Aclaraciones sobre unos pasajes problemáticos de la obra de Longino Acerca de lo sublime (8.1; 9.9; 17.2; 27.3; 35.2; 36.2; 40.3; 44.1; 44.3)

  1. Papoulias, Haris 1
  1. 1 Universidad IE
    info

    Universidad IE

    Segovia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02jjdwm75

Journal:
Cuadernos de filología clásica: Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos

ISSN: 1131-9070

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 32

Pages: 317-336

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/CFCG.75790 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de filología clásica: Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos

Abstract

The aim of this article is to offer new proposals regarding the comprehension, the translation and interpretation, of some problematic passages in Dionysius Longinus’ text Περὶ ὕψους (On the Sublime) that have not been adequately solved so far. Some solutions, already proposed by scholars but until now without a unanimous acceptance, will be taken under exam in order to suggest alternative and original solutions, both for a better reading of the Greek text and for its translation and understanding. The underlying theoretical premise is that an interdisciplinary cooperation is needed for a better approach to the ancient text, especially between philologists and philosophers, as long as both disciplines, today often separated in the academic circles, in ancient times were fundamental elements of the Greek παιδεία.

Bibliographic References

  • Aristotelis de generatione animalium, ed. de H.J. Drossaart Lulofs, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972.
  • Aristotelis ethica Nicomachea, ed. de I. Bywater, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962.
  • Alsina Clota, J. (1996), Anónimo, Sobre lo sublime. Aristóteles, Poética, Barcelona, Bosch.
  • Aristóteles (1984), Constitución de los Atenienses. Pseudo-Aristóteles, Económicos, introd., trad. y notas de M. García Valdés, Madrid, Gredos.
  • Bréhier, E. (1908), Les idées philosophiques et religieuses de Philon d'Alexandrie, Paris, Picard.
  • Burkert, W. (20112), Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche, Stuttgart, Kohlhammer.
  • Davis, G. (2011), «Axones and Kurbeis: a new answer to an old problem», Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 60: 1-35.
  • Degani, E. (1961), AIΩN da Omero ad Aristotele, Padova, CEDAM.
  • Demóstenes (1966), Demosthenis orationes, vol. 1, ed. de S.H. Butcher, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1903 (repr. 1966).
  • Demóstenes (1980), Discursos Políticos, vol. I., trad. de A. López Eire, Madrid, Gredos.
  • Diodori bibliotheca historica, 5 vols., ed. de K.T. Fischer (post I. Bekker & L. Dindorf) y F. Vogel, Leipzig, Teubner, 1964.
  • Diophanti Alexandrini opera omnia, vol. 1, ed. de P. Tannery, Leipzig, Teubner, 1893.
  • Epictetus, Encheiridion ed. de G.J. Boter, Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana (BT). Berlin, De Gruyter, 2007.
  • García López, J. (1996), Demetrio. Sobre el Estilo. ‘Longino’ Sobre lo Sublime, Madrid, Gredos.
  • Gigante, M. (1983), «Il testo dell’Anonimo del Sublime, XL 3», en Il Sublime. Contributi per la storia di un’idea. Studi in onore di Giuseppe Martano, ed. por G. Casertano, Napoli, Morano.
  • Gojgar, M. (2017), Stilul Literar Religios, București, Editura Mica Valahie.
  • Hesíodo, Teogonía, en: Hesiod. Theogony, ed. de M. L. West, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1966.
  • Isocrate, Discours, vol. 2, ed. de É. Brémond y G. Mathieu, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1967.
  • Jaeger, W. (1982), Alabanza de la ley, trad. de Truyol y Serra, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
  • Kopidákês, M. Z. (1990), Διονυσίου Λογγίνου, Περὶ Ὕψους, Ηράκλειον, Βικαιλαία Δημοτική Βιβλιοθήκη.
  • Kroll, W. (ed.), (1973), Vettii Valentis anthologiarum libri, Berlin, Weidmann, 19081.
  • Laroche, E. (1949), Histoire de la racine nem- en grec ancien, Paris.
  • Latte, K. (ed.), (1953), Hesychii Alexandrini lexicon, vols. 1, Copenhagen, Munksgaard.
  • Lebègue, H. (19391), Du Sublime, Paris, Belles Lettres, 2003.
  • Lombardo, G. (20072), Pseudo Longino, Il Sublime, Palermo, Aesthetica.
  • Mazzucchi, C. M. (20102), Dionisio Longino, Del Sublime, Milano, Vita & Pensiero.
  • Meumann (2012), «Der Zeitgeist vor dem Zeitgeist», Frühe Neue Zeiten. Zeitwissen zwischen Reformation und Revolution, A. Landwehr (ed.), Berlin, De Gruyter.
  • Moussy, C. (1999), «Les dénominations de la figure de style chez Cicéron», en Mélanges A. Michel, Helmantica, 50.
  • Ostwald, M. (1969), Nomos and the Beginnings of the Athenian Democracy, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Philodemus, On Methods of Inference, ed. de Ph. H. De Lacy y E.A. De Lacy, Nápoles, Bibliopolis, 1978.
  • Philo Judaeus, De sacrificiis Abelis et Caini, en: Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunt, vol. 1, L. Cohn (ed.), Berlin, De Gruyter, 1962.
  • Philo Judaeus, De migratione Abrahami, en: Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunt, vol. 2, ed. por P. Wendland, Berlín, De Gruyter, 1962.
  • Philo Judaeus, Quis rerum divinarum heres sit, en: Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunt, vol. 3, ed. por P. Wendland, Berlin, De Gruyter, 1962.
  • Platonis opera, vol. 2, 3 y 5, ed. de J. Burnet, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1967.
  • Pohlenz, M. (1953), «Nomos und Physis», Hermes 81: 418-438.
  • Preisendanz, K. & Henrichs, A. (eds.) (1974), Papyri Graecae Magicae. Die Griechischen Zauberpapyri. Stuttgart, Teubner.
  • Rabe, H. (1896), Anonymi et Stephani in artem rhetoricam commentaria, en Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 21.2, Berlin, Reimer, 1896.
  • Rostagni, A. (1947), Anonimo, Del Sublime, Milano, Istituto Editoriale Italiano.
  • Russell, D.A. (1964), ‘Longinus’. On the Sublime, Oxford, University Press.
  • Saint Girons, B. (1993), Fiat Lux. Une philosophie du sublime, Paris, Quai Voltaire.
  • Schönberger, O. von, (19881), Longinus, Vom Erhabenen, Stuttgart, Reclam, 2008.
Data source: Dialnet