Populist strategies on Twitteranalysis of the political discourse during the campaign for the general elections in Spain on November 10th, 2019

  1. Natalia Abuín-Vences 1
  2. Daniel-Francisco García-Rosales 2
  1. 1 Univ. Complutense de Madrid
  2. 2 Universidad Camilo José Cela
    info

    Universidad Camilo José Cela

    Villanueva de la Cañada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03f6h9044

Revista:
Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

ISSN: 2386-7876

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 36

Número: 4

Páginas: 175-190

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15581/003.36.4.175-190 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

Resumen

In recent years we have witnessed a resurgence of populism, which has relied on the virality of social networks to deepen its roots in society and spread its ideas. This paper analyses the populist strategies used by all parties to viralise their messages in the online environment, regardless of ideology. The present research has also examined the possible existence of complementary strategies used by the parties’ organisational profiles and those of their leaders. To this end, a content analysis has been carried out regarding the publications made on Twitter during the 2019 election campaign. The posts have been delimited to those made by the parties and candidates that attained the highest percentage of representation in the Congress of Deputies, which include the PSOE, PP, Vox, and Unidas Podemos. The findings show that all the parties under study resorted to this type of strategy. The parties closest to centre of the political spectrum, both right and left, used mostly a populist strategy aimed predominantly at attacking their adversaries, while Vox and Unidas Podemos articulated their discourse beyond this argument, with Vox appealing to the emotions of the nation and Podemos positioning itself as the peoples’ advocate. Furthermore, a complementary strategy used by both the parties and their leaders has been identified, which fosters the expansion of these kinds of populist ideas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alonso-Muñoz, L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018a). Communication of European populist leaders on Twitter: Agenda setting and the 'more is less' effect. El Profesional de la Información, 27(6), 1193-1202. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.03
  • Alonso-Muñoz, L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018b). Political agenda on Twitter during the 2016 Spanish elections: Issues, strategies, and users' responses. Communication & Society, 31 (3), 725. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.31.3.7-23
  • Bartlett, J. (2014). Populism, social media and democratic strain. In C. Sandelind (Ed.), European populism and winning the immigration debate (pp. 99-116). Stockholm: Fores. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/104297/1/Korr%20igen.pdf
  • Berti, C. & Loner, E. (2020). The 2019 European elections on Twitter between populism, Euroscepticism and nationalism: the case of Italy. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 11(22), 275-288. https://www.doi.org/10.13128/smp-12654
  • Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357-385. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
  • Campos-Domínguez, E. & Calvo, D. (2017). La campaña electoral en internet: planificación, repercusión y viralización en Twitter durante las elecciones españolas de 2015. Comunicación y Sociedad, 29, 93-116. https://www.doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i29.6423
  • Campos-Domínguez, E. (2017). Twitter y la comunicación política. El Profesional de la Información, 26(5), 785-793. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01
  • Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
  • Capdevila, A., Moragas-Fernández, C. M. & Grau-Masot, J. M. (2022). Emergencia del populismo en España: marcos metafóricos de Vox y de su comunidad online durante las elecciones generales de 2019. El Profesional de la Información, 31(3), e310317. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.17
  • Casero-Ripollés, A., Sintes-Olivella, M. & Franch, P. (2017). The populist political communication style in action: Podemos's issues and functions on Twitter during the 2016 Spanish general election. American behavioral scientist, 61(9), 986-1001. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764217707624
  • Collier, R. & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Conniff, M. (1999). Populism in Latin America. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
  • Edelman (2018). Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2018-10/2018_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report_FEB.pdf
  • Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F. & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697
  • Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S. & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347-1364. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1329333
  • Gamir-Ríos, J., Pop, A.-I., López-García, G., Llorca-Abad, G. & Fenoll, V. (2022). Unidireccionalidad, promoción partidista y polarización. Actividad en Twitter de los candidatos a la presidencia del Gobierno de España en las elecciones generales de 2019. El Profesional de la Información, 31(2), e310203. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.03
  • García-Ortega, C. & Zugasti-Azagra, R. (2018). Gestión de la campaña de las elecciones generales de 2016 en las cuentas de Twitter de los candidatos: entre la autorre-ferencialidad y la hibridación mediática. El Profesional de la Información, 27(6), 1215-1224. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.05
  • Germani, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. New Brunswick: Transaction.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Koc Michalska, K. & Römmele, A. (2020). Populism in the era of Twitter: how social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media & Society, 22(4), 585-594. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893978
  • González Castro, J. (2021). Comunicación y populismo 2.0 en la nueva política española: el caso de Unidas Podemos y Vox. Adresearch: Revista Internacional de Investigación en Comu¬nicación, 26(26), 76-103. https://doi.org/10.7263/adresic-026-09
  • Guerrero-Solé, F., Mas-Manchón, L. & Aira, T. (2021). El impacto de la ultraderecha en Twitter durante las elecciones españolas de 2019. Cuadernos.Info, (51), 223-245. https://www.doi.org/10.7764/cdi.51.27471
  • Hendrickson, C. & Galston, W. (2017). Why are populists winning online? Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2017/04/28/why-are-populists-winning-online-social-media-reinforces-their-anti-establishment-message/
  • Jacobs, K. & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137533906
  • Kissas, A. (2020). Performative and ideological populism: the case of charismatic leaders on Twitter. Discourse & Society, 31(3), 268-284. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0957926519889127
  • Van Kessel, S. & Castelein, R. (2016). Shifting the blame. Populist politicians' use of Twitter as a tool of opposition. Journal of contemporary European research, 12(2), 439-461. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01585.x https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v12i2.709
  • Laclau, E. (2005a). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, E. (2005b). Populism: What's in a name? In B. Aretxaga, D. Dworkin, J. Gabilondo & J. Zulaika (Eds.), Empire and Terror. Nationalism/Postnationalism in the New Millenium (pp. 103-114). Nevada: Center for Basque Studies. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.unr.edu:8080/bitstream/handle/11714/117/empire_terror-web.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#page=104
  • Lava Santos, D. (2021). El discurso populista de VOX en las Elecciones Generales de 2019: análisis comparativo de las agendas temáticas en televisión y Twitter. Dígitos. Revista de Comunicación Digital, 7, 37-65. https://www.doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i7.200
  • Manfredi-Sánchez, J. L., Amado-Suárez, A. & Waisbord, S. (2021). Twitter presidencial ante la covid-19: entre el populismo y la política pop. Comunicar, 29(66), 83-94. https://www.doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-07
  • Martín-Gutiérrez, S., Losada, J. C. & Benito, R. M. (2018). Recurrent patterns of user behavior in different electoral campaigns: A Twitter analysis of the Spanish general elections of 2015 and 2016. Complexity, 2018, 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2413481
  • Maurer, P. & Diehl, T. (2020). What kind of populism? Tone and targets in the Twitter discourse of French and American presidential candidates. European Journal of Commu¬nication, 35(5), 453-468. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323120909288
  • Moffitt, B. & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political studies, 62(2), 381-397. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032
  • Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the Economics of Globalization. Journal of international business policy, 1(1-2), 12-33. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4
  • Quevedo-Redondo, R., Portalés-Oliva, M. & Berrocal-Gonzalo, S. (2016). El uso de la imagen en Twitter durante la campaña electoral municipal de 2015 en España. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 85-107. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2016-1085
  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2004). Antinomies of formalism. Laclau's theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 253-267. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263519
  • Stavrakakis, Y. & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of Syriza. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119-142. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266
  • Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1-22. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/422412
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet