to hell: The Spanish word menas as a case study. Daimon, 84, 47-72. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.482011
• Bordonaba-Plou, D., Jreis-Navarro, L. M. (en prensa). Light in Assessing Color Quality: An Arabic-Spanish Cross-Linguistic Study. En D. Bordonaba-Plou (Ed.), Experimental Philosophy of Language: Perspectives, Methods, and Prospects, pp. 151-170. Cham: Springer.
• Braisby, N., Franks, B., Hampton, J. (1996). Essentialism, Word Use, and Concepts. Cognition, 59, 247-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00698-2
• Caton, J. N. (2020). Using Linguistic Corpora as a Philosophical Tool. Metaphilosophy, 51(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12405.
• Cepollaro, B., Sulpizio, S., Bianchi, C. (2019). How bad is it to report a slur? An empirical investigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.012
• Cepollaro, B., Domaneschi, F., Stojanovic, I. (2021). When is it ok to call someone a jerk? An experimental investigation of expressives. Synthese, 198, 9273-9292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02633-z
• Del Pinal, G., Reuter, K. (2017). Dual character concepts in social cognition: Commitments and 285 the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognitive Science, 41(S3), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12456
• DeRose, K. (1992). Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenlogical Research, 52(4), 913-929. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107917
• Deutsch, M. (2009). Experimental Philosophy and the Theory of Reference. Mind & Language, 244, 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01370.x
• Dinges, A., Zakkou, J. (2020). A direction effect on taste predicates. Philosophers’ Imprint, 20(27), 1–22. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0020.027
• Egré, P., Cova, F. (2015). Moral Asymmetries and the Semantics of Many. Semantics and Pragmatics, 8(13), 1-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.8.13
• Häggqvist, S., Wikforss, A. (2015). Experimental Semantics: The Case of Natural Kind Terms. En J. Haukioja (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Language, pp. 109-138. London: Bloomsbury.
• Hansen, N. (2014). Contemporary Ordinary Language Philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 9(8), 556-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12152
• Hansen, N. (2015). Experimental Philosophy of Language. Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hansen, N., Chemla, E. (2015). Linguistic Experiments and Ordinary Language Philosophy. Ratio, 28(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12112
• Hansen, N., Chemla, E. (2017). Color Adjectives, Standards, and Thresholds: An Experimental Investigation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40(3), 239-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9202-7
• Hansen, N., Porter, J.D., Francis, K. (2021). A corpus study of “know”: On the verification of philosophers’ frequency claims about language. Episteme, 18(2), 242-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.15
• Hensel, W. M. (2020). Double trouble? The communication dimension of the reproducibility crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10(44). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00317-6
• Hunston S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Jakubícek, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovár, V., Rychlý, P., Suchomel, V. (2013). The TenTen Corpus Family. En 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL, pp. 125-127.
• Kauppinen, A. (2007). The rise and fall of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action, 10(2), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790701305871
• Khoo, J. (2015). Modal disagreements. Inquiry, 5(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1033005
• Kilgarriff, A., Renau, I. (2013). esTenTen, a Vast Web Corpus of Peninsular and American Spanish. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.617
• Kneer, M. (2021). Predicates of personal taste: Empirical data. Synthese, 199, 6455-6471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03077-9
• Knobe, J. (2007). Experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 2(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00050.x
• Knobe, J., Nichols, S. (2008). An experimental philosophy manifesto. En J. Knobe, S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy, pp. 3-14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Knobe, J., Nichols, S. (2017). Experimental Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
• Knobe, J., Prasada, S., Newman, G. E. (2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognition, 127, 242-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005
• Knobe, J., Yalcin, S. (2014). Epistemic Modals and Context: Experimental Data. Semantics and Pragmatics, 7(10), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.10
• Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
• Liao, S.-Y., Meskin, A., Knobe, J. (2020). Dual character art concepts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 101(1), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12301
• Liao, S.-Y., Hansen, N. (2022). “Extremely racist” and “incredibly sexist”: An empirical 802 response to the charge of conceptual inflation. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2021.46
• Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style. Cognition, 92, B1-B12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
• Mallon, R., Machery, E., Nichols, S., Stich, S. P. (2009). Against Arguments from Reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(2), 332-356. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40380469
• MacFarlane, J. (2011). Epistemic Modals Are Assessment-Sensitive. En A. Egan, B. Weatherson (Eds.), Epistemic Modality, pp. 144-178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• MacFarlane, J. (2014). Assessment-Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Marques, T. (2015). Retractions. Synthese, 195(8), 3335-3359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0852-8
• Martí, G. (2009). Against Semantic Multi-Culturalism. Analysis, 69(1), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ann007
• McCledon, M. J., O’Brien, D. J. (1988). Question-Order Effects in the Determinants of Subjective Well-Being. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1086/269112
• McEnery, T., Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• McEnery, T., Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• McEnery, T., McGlashan, M., Love, R. (2015). Press and Social Media Reaction to Ideollogically Inspired Murder: The Case of Lee Rigby. Discourse and Communication, 9(2), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314568545
• Nadelhoffer, T., Nahmias, E. (2007). The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790701305921
• Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The Geography of Thought. How Asiasn and Westeners Think Differently … and Why. New York: The Free Press.
• Nisbett, R. E., Choi, I. (2001). Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic versus Analytic Cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
• Parodi, G. (2008). Lingüística de Corpus: Una Introducción al Ámbito. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 46(1), 93-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832008000100006
• Panzeri, F., Carrus, S. (2016). Slurs and negation. Phenomenology and Mind, 11, 170-180.
• Pearson, J. (1998). Terms in Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Rosenbaum, P. J., Valsiner, J. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309352913
• Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Mai, H. (1991). Assimilation and Contrast effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational Logic Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1086/269239
• Strickland, B., Suben, A. (2013). Experimenter Philosophy: The Problem of Experimenter Bias in Experimental Philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0100-9
• Stubbs, M. (1993). British Traditions in Text Analysis. From Firth to Sinclair. En M. Baker, G. Francis, E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, pp. 1-36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Sytsma, J., Livengood, J. (2011). A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(2), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048401003639832
• Sytsma, J., Bluhm, R., Willemsen, P., Reuter, K. (2019). Causation attributions and corpus analysis. En E. Fischer, & M. Curtis (Eds.), Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy, pp. 209-238. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Teubert, W. (2004). Language and Corpus Linguistics. En M. A. K. Halliday, W. Teubert, C. Yallop, A. Čermáková (Eds.), Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics, pp. 73-112. London/New York: Continuum.
• Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Ulatowski, J., Weijers, D., Sytsma, J. (2020). Cognitive science of philosophy symposium: Corpus analysis. The Brains Blog. https://philosophyofbrains.com/2020/12/15/cognitive-science- 823 of-philosophy-symposium-corpus-analysis.aspx
• Ziólkowski, A. (2021). The context-sensitivity of color adjectives and folk intuitions. Filozofia Nauki, 29(2), 157-188. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0013