El gobierno de la pandemia: La interrelación entre biología, sociedad y cultura

  1. Juan Carlos Revilla 1
  2. Eduardo Crespo 1
  3. Simone Belli 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

ISSN: 1578-8946

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 23

Número: 2

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.3370 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDDD editor

Otras publicaciones en: Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

Resumen

Este texto desarrolla la tesis de la interrelación entre sociedad y mundo natural, como marco de comprensión de la pandemia de la COVID-19. Esta interrelación depende de las características de actantes no humanos y humanos. Los análisis desarrollados inciden sobre aquellas características del virus que han incidido en mayor medida sobre la vida social. Se destacan aquellos rasgos de nuestra sociedad que se relacionan más directamente con la pandemia: globalizada, desigual, reflexiva y de riesgo, organizada e individualizada, y mediática. Se muestra cómo la pandemia ha sido gobernada de distintas maneras a lo largo del tiempo, en lo que podemos denominar gobierno adaptativo. Las conclusiones inciden sobre la importancia de análisis complejos sobre la interrelación entre actantes humanos y no humanos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, Vincanne & Nading, Alex (2020). Medical Anthropology in the Time of COVID-19. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 34(4), 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12624
  • Agamben, Giorgio (2020). La invención de una epidemia. En Pablo Amadeo (Ed.), Sopa de Wuhan. Pensamiento contemporáneo en tiempos de pandemia (pp. 17-20). ASPO.
  • Bayatrizi, Zohreh; Ghorbani, Hajar & Tehrani, Reza (2021). Risk, mourning, politics: Toward a transnational critical conception of grief for COVID-19 deaths in Iran. Current Sociology Monograph, 69(4), 512-528. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00113921211007153
  • Beck, Urlich (1986). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Paidos.
  • Belli, Simone; Mugnaini, Rogerio; Baltà, Joan & Abadal, Edgar (2020). Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society? Scientometrics, 124, 2661-2685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7
  • Bergquist, Savannah; Otten, Thomas & Sarich, Nick (2020). COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 623-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.007
  • Butler, Judith (2020) La fuerza de la no violencia. Planeta.
  • Caduff, Carlo (2020). What Went Wrong: Corona and the World after the Full Stop. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 34(4), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12599
  • Calderón-Gómez, Daniel; Casas-Mas, Belén; Urraco-Solanilla, Mariano & Revilla, Juan Carlos (2020). The Labour Digital Divide: Digital Dimensions of Labour Market Segmentation. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 14(2), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.2.0007
  • Callon, Michel (1998). El proceso de construcción de la sociedad. El estudio de la tecnología como herramienta para el análisis sociológico. En Miquel Domenech y Francisco Tirado (Eds.), Sociología simétrica. Ensayos sobre ciencia, tecnología y sociedad (pp. 143-170). Gedisa.
  • Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto; Menéndez, Lumila; Laciny, Alice; Bobadilla Rodríguez, Hernan; Bravo Morante, Guillermo; Carmen, Esther; Dorninger, Christian; Fabris, Flavia; Grunstra, Nicole; Schnorr, Stephanie; Stuhlträger, Julia; Villanueva Hernández, Luis; Jakab, Manuel; Sarto-Jackson, Isabella & Caniglia, Guido (2021). Diversity lost: COVID-19 as a phenomenon of the total environment. Science of The Total Environment, 756, 144014.
  • Colombo, Enzo (2021). Human Rights-inspired Governmentality: COVID-19 through a Human Dignity Perspective. Critical Sociology, 47(4-5), 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0896920520971846
  • Craig, Lyn (2020). Coronavirus, domestic labour and care: Gendered roles locked down. Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 684-692. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1440783320942413
  • Crespo, Eduardo; Revilla, Juan Carlos & Fermín, Elizaga (2014). Meteorología y sociedad: uso y evaluación de la información meteorológica. Comunicación y Sociedad, 27(2), 169-194. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.27.36000
  • Danaher, Geoff; Schirato, Tony & Webb, John (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sage.
  • Dingwall, Robert; Hoffman, Lily & Staniland, Karen (2013). Introduction: why a Sociology of Pandemics? Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12019
  • Domènech, Miquel & Tirado, Francisco (1998). Claves para la lectura de textos simétricos. En Miquel Domenech & Francisco Tirado (Eds.), Sociología simétrica. Ensayos sobre ciencia, tecnología y sociedad (pp. 13-50). Gedisa.
  • Douglas, Mary (1996). La aceptabilidad del riesgo según las ciencias sociales. Paidós.
  • Erkoreka, Anton (2009). Origins of the Spanish Influenza pandemic (1918-1920) and its relation to the First World War. Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, 3(2), 190-194. https://doi.org/10.4172%2F1747-0862.1000033
  • Faas, Alejandro; Barrios, Roberto; García-Acosta, Virginia; Garriga-López, Adriana; Mattes, Seven & Trivedi, Jennifer (2020). Entangled Roots and Otherwise Possibilities: An Anthropology of Disasters COVID-19 Research Agenda. Human Organization, 79(4), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.17730/1938-3525-79.4.333
  • Foucault, Michel (1977). Surveiller et punir. Gallimard.
  • French, Martin & Mykhalovskiy, Eric (2013). Public health intelligence and the detection of potential pandemics. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(2), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01536.x
  • Giddens, Anthony (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press.
  • Giritli Nygren, Katarine & Olofsson, Anna (2020). Managing the Covid-19 pandemic through individual responsibility: The consequences of a world risk society and enhanced ethopolitics. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8), 1031-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756382
  • Giritli Nygren, Katarine & Olofsson, Anna (2021). Swedish exceptionalism, herd immunity and the welfare state: A media analysis of struggles over the nature and legitimacy of the COVID-19 pandemic strategy in Sweden. Current Sociology, 69(4), 529-546. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011392121990025
  • Han, Ben (2020). La emergencia viral y el mundo de mañana. En Pablo Amadeo (Ed.), Sopa de Wuhan. Pensamiento contemporáneo en tiempos de pandemia (pp. 97-111). ASPO.
  • Janssen, Marijn & van der Voort, Haiko (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102180
  • Latour, Bruno (1999). La esperanza de Pandora. Ensayos sobre la realidad de los estudios de la ciencia. Gedisa.
  • Latour, Bruno (2017). Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity Press.
  • Law, John (1986). On power and its tactics: a view from the Sociology of Science. The Sociological Review, 34, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-954X.1986.tb02693.x
  • L’Estrange, Sean (2020). Testing Times: Viral surveillance and social control in post-lockdown societies. Irish Journal of Sociology, 28(3), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0791603520940941
  • Link, Bruce & Phelan, Jo (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, (Extra Issue), 80-94. https://core.ac.uk/reader/77145022?utm_source=linkout
  • López Gómez, Daniel & Tirado, Francisco (2012). Teoría del Actor-Red: Un pragmatismo contemporáneo. En Francisco J. Tirado & Daniel López Gómez (Eds.), Teoría del actor-red: Más allá de los estudios de ciencia y tecnología (pp. 1-16). Amentia.
  • Lupton, Deborah (2021). Contextualising COVID-19: Sociocultural Perspectives on Contagion. En Deborah Lupton & Karen Willis (Eds.), The COVID-19 Crisis: Social Perspectives (pp. 16-26). Routledge.
  • Lust, Jan (2021). A Class Analysis of the Expansion of COVID-19 in Peru: The Case of Metropolitan Lima. Critical Sociology, 47(4-5), 657-670. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0896920521991612
  • Mansnerus, Erika (2013). Using model-based evidence in the governance of pandemics. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(2), 280-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01540.x
  • Márquez, Humberto & Delgado Wise, Raúl (2011). Una perspectiva del sur sobre capital global, migración forzada y desarrollo alternativo. Migración y desarrollo, 9(16), 3-42. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-75992011000100001
  • Martini, Marco; Gazzaniga, Vito; Bragazzi, Nora & Barberis, Ivan (2019). The Spanish Influenza Pandemic: a lesson from history 100 years after 1918. Journal of Prevention and Medical Hygiene, 60(1), E64-E67. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1205
  • Martuccelli, Danilo (2021). La gestión anti-sociológica y tecno-experta de la pandemia del COVID-19. Papeles del CEIC, 2021/1, papel 246. https://doi.org/10.1387/pceic.21916
  • Matthewman, Steve & Huppatz, Kate (2020). A sociology of Covid-19. Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 675-683. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1440783320939416
  • Michael, Mike (1996). Constructing identities. Sage.
  • Monaghan, Lee (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19), pandemic psychology and the fractured society: a sociological case for critique, foresight and action. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(8), 1982-1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13202
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS] (2020). Pandemic fatigue. Reinvigorating the public to prevent COVID-19. Autor.
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS] (2021). Información básica sobre la COVID-19. Autor. https://www.who.int/es/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19
  • Ortega, Francisco & Orsini, Michael (2020). Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: Ignorance, neoliberal authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership. Global Public Health, 15(9), 1257-1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1795223
  • Petrova, Velislava & Russell, Colin (2018). The evolution of seasonal influenza viruses. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.118
  • Puleo, Alicia (2011). Ecofeminismo: para otro mundo posible. Cátedra.
  • Remuzzi, Andrea & Remuzzi, Giuseppe (2020). COVID-19 and Italy: what next? The Lancet, 395(10231), 1225-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9
  • Shokoohi, Mostafa; Osooli, Mehdi & Stranges, Saverio (2020). COVID-19 Pandemic: What Can the West Learn from the East? International Journal of Health Policy Management, 9(10), 436-438. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.85
  • Spinney, Laura (2017/2020). El jinete pálido. 1918: La epidemia que cambió el mundo. Ed. Crítica.
  • Taylor, Rosemary (2013). The politics of securing borders and the identities of disease. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(2), 241–254. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14679566
  • Tirado, Francisco (2011) Los objetos y el acontecimiento. Teoría de la socialidad mínima. Amentia
  • Vampa, Davide (2021). COVID-19 and Territorial Policy Dynamics in Western Europe: Comparing France, Spain, Italy, Germany, and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Federalism, 51(4), 601-626. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjab017
  • van Bavel, Jay; Baicker, Katherine; Boggio, Paulo; Capraro, Valerio; Cichocka, Aleksandra; Cikara, Mina; Crockett, Molly; Crum, Alia; Douglas, Karen; Druckman, James; Drury, John; Dube, Oeindrila; Ellemers, Naomi; Finkel, Eli; Fowler, James; Gelfand, Michele; Han, Shihui; Haslam, Alexander; Jetten Jolanda; Kitayama, Shinobu… Willer, Robb (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 460(4), 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
  • Zinn, Jens (2021a). Introduction: Towards a sociology of pandemics. Current Sociology Monograph, 69(4), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00113921211020771
  • Zinn, Jens (2021b). Conclusions: Towards a sociology of pandemics and beyond. Current Sociology Monograph, 69(4), 603-617. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00113921211023518