Comportamiento del injerto autólogo de diente en preservación alveolarevaluación clínica, radiográfica e histomorfométrica de un caso clínico tras un año de seguimiento

  1. Tomás Beca Campoy
  2. Luis Sánchez-Labrador 1
  3. Elio Minetti 2
  4. Leticia Alejandra Blanco Antona 3
  5. José María Martínez-González 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Odontología
  2. 2 University of Milan
    info

    University of Milan

    Milán, Italia

    ROR https://ror.org/00wjc7c48

  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
Científica dental: Revista científica de formación continuada

ISSN: 1697-6398 1697-641X

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 20

Issue: 2

Pages: 41-48

Type: Article

More publications in: Científica dental: Revista científica de formación continuada

Abstract

Introduction: following tooth extraction, horizontal and vertical resorption of bone volume occurs, but they can be reduced by many surgical procedures, such as alveolar ridge preservation, which uses different bone substitutes, being one of them autogenous tooth-graft. Clinical case: a 61-year-old woman is presented, who came to private dental clinic presenting intense pain in the area of an upper bicuspid of the first quadrant (1.5). Exodontia of the 1.5 was performed, using it as a donor tooth to obtain the biomaterial to preserve its alveolus. After 4 months re-entry was performed and an implant was placed, harvesting a bone biopsy for histomorphometric analysis. One year post-loading, good clinical and radiographic results were shown. Discussion: human bone and tooth have similarities in their chemical composition, both in their inorganic and organic components and in the amount of water. The organic content, growth factors, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and type 1 collagen stand out, give the tooth the property of osteoinduction. The use of the tooth as a substitute in alveolar preservation achieves high percentages of neoformed bone, varying between 37.55% when the whole tooth is used, to 48.40% using demineralized dentin. In addition, it is well accepted by patients, especially in certain races or cultures, and achieves a reduction in bone dimensions evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. However, it has a drawback, requiring a long preparation time, which increases if the tooth has associated restorations or root canals. Conclusions: Autologous tooth-graft has a high biocompatibility, a low rate of intraoperative complications and good patient acceptance. It requires 25 minutes for preparation, which increases if there are restorations, root canals and caries. The percentage of vital bone obtained in the present clinical case shows new bone formation of 20% 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation.