Los efectos de la publicidad en la elección de la universidad en Españauna propuesta metodológica basada en factores emocionales y racionales

  1. Mamani Ramos, Olinda Julia 1
  2. Pintado Blanco, Teresa 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Pensar la publicidad: revista internacional de investigaciones publicitarias

ISSN: 1887-8598,  1989-5143

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 16

Número: 1

Páginas: 25-38

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/PEPU.79616 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Pensar la publicidad: revista internacional de investigaciones publicitarias

Resumen

The increase in competition from Spanish universities in the market has been constant over the last four decades. Together with the complexity of the decision-making process, it has made students become more demanding when choosing the university. In addition, the factors that influence decision-making are external and internal such as family, teachers, school advisors, reputation, cost, location, communication, personal experiences, self-esteem and other factors that consciously or unconsciously contribute to the choice of an institution. Also, students today look for information in different media to reach a reliable decision-making, since this will affect their future work financially and personally. For this reason, universities need to be prepared to meet this need, and the role of advertising will contribute to informing and establishing that link with potential students and the university. The objective of this work is to propose a conceptual model that, through a methodological proposal, contributes to understanding how advertising based on rational and emotional factors influences the choice of the university. The contribution of this study proposal is aimed at the educational sector, specifically universities and those responsible for communication or marketing managers, in which emotional and rational advertising strategies will be proposed to guarantee the effectiveness of university advertisements.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ancheh, K. S. B. (2006). Institutional factors attracting students to Malaysian institutions of higher education. International Review of Business Research Papers, 2(1), 46-64.
  • Brown, J. A. C. (1963). Técnicas de persuasión: De la propaganda al lavado de cerebro. Alianza.
  • Cabrera, A. F. & La Nasa, S. M. (2000). Understanding the college-choice process. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000 (107), 5-22.
  • Cannizzo, F. & James, S. (2020). Existential advertising in late modernity: Meaningful work in higher education advertisements. Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 314-332.
  • Chapman, D. W. (1981). A model of student college choice. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(5), 490-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981837
  • ClarkE, G. & Brown, M. A. (1998). Consumer attitudes to the higher education application process. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8(4), 83-96.
  • Conard, M. J. & Conard, M. A. (2000). An analysis of academic reputation as perceived by consumers of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9(4), 69-80.
  • Connor, H. (2001). Deciding for or against participation in higher education: The views of young people from lower social class backgrounds. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(2), 204-224.
  • Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design : choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Dabenigno, V. (2017). La sistematización de datos cualitativos desde una perspectiva procesual. De la transcripción y los memos a las rondas de codificación y procesamiento de entrevistas. En Borda, P., Dabenigno, V., Freidin, B., & Guelman, M. (2017). Estrategias para el análisis de datos cualitativos. (Herramientas para la Investigación social nº 2, pp. 22-70). Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani.
  • Deighton, J., Henderson, C. M. & Neslin, S. A. (1994). The effects of advertising on brand switching and repeat purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1), 28-43.
  • De Sousa, R. (1990). The rationality of emotion. Mit Press.
  • Diel, S. & Katsinas, S. (2018). University advertising and universality in messaging. Innovative Higher Education, 43(3), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9421-7
  • Eisend, M. & Tarrahi, F. (2016). The effectiveness of advertising: A meta-meta-analysis of advertising inputs and outcomes. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1185981
  • Eisend, M., Eisend, M., Küster, F. & Küster, F. (2011). The effectiveness of publicity versus advertising: A meta-analytic investigation of its moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 906-921. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11747-010-0224-3
  • Foskett, N. (2011). Markets, government, funding and the marketization of UK higher education. En Molesworth, M., Scullion, R., & Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and student as consumer (1era ed., pp. 25-38). Taylor & Francis Ltd., Routledge.
  • Foskett, N. & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2002). Choosing futures: Young people´s decision-making in education, training and careers markets. Routledge.
  • García Alcaraz, J. L., & Moreno Morales, C. S. (2012). Factores considerados al seleccionar una universidad: Caso ciudad Juárez. Revista Mexicana De Investigación Educativa, 17(52), 287-305.
  • Harris, M. S. (2009). Message in a bottle: University advertising during bowl games. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 285- 296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9085-9
  • HartleY, M., & Morphew, C. C. (2008). What’s being sold and to what end? A content analysis of college viewbooks. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 671-691
  • Heckman, S. J., & Montalto, C. P. (2018). Consumer risk preferences and higher education enrollment decisions. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(1), 166-196.
  • Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2015). University choice: What do we know, what don’t we know and what do we still need to find out? International Journal of Educational Management,
  • Blair, M. H., & Rosenberg, K. E. (1994) Convergent findings increase our understanding of how advertising works. Journal of Advertising Research, 35-44.
  • Holbrook, M. B., & O’Shaughnessy, J. (1984). The role of emotion in advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 1(2), 45-64.
  • Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62, 201-221.
  • Hossler, D., Schmit, J., & Vesper, N. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Press. Journal of College Admission, 168, 30
  • John, E. P. S., Paulsen, M. B. & Starkey, J. B. (1996). The nexus between college choice and persistence. Research in Higher Education, 37(2), 175-220.
  • Joseph, M. & Joseph, B. (2000). Indonesian students’ perceptions of choice criteria in the selection of a tertiary institution: Strategic implications. International Journal of Educational Management,14(1), 40-44.
  • Jugenheimer, D. W. (1995). Advertising the university. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 6(1), 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1300/J050v06n01_01
  • Kim, C., Jeon, H. G. & Lee, K. C. (2020). Discovering the role of emotional and rational appeals and hidden heterogeneity of consumers in advertising copies for sustainable marketing. Sustainability, 12(12), 5189.
  • Kohn, M. G., Mansk, C. F. & Mundel, D. S. (1976). An empirical investigation of factors which influence college-going behavior. Annals of economic and social measurement, NBER 5(4), 391-419.
  • Kotler, P. (1965). Behavioral models for analyzing buyers. Journal of Marketing, 29(4), 37-45.
  • Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions. Prentice Hall.
  • Mangold, W. G. & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
  • Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management,
  • Maringe, F. & Foskett, N. (2012). Globalization and internationalization in higher education: Theoretical, strategic and management perspectives. A&C Black.
  • Maringe, F. & Gibbs, P. (2008). Marketing higher education: Theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  • Markle, G. (2015). Factors influencing persistence among nontraditional university students. Adult Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267-285.
  • Mehboob, F., Shah, S. M. & Bhutto, N. A. (2012). Factors influencing student’s enrollment decisions in selection of higher education institutions (HEI’s). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(5), 558-568.
  • Menon, M. E. (2004). Information search as an indication of rationality in student choice of higher education. Education Economics, 12(3), 267-283.
  • Menon, M. E., Saiti, A. & Socratous, M. (2007). Rationality, information search and choice in higher education: Evidence from greece. Higher Education, 54(5), 705-721.
  • Mogaji, E. & Yoon, H. (2019). Thematic analysis of marketing messages in UK universities’ prospectuses. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1561-1581.
  • Moogan, Y. J., Baron, S. & Harris, K. (1999). Decision-making behaviour of potential higher education students. Higher Education Quarterly, 53(3), 211-228.
  • Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147-149.
  • Muthaly, S., C. Lobo, A. & Song Jen-Yuan, J. (2013). Marketing of postgraduate education in taiwan: Issues for foreign universities. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(1), 118-130.
  • Navarro, G. M. & Rivera-Camino, J. (2008). La influencia de la comunicación comercial en el proceso decisional jerárquico: Una evaluación empírica en el contexto educativo. Cuadernos De Economía, 31(86), 83-116.
  • Ng, P., Lee, D., Wong, P. & Lam, R. (2020). Making a higher education institution choice: Differences in the susceptibility to online information on students’ advice-seeking behavior. Online Information Review,44(4), 847-861
  • Obermeit, K. (2012). Students’ choice of universities in germany: Structure, factors and information sources used. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(2), 206-230.
  • OtamendI, F. J. & Sutil Martín, D. L. (2020). The emotional effectiveness of advertisement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2088.
  • Papadimitriou, A., & Blanco %amírez, G. (2015). Exploring advertising in higher education: An empirical analysis in North America, Europe, and Japan. Tertiary Education and Management, 21(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.999702
  • Penalva-Verdú, C., Alaminos, A., Francés, F. & Santacreu, Ó. (2015). La investigación cualitativa: Técnicas de investigación y análisis con atlas. ti. Pydlos ediciones.
  • Perna, L. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic group differences in college enrollment decisions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(107), 65-83.
  • Price, I. F., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L. & Agahi, H. (2003). The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities, 14-27
  • Poels, K. & Dewitte, S. (2019). The role of emotions in advertising: A call to action. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 81-90.
  • Ramasubramanian, S., Gyure, J. F. & Mursi, N. M. (2003). Impact of internet images: Impression-formation effects of university web site images. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(2), 49-68.
  • Saichaie, K. & Morphew, C. C. (2014). What college and university websites reveal about the purposes of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 499-530.
  • Shah, M., Nair, C. S. & BennetT, L. (2013). Factors influencing student choice to study at private higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education,
  • Sheth, J. N. (1974). Measurement of advertising effectiveness: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Advertising, 3(1), 6-11.
  • Sidin, S. M., Hussin, S. R. & Soon, T. H. (2003). An exploratory study of factors influencing the college choice decision of undergraduate students in malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 8(3), 259-280.
  • Simões, C. & Soares, A. M. (2010). Applying to higher education: Information sources and choice factors. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 371-389.
  • Soutar, G. N. & Turner, J. P. (2002). Students’ preferences for university: A conjoint analysis. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1), 40-45.
  • Stear, C. (1977). A university measures the effects of its advertising. Journal of the National Association of College Admissions Counselors, 21(3), 7-9.
  • Tavares, O., & Cardoso, S. (2013). Enrolment choices in portuguese higher education: Do students behave as rational consumers? Higher Education, 66(3), 297-309.
  • Telli Yamamoto, G. (2006). University evaluation-selection: A turkish case. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(7), 559-569.
  • Temple, S. L. (2009). Factors that influence students’ desires to attend higher education.
  • Tucciarone, K. (2007). Vying for attention: How does advertising affect search and college choice? College and University, 83(1), 26.
  • Tucciarone, K. (2008). Advertising’s effect on community college search and choice. Community College Enterprise, 14(2), 73. https://search.proquest.com/docview/218812591
  • Vaughn, R. (1980). How advertising works: A planning model. Journal of Advertising Research, 20 (5), 27-33
  • Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A. & Melanthiou, Y. (2007). A contemporary higher education student-choice model for developed countries. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 979-989.
  • Wagner, K. & Fard, P. (2009). Factors influencing malaysian students’ intention to study at a higher educational institution. E-Leader Kuala Lumpur., 1-12
  • Yadi Yaakop, A., Mahadi, N., Zainal Ariffin, Z. & Sarah Omar, S. (2018). Review of hierarchy-of-effects (hoe) models and higher education advertising in Malaysia. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, (11), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.32861/ jssr.411.212.219
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet