A Comparative View of the Right to Counsel and the Protection of Attorney-Client Communications

  1. Bachmaier Winter, Lorena
  2. Thaman, Stephen C.
Libro:
The Right to Counsel and the Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege in Criminal Proceedings

Editorial: Springer

ISSN: 2214-6881,  2214-689X

ISBN: 9783030431228,  9783030431235

Año de publicación: 2020

Páginas: 7-73

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-43123-5_2 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

This chapter aims at providing a comparative overview on the protection of the fundamental right to counsel and the lawyer-client confidentiality in criminal proceedings. It will first explore the extent of the right to access to a lawyer, at which procedural stage and in relation to what types of offences it inures and what activities it entails. Before analysing the protection of the right to counsel and its content at the national level, the principles set out by the ECtHR will be addressed, as it shows the higher degree of harmonization achieved among the European countries. The impact of the EU Directive on the Right to Access to Lawyer, crucial to understanding the gradual approximation of the laws of the EU countries in this area, will also be mentioned.The chapter will then discuss the breadth of the attorney-client privilege and the related confidentiality of attorney-client communications: the types of communications to which it applies and the extent to which it derives from the constitutional right to counsel, or only from national legislation. Following this it will be discussed how the different national legal systems protect the lawyer against confidential attorney-client material being the subject of judicial subpoena, an office search, a search of a computer or stored digital files, or any kind of interception of attorney-client communications. Finally, the consequences of the infringements of the right to counsel and the right to confidentiality of communications between lawyer and client will be analysed, going from exclusionary rules of evidence to sanctions to the lawyer breaching the duty of confidentiality. At the end, we have tried to draft certain conclusions with suggestions as to where improvements could be made in the protection of this fundamental right.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ashworth A, Zedner L (eds) (2014) Preventive justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  • Bachmaier Winter L (2004) Intervenciones telefónicas y derechos de terceros en el proceso penal. La necesidad de una regulación legal del secreto professional y de otras relaciones de confianza. Revista de Derecho Procesal 1(3):41–82
  • Bachmaier Winter L (ed) (2008) Proceso penal y sistemas acusatorios. Marcial Pons, Madrid
  • Bachmaier Winter L (2013) Spain: the constitutional court’s move from categorical exclusion to limited balancing. In: Thaman S (ed) Exclusionary rules in comparative law. Springer, New York-Heidelberg, pp 209–234
  • Bachmaier Winter L (2016) Access to telecommunication data in criminal justice: Spain. In: Sieber U, von zur Mühlen N (eds) Access to telecommunication data in criminal justice. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 647–704
  • Bachmaier Winter L (2017) Remote computer searches under the new 2015 Spanish Law: the proportionality principle and the protection of privacy. ZStW 129(1):1–27
  • Bachmaier Winter L (2018) Countering terrorism: suspects without suspicion and pre-suspects under surveillance. In: Sieber U, Mitsilegas V, Billis E, Mylonopolus C, Knust N (eds) Alternative systems of crime control. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 171–191
  • Bachmaier Winter L, Del Moral A (2020) Criminal law in Spain. Wolters Kluwer, The Netherlands
  • Cape E, Hodgson J, Prakken T, Spronken T (2007) Procedural rights at the investigative stage: towards a real commitment to minimum standards. In: Cape E, Hodgson J, Prakken T (eds) Suspects in Europe. Procedural rights at the investigative stage of the criminal process in Europe. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 1–28
  • Cras S (2014) The directive on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings. EUCRIM 2014(1):32–44
  • Epstein ES (2017) The attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine. ABA Publishing, Chicago
  • Handbook on European Law relating to access to justice, 2016, by the Council of Europe, the European Court of Human Rights and the Fundamental Rights Agency, published by the FRA 2016. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2016/handbook-european-law-relating-access-justice . Accessed 31 Oct 2019
  • Hirsch Ballin MFH (2012) Terrorism causing a shifting responsibility in criminal pre-trial investigation: from repression to prevention. In: Hirsch Ballin et al. (eds) Shifting responsibilities in criminal justice. Critical portrayals of the changing role and content of a fragmented globalizing law domain. Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, pp 9–29
  • Langbein JH (2003) The origins of adversary criminal trial. Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York
  • Mackintosh JT, Angus KM (2004) Conflict in confidentiality: how E.U. laws leave in-house counsel outside the privilege. Int Lawyer 38(1):35–54
  • Manso T (2012) Las escuchas telefónicas entre abogado defensor y cliente en una comparación internacional. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos XXXII:39–95
  • Nieto A (2013) Investigaciones internas, whistleblowing y cooperación: la lucha por la información en el proceso penal. Diario La Ley 8120:1–17
  • Ross JE (2016) The emergence of foreign intelligence investigations as alternatives to the criminal process: a view of American counterterrorism surveillance through German lenses. In: Ross JE, Thaman SC (eds) Comparative criminal procedure. Elgar, Cheltenham
  • Schumann S, Bruckmüller K, Soyer R (2012a) Assessing pre-trial access to legal advice-results of a comparative legal and empirical study. New J EU Crim Law 3(1):31–48
  • Schumann S, Bruckmüller K, Soyer R (eds) (2012b) Pre-trial emergency defence. NWV Verlag, Vienna
  • Simon R (2015) The criminal defense lawyer exception to the fourth amendment. Seton Hall Law Rev 45:347–382
  • Spronken T (2012) Effective defence. The letter of rights and the Salduz Directive. In: Vermeulen G (ed) Defence rights. International and European Developments. Intersentia, Antwerpen, pp 81–104
  • Spronken T, Vermeulen G, De Vocht V, Van Puyenbroek L (2009) EU procedural rights in criminal proceedings. Maklu, Antwerp 2009. Available at http://www.law.ugent.be/ircp/sweetlemon/sites/default/files/pdf/EU_Procedural_Rights_in_Criminal_Proceedings.pdf . Accessed 31 Oct 2019
  • Thaman SC (2000) Is America a systematic violator of human rights in the administration of criminal justice? St. Louis Univ Law J 44:999
  • Thaman SC (2001) Miranda in comparative law. St. Louis Univ Law J 45:581
  • Thaman SC (2007) The nullification of the Russian jury: lessons for jury-inspired reform in Eurasia and beyond. Cornell Int Law J 40:355–428
  • Thaman SC (2008a) Comparative criminal procedure: a casebook approach, 2nd edn. Carolina Academic Press, Durham
  • Thaman SC (2008b) The two faces of justice in the post-soviet legal sphere: adversarial procedures, jury trial, plea-bargaining and the inquisitorial legacy. In: Jackson J, Langer M, Tillers P (eds) Crime, procedure and evidence in comparative and international context: essays in honour of Mirjan Damaska. Hart, Oxford, Portland, pp 99–118
  • Thaman SC (2010) A typology of consensual criminal procedures: an historical and comparative perspective on the theory and practice of avoiding the full criminal trial. In: Thaman SC (ed) World plea bargaining: consensual procedures and the avoidance of the full criminal trial. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, pp 297–396
  • Thaman SC (2013) Balancing truth against human rights: a theory of modern exclusionary rules. In: Thaman S (ed) Exclusionary rules in comparative law. Springer, New York-Heidelberg, pp 403–446
  • Vogler R (2005) A world view of criminal justice. Ashgate, Aldershot