Aproximación cuantitativa al lenguaje de la interpretación ambiental en un espacio protegido

  1. Marta Hidalgo
  2. María Muñoz 1
  3. José Manuel de Miguel 2
  1. 1 Fundación Fernando González Bernáldez, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  2. 2 Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Journal:
Ecosistemas: Revista científica y técnica de ecología y medio ambiente

ISSN: 1697-2473

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: Homenaje a Fernando González Bernáldez

Volume: 32

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7818/ECOS.2457 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ecosistemas: Revista científica y técnica de ecología y medio ambiente

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relative importance of three groups of linguistic terms (phenosystemic, cryptosystemic and others) used in the texts and audios of four visitor centers in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park. The first two groups match the two ecosystem components implied in the landscape concept proposed by professor Fernando González Bernáldez. The work is based on the conviction that environmental interpretation - not personalised - often gives a distorted picture of how nature works. This is largely due to the language used, which often reports almost exclusively on perceptible, conspicuous and socially emblematic components, ignoring the web of imperceptible processes and phenomena (physical, biological and cultural) that, nevertheless, constitute the essence of ecosystem functioning and that support the values that society wishes to preserve. The results of the study support the aforementioned hypothesis, highlighting the disproportionate importance of phenosystemic terms (easily perceptible) versus cryptosystemic terms (imperceptible by the senses), transmitting a simple and incomplete idea of Nature, focused on the structural components and ignoring the web of functional relationships. This circumstance may be conditioning people's evaluation of their environment, as well as environmental management approaches and decisions. We propose a change in interpretative programmesthat incorporates a more balanced, systemic and integrating language, more coherent with the complexity of ecosystem functioning.