Una nueva metodología de enseñanza y aprendizaje universitarios frente al aburrimiento académico

  1. Irene Sánchez-San-José 1
  2. Daniel Enguídanos Vanderweyen 1
  3. Manuel Iglesias-Soilán 1
  4. Patricia Ariza López 1
  5. Javier Aroztegui Vélez 1
  6. Juan Fernández Sánchez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista de educación

ISSN: 0034-8082

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 401

Pages: 101-127

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2023-401-585 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de educación


Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 0 (27-01-2024)
  • Web of Science Cited by: 0 (08-01-2024)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2022)
  • Year 2022
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.4
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 1.4
  • Article influence score: 0.421
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 217/269 (Ranking edition: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2022)
  • Year 2022
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.345
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 761/1438

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2022)
  • Year 2022
  • Journal Impact: 1.540
  • Field: EDUCACIÓN Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 17/232


  • Social Sciences: B

Scopus CiteScore

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2022)
  • Year 2022
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 1.7
  • Area: Education Percentile: 45

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2022)
  • Year 2022
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.36
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 537/759


Boredom at university has shown to interfere with teaching and learning. It is linked to variables such as task importance and complexity, or student’s autonomy, which are in turn related to the chosen teaching and learning methodology. The goal of this study is to test the effectiveness of a new methodology based on four principles -shared teaching, flipped classroom, human model of teaching and creative evaluation- on reducing boredom. Three studies were carried out during two academic years -2019/2020 and 2020/2021-, the latter consisting of a replica aimed to test if initial data can be maintained. Method: Participants were third year psychology students from the Complutense University of Madrid from 4 groups of the afternoon shift (49 participated in the initial study, 56 in the main study and 73 in the replica), who expressed their views using two ad hoc designed evaluation instruments. Participants in the last two studies attended a total of 45 hours of the same course using the proposed methodology. Results: Results show that students overall get bored in class with a notable reduction when the new methodology was used in both academic years. Conclusions: The replicated methodology fulfills its purpose. Nevertheless, more applications are convenient, enabling the study of the weight of each specific related variable in order to guarantee its correct application in other contexts.

Bibliographic References

  • Acee, T. W., Kim, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, J. I., Chu, H. N. R., Kim, M., Cho, Y., Wicker, F. W., & Boredom Research Group. (2010). Academic boredom in under-and over-challenging situations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/csm7zm
  • Arco-Tirado, J. L., Fernández-Martín, F. D., & Hervás-Torres, M. (2020). Evidence-based peer-tutoring program to improve students’ performance at the university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2190-2202. https://doi.org/gfzc9z
  • Argos, J., Ezquerra, P., Osoro, J. M., Salvador, L., & Castro, A. (2015). La evaluación de los aprendizajes de los estudiantes en el marco del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES): sus prácticas, preferencias y evolución. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 3(3), 181-194. https://doi.org/hk57
  • Armstrong, T. (2010). Neurodiversity: Discovering the extraordinary gifts of autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other brain differences. Da Capo Lifelong.
  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Bolaños Cartujo, I., El-Seyoufi Cortés, S., Marqués Delgado, F., Casado Martínez, M. D. P., Escorial Martín, S., & Gómez Ruiz, M. S. (2018). Proyecto de Auxiliares Docentes Pregraduados. Proyecto Nº 38 INNOVA-DOCENCIA 2017 UCM. https://cutt.ly/4StnvoU
  • Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., Hou, H., & Oades, L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051-1095. https://doi.org/gntx4p
  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27. https://doi.org/gf4pdg
  • Chin, A., Markey, A., Bhargava, S., Kassam, K. S., & Loewenstein, G. (2017). Bored in the USA: Experience sampling and boredom in everyday life. Emotion, 17(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/f9zrjt
  • Ching, G. (2018). A literature review on the student evaluation of teaching: An examination of the search, experience, and credence qualities of SET. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 12(2), 63-84. https://doi.org/hk59
  • Craven, A., & Frick, L. (2022). Boredom as a basis for fostering creativity in higher education: A call for pedagogical bravery. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-13. https://doi.org/jm7b
  • Daschmann, E. C., Goetz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/dnvf67
  • Daschmann, E. C., Goetz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2014). Exploring the antecedents of boredom: Do teachers know why students are bored? Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 22-30.
  • Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482-495. https://doi.org/f399ds
  • Fernández, J., Ariza, P., Enguídanos, D., Iglesias-Soilán, M., Aroztegui, J., & Sánchez-San-José, I. (2021). Nueva metodología docente dinámica frente al aburrimiento en las clases: una réplica. Proyecto Nº338 INNOVA-DOCENCIA 2020 UCM. https://cutt.ly/TStmdPu
  • Feuerstein, R., & Jensen, M. R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: Theoretical basis, goals, and instruments. The Educational Forum, 44(4), 401-423.
  • Feuerstein, R., Klein, P. S., & Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). Mediated Learning Experience (MLE): Theoretical, psychosocial and learning implications. Freund.
  • Gatica-Saavedra, M., & Rubí-González, P. (2021). La clase magistral en el contexto del modelo educativo basado en competencias. Revista Electrónica Educare, 25(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/hk6d
  • Goetz, T., Hall, N. C., & Krannich, M. (2019). Boredom. In K. A. Renninger y S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 465–489). Cambridge University Press.
  • Iglesias-Soilán, M. (2020). La enseñanza universitaria: el aburrimiento en las aulas. PUBLICACIONES, 50(3), 93-124. https://doi.org/hk6f
  • Jiménez-Hernández, D., González-Ortiz, J. J., & Tornel-Abellán, M. (2020). Metodologías activas en la universidad y su relación con los enfoques de enseñanza. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 24(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/hk6g
  • Johanns, B., Dinkens, A., & Moore, J. (2017). A systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: Evaluating effects on development of critical thinking skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 27, 89-94. https://doi.org/gcm7kg
  • Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/gdj7s9
  • Lamont, M. (209). How professors think. Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Harvard University Press.
  • Lockspeiser, T. M., O’Sullivan, P., Teherani, A., & Muller, J. (2008). Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 361-372. https://doi.org/fjf746
  • Lukas, J. F., & Santiago, K. (2009). Evaluación educativa (2ª ed.). Alianza.
  • Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Creativity is more than novelty: Reconsidering replication as a creativity act. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304-316. https://doi.org/gmm29j
  • Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537-542. https://doi.org/f4fdbt
  • Mann, S., & Robinson, A. (2009). Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/b67dcr
  • Micari, M., & Calkins, S. (2021). Is it OK to ask? The impact of instructor openness to questions on student help-seeking and academic outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 143-157.
  • Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Daniels, L. M. (2010). What to do when feeling bored?: Students' strategies for coping with boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 626-638.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-548. https://doi.org/fqjktn
  • Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88(5), 1653-1670. https://doi.org/gbw6vg
  • Pérez García, E.M., Bolaños Cartujo, J.I., Barrón López De Roda, A., Casado Martínez, M. P., Iglesias-Soilán, M., Martín Dobón, E., Enguídanos, D., Escorial Martín, S., Fernández González, S., Gómez Ruiz, M.S., Ondé Pérez, D., Orio Ortiz, L., & Río Grande, D. P., (2020). Programas de Auxiliares Docentes Posgraduados. Proyecto Nº 269 INNOVADOCENCIA 2020 UCM. https://cutt.ly/HStYrXw
  • Rees, E. L., Quinn, P. J., Davies, B., & Fotheringham, V. (2016). How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 829-837. https://doi.org/gkscf7
  • Rodríguez-Gómez, G., Ibarra-Saiz, M., Gallego-Noche, B., Gómez-Ruiz, M., & Quesada-Serra, V. (2012). La voz del estudiante en la evaluación del aprendizaje: un camino por recorrer en la universidad. RELIEVE, Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 18(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/c897
  • Rodríguez-Izquierdo, R. M. (2014). Modelo formativo en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior: valoraciones de los estudiantes. Aula Abierta, 42(2), 106-113. https://doi.org/f2sr92
  • Sánchez-Rosas, J. (2019). Aburrimiento: función, causas y estrategias de intervención. In S. Vernucci y E. Zamora (Eds.), La ciencia de enseñar. Aportes desde la psicología cognitiva a la educación (pp. 21-30). Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
  • Shao, K., Pekrun, R., Marsh, H. W., & Loderer, K. (2020). Control-value appraisals, achievement emotions, and foreign language performance: A latent interaction analysis. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101356. https://doi.org/fmpq
  • Sharp, J. G., Hemmings, B., Kay, R., Murphy, B., & Elliott, S. (2016). Academic boredom among students in higher education: A mixedmethods exploration of characteristics, contributors and consequences. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(5), 657-677. https://doi. org/gktjdd
  • Sharp, J. G., Sharp, J. C., & Young, E. (2020). Academic boredom, engagement and the achievement of undergraduate students at university: A review and synthesis of relevant literature. Research Papers in Education, 35(2), 144-184. https://doi.org/ggpt8v
  • Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 79-103. https://doi.org/fbbf
  • Stigmar, M. (2016). Peer-to-peer teaching in higher education: A critical literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 124-136. https://doi.org/f3r389
  • Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). Student satisfaction with courses and instructors in a flipped classroom: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 295-314. https://doi. org/hk6p
  • Topping, K. (2015). Peer tutoring: Old method, new developments. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 38(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/hk6q
  • Tze, V.M.C., Daniels, L.M., & Klassen, R.M (2016). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A metaanalysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28 (1), 119–144. https://doi. org/gdvp59
  • Tze, V. M., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2014). Patterns of boredom and its relationship with perceived autonomy support and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 175-187. https://doi. org/gft3dh
  • Van-Tilburg, W. A., & Igou, E. R. (2016). Boredom begs to differ: Differentiation from other negative emotions. Emotion, 17(2), 309- 332. https://doi.org/f9w6fj
  • Varela, O. E., Cater III, J. J., & Michel, N. (2015). Learner-instructor similarity: A social attribution approach to learning. Journal of Management Development, 34(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/hk6r
  • Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Fiorella, L., Carper, T., & Schatz, S. (2012). The definition, assessment, and mitigation of state boredom within educational settings: A comprehensive review. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 89-111. https://doi.org/d5tfqk
  • Westgate, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2018). Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Psychological Review, 125(5), 689-713. https://doi.org/gffhgc