Ciencia y ReligiónDos Senderos en Busca de la Verdad.

  1. Nombela Cano, César 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Fe y Libertad

ISSN: 2709-3824,  2708-745X

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 1

Issue: 2

Pages: 73-89

Type: Article

DOI: 10.55614/27093824.V1I2.17 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Fe y Libertad

Abstract

Scientific inquiry and religious experience are two ways that the concrete human being, in the exercise of his autonomy, can incorporate in his vital attitude of approaching reality. Two attitudes of the free human being to configure a worldview, a reference scheme to interpret the world and their existence within it. Science is also open to the unexpected, in fact, in the scientific transition of the 20th century, the scientific vision went from showing a deterministic reality to an indeterminate world, characterized by a complexity that is difficult to grasp. The believer's attitude poses a world of experiences, based on permanent deepening, in search of the meaning of his life. The article proposes three ways to advance in the science-religion dialogue: (i) delve into what the search for scientific truth and openness to transcendence have in common, (ii) incorporate the proposals of believers in a society cosmovisively neutral, through the cooperative translation of religious content (Habermas), and (iii) articulate a dialogue seeking any hint of truth and good that we can find within our society.

Bibliographic References

  • Arana, J. (2002). Materia, universo, vida. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Arsuaga, J. L. (2001). El enigma de la esfinge: Las causas, el curso y el propósito de la evolución. Barcelona: Plaza y Jané Editores.
  • Bersanelli, M., Gargantini, M., Corona, J., y Nombela, C. (2011). Sólo el asombro conoce: La aventura de la investigación científica. Madrid: Encuentro, S.A.
  • Brenner, S. (2003). Humanity as the model system. Science, 302 (5645), 533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.302.5645.533
  • Dawkins, R. (2007). El espejismo de Dios. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
  • Dawkins, R. (2015). El relojero ciego. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.
  • Djerassi, C. (2002). Technology and human reproduction: 1950-2050 (319). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00351-0
  • Fernández-Rañada, A. (1995). Los muchos rostros de la ciencia. Oviedo: Ediciones Nobel.
  • Fernández-Rañada, A. (2008). Los científicos y Dios. Madrid: Trotta.
  • Gomá Lanzón, J. (2013). Necesario pero imposible. Madrid: Penguin Ran-dom House Grupo Editorial España.
  • González de Cardedal, O. (s/f). Comunicación personal.
  • Habermas, J. (2012). El futuro de la naturaleza humana: ¿Hacia una eu-genesia liberal? Barcelona; Buenos Aires, México: Editorial Paidós.
  • Haught, J. F. (2008). God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens. Westminster: John Knox Press.
  • Monod, J. (2016). El Azar y la necesidad. Ensayo sobre la filosofía natural de vida moderna. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.
  • Ratzinger, J. (2001). Introducción al cristianismo. Salamanca: Sígueme.
  • Rolston, H. (2003). Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. Recuperado de https://bioethic-sarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/human_dignity/index.html
  • Vattimo, G. (2010). Adiós a la verdad. Barcelona: GEDISA.
  • Weinberg, S. (2003). Plantar cara: la ciencia y sus adversarios culturales. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.
  • Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: la unidad del conocimiento. Galaxia Gutenberg.
Data source: Dialnet