Are We Spending Our Scarce R&D Resources Adequately? Analyzing the Efficiency of EU’s Regional Innovation Systems

Referencias bibliográficas

• Archibugi, D. (1992). Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: A review. Science and Public Policy, 19, 357–368.
• Badiola-Sánchez, A., & Coto-Millán, P. (2012). Determinants of technical efficiency and technological innovation of European regions in the period 2002–2006. Journal of Business Management and Applied Economics, 5.
• Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
• Banker, R., & Chang, H. (2006). The Super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 175, 1311–1320.
• Bhat, R., Verma, B. B., & Reuben, E. (2001). Hospital efficiency and data envelopment analysis. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management.
• Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA. SFA and R: Springer.
• Bosco, M. G., Brugnoli, A. (2011). Regional efficiency, innovation and productivity. In Cached, RSA conference proceedings, Pécs.
• Broekel, T. (2008). From average to the frontier: A nonparametric frontier approach to the analysis of externalities and regional innovation performance. In Papers in evolutionary economic geography (pp. 04). Utrecht University.
• Broekel, T., & Meder, A. (2008). The bright and dark side of cooperation for regional innovation performance. In Jena economic research papers (pp. 053). Jena, Germany.
• Buesa, M., Martínez Pellitero, M., Baumert, T., & Heijs, J. (2007). Novel applications of existing econometric instruments to analyse regional innovation systems: The Spanish case. In J. Suriñach, R. Moreno & E. Vayá, Knowledge externalities, innovation clusters and regional development (pp. 155–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Buesa, M., Heijs, J., & Baumert, T. (2010). The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach. Research Policy, 39(6), 722–735.
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
• Chen, C. P., Hu, J. L., & Yang, C. H. (2011). An international comparison of R&D efficiency of multiple innovative outputs: The role of the national innovation system innovation: Management. Policy and Practice, 13(3), 341–360.
• Chen, K., & Guan, J. (2012). Measuring the efficiency of China’s regional innovation system: Application of network data envelopment analysis (DEA). Regional Studies, 46(3), 355–377.
• Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273–292.
• European Commission. (2001). Recherche et développement: statistiques annuelles. Luxembourg.
• Eurostat. (2011). Eurostat yearbook 2011, Europe in figures. Belgium.
• Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of efficiency productive. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(III), 253–66.
• Fritsch, M. (2004). Cooperation and the efficiency of regional R&D activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 829–846.
• Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2007). How does agglomeration affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems?. Kiel: Workshop Agglomeration and growth in knowledge based societies.
• Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2010). How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems? The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1), 87–108.
• Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. & Black. (1999). Análisis multivariante de datos’. Madrid.
• Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), 1322–1349.
• Kaihua, C., & Minting, K. (2014). Staged efficiency and its determinants of regional innovation systems: A two-step analytical procedure. The Annals of Regional Science, 52(2), 627–657.
• Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation (pp. 33–97). New York: Jhon Wiley and Sons Inc.
• Li, X. (2009). China’s regional innovation capacity in transition: An empirical approach. Research Policy, 38(2), 338–357.
• Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science, 32(2), 173–181.
• Niosi, Jorge. (2002). National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31(2), 291–302.
• Niu, D., Wang, R., Zhang, X., & Song, W. (2013). Comparative studies on efficiency of China’s regional innovation system on the basis of cooperation measurement model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 4(2), 147–157.
• Pavitt, K. (1985). Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems. Scientometrics, 7(1-2), 77–99.
• Quah, D. T. (1993). Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37, 426–434.
• Quah, D. T. (1996). Empirics for economics growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40, 1353–1375.
• Rondé, P. & Hussler, C. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does it really matter? Research Policy, 34(8), 1150–72.
• Santín, D. (2009). La Medición de la Eficiencia en el Sector Público. Técnicas Cuantitativas. http://www.sefin.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/apresentacoes/gerados/apresentacoes_madri/UD_EFICIENCIA_DANIEL_SANTIN.pdf .
• Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity and output patented inventions. The American Economic Review, 55(5), 1097–1125.
• Schmoch, U. 1999. Eignen sich Patente als Innovationsindikatoren?. In: Patentschutz und Innovation in Geschichte und Gegenwart. In Frankfurt am Main et al: R. Boch.
• Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker-Humboldt.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Nueva York: Harper & Brothers.
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (2002). Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 115–132.
• Simar, L. (2003). Detecting outliers in frontier models: A simple approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 391–424.
• Smith, K. (2005). Measuring innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery & R. Nelson (Eds), The oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 148–77). New York: Oxford.
• Suárez, C. & de Jorge, J. (2008). Efficiency convergence processes and effects of regulation in the nonspecialized retail sector in Spain. The Annals of Reg Science.
• Terrell, G. R., & Scott, W. (1992). Variable kernel density estimation. Annals of Statistics, 20(3), 1236–1265.
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits All? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219.
• Tortosa-Ausina, E., Perez, F., Mas, T., & Goerlich, F. J. (2005). Growth and covergence profile in the Spanish provinces 1965–1997. J Reg Sci, 45(1), 147–182.
• Trajtenberg, M. (1990). Patents as indicators of Innovation.In Economic Analysis of Product Innovation? MA: Cambridge.
• Walter, G., & Blum, J. (1979). Probability density estimation using delta sequences. Annals of Statistics, 7(2), 328–340.
• Wang, N., & Hagedoorn, J. (forthcoming—2014 online). The lag structure of the relationship between patenting and internal R&D revisited. Research Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.010 .
• Winkler, W. E. (2014). Matching and record linkage. WIREs Computational Statistics, 6(5), 313–325.