Arte de escribir y necesidad logográficauna filosofía de la in-tradición

  1. Esmeralda Balaguer García 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Ápeiron: estudios de filosofía

ISSN: 2386-5326

Année de publication: 2023

Titre de la publication: Antonio Lastra. Diálogos de ciencia jovial

Número: 19

Pages: 203-217

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Ápeiron: estudios de filosofía

Résumé

What is the relationship between writing and philosophy? Does philosophy have a literary genre? Content and form are philosophically meaningful when we read a text. The fact that philosophy is inseparable from its written form puts us in the position of presupposing that what is written responds to the laws of logographic necessity. What we say and how we say what we call philosophy leads us to the path of in-tradition, because what we say is limited by the rule. All philosophy is an attempt to start again from the beginning and this presupposes an impossibility of continuity with tradition

Références bibliographiques

  • Lastra, Antonio, ‘Leer. Emerson, Leo Strauss, Harold Bloom’, Literatura y lingüística, 19 (2008).
  • Lastra, Antonio, La necesidad logográfica, Aduana Vieja, Valencia, 2014.
  • Lastra, Antonio, ‘Lo que no he dicho en La necesidad logográfica’, Ápeiron. Estudios de filosofía, (octubre 2014).
  • Ortega y Gasset, José, Obras Completas, Taurus / Fundación José Ortega y Gasset, Madrid, 2004-2012.
  • Strauss, Leo Persecution and the art of writing, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 1988.
  • Thoreau, Henry David, Walden, trad. de Javier Alcoriza y Antonio Lastra, Cátedra, Madrid, 2013.
La source de données: Dialnet