El papel de la robótica en Educación Infantilrevisión sistemática para el desarrollo de habilidades

  1. Zorrilla-Puerto, Jennifer 1
  2. Lores-Gómez, Beatriz 2
  3. Martínez-Requejo, Sonia 3
  4. Ruiz-Lázaro, Judit 3
  1. 1 Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Tarragona)
  2. 2 Universitat Jaume I
    info

    Universitat Jaume I

    Castelló de la Plana, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02ws1xc11

  3. 3 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

ISSN: 2529-9638

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakia: 15

Orrialdeak: 188-194

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.6018/RIITE.586601 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Robotics is increasingly becoming an indispensable resource in everyday life, and continued use is expected in the coming years. In this context, it is necessary to address how to integrate the use of robots in education from the earliest stages of development. To this end, a systematic review of the literature was carried out using the PRISMA-P protocol to analyse the different areas and educational content related to robotics in early childhood education (2013-2022). The areas and contents used for teaching robotics, the technologies used, the challenges and obstacles that arise in this context, as well as the impact of this integration in early childhood education were evaluated. The results show the most frequent incorporation in areas of cognitive and language development, although experiences are defined for motor and socio-emotional development. Regarding the educational content worked on, STEAM content such as computational thinking stands out in comparison with others such as spatial notions, dance, recycling, self-identity, or self-regulation, as well as its relationship with the content found in the infant curriculum, proving its interdisciplinary nature in the classroom, in addition to the positive impact on the students. The research highlights the use of robots such as the KIBO robotics kit, LEGO, CHERP software and Beet-Bot. In conclusion, robotics allows to address areas such as literacy, emotions, physical education, among others, relating the contents with music, culture, play, programming, etc. demonstrating its adaptability in early childhood education classrooms and the positive influence on the teaching-learning processes of infants, allowing the learning of STEM concepts and in turn areas and educational content established by legislation.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Bers, M.U., Flannery, L. Kazakoff, E. R. & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education,72, 145-157. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
  • Bizarro, N., Luengo, R. & Carvalho, J.L. (17- 19 de octubre 2018). Development of Basic Spatial Notions Through Work with Educational Robotics in the Early Childhood Education Classroom and Analysis of Qualitative Data with WebQDA Software [Comunicación en congreso]. 3erd World Conference on Qualitative Research, Lisbon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01406-3_3
  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Caballero, Y.A. & García-Valcárcel, A. (2018). A robotics-based approach to foster programming skills and computational thinking: Pilot experience in the classroom of early childhood education. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'18), New York. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1145/3284179.3284188
  • Canbeldek, M. & Isikoglu, N. (2022). Exploring the effects of “productive children: coding and robotics education program” in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 3359–3379. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s10639-022-11315-x
  • Castro, A.N. Aguilera, C.A. & Chávez, D. (2022). Robótica educativa como herramienta para la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las matemáticas en la formación universitaria de profesores de educación básica en tiempos de COVID-19. Formación universitaria, 15(2), 151-162. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062022000200151
  • Cavedini, P., Bertagnolli, S., Peres, A., Severo, O., Locatelli, E.L. & Nunes, S.V. (23-24 de septiembre 2021). Educational Robotics and Physical Education: body and movement in learning laterality in Early Childhood Education [Comunicación a congreso]. International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), Málaga. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE53363.2021.9583641
  • Dewey, J. (1938). The philosophy of the arts. John Dewey: The Later Works, 13, 357-368.
  • Di Lieto, M. C. Inguaggiato, E., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell’Omo, M., Laschi, C., Pecini, C., Santerini, G., Sgandurra, G. & Dario, P. (2017). Educational Robotics intervention on Executive Functions in preschool children: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 16-23. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.018
  • Di Lieto, M.C., Castro, E., Pecini, C., Inguaggiato, E., Cecchi, F., Dario, P., Cioni, G. & Sgandurra, G. (2020). Improving Executive Functions at School in Children with Special Needs by Educational Robotics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02813
  • Fernández, M. I. Martínez-Figueira, M.E. & Sampedro Garrido, N. (2021). El uso de la robótica educativa en la enseñanza de la lectoescritura: Posibilidades y desafíos. Comunicações Piracicaba, 28(3), 95-105. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.15600/2238-121X/comunicacoes.v28n3p95-105
  • Gamito, R., Hermoso, L., León, I., & Bilbao, L. (2021). Aprendizaje-Servicio para acercar la robótica educativa a las personas con parálisis cerebral y promover las competencias docentes. EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (78), 114-130. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.78.2213
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
  • García-Valcárcel, A. & Caballero-González, Y-A. (2019). Robótica para desarrollar el pensamiento computacional en Educación Infantil. Comunicar, (59), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-06
  • González-González, C., Violant, V., Infante, A., Cáceres, L. & Guzmán, M.D. (2021). Robótica educativa en contextos inclusivos: el caso de las aulas hospitalarias. Educación XX1, 24(1), 375-403. http://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.27047
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
  • Hidalgo Rueda, L. & Pérez-Marín, D. (21-23 de noviembre 2019). RoDy: Teaching to share in Pre-School Education with a robotic teddy [Comunicación a congreso]. International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), Tomar, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE48397.2019.8970121
  • Isnaini, R., Budiyanto, C. & Widiastuti, I. (26-28 de julio 2019). Robotics-based learning to support computational thinking skills in early childhood [Comunicación a Congreso]. 2nd International Conference on science, mathematics, environment, and education, Surakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139776
  • Jung, S. y Won, E. (2018). Systematic Review of Research Trends in Robotics Education for Young Children. Sustainability, 10(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905
  • Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36-40.
  • Kazakoff, E.R. Sullivan, A. & Bers, M.U. (2013). The Effect of a Classroom-Based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 245-255. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
  • Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers and Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
  • Marques Flores, J. & Ryokiti Homa, A. I. (2022). Educación STEM y Robótica educativa como propuesta de enseñanza y aprendizaje en primaria. UNIÓN – Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, 18(66), 1-15. https://bit.ly/3JdYDKx
  • Méndez-Porras, A., Alfaro-Velasco, J. & Rojas-Guzmán, R. (2021). Videojuegos educativos para niñas y niños en educación preescolar utilizando robótica y realidad aumentada. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informaçao, 42, 482-496. https://bit.ly/45xQD00
  • Ministerio de educación y formación profesional. Portal del sistema educativo español. https://educagob.educacionyfp.gob.es/ca/curriculo/curriculo-lomloe/menu-curriculos-basicos/ed-infantil/9
  • Misses, M.A. (2022). La robótica ludoeducativa como una disciplina multidisciplinaria. Revista Lengua y Cultura, 4(7), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.29057/lc.v4i7.9691
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. & PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Mollie, E., Sullivan, A. & Bers Umaschi, M. (2016). Programming with the KIBO Robotics Kit in Preschool Classrooms. Revista interdisciplinaria de práctica, teoría e investigación aplicada. 33(3), 169-186. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1080/07380569.2016.1216251
  • Nam, K. W., Kim, H.J. & Lee, S. (2019). Connecting Plans to Action: The Effects of a Card-Coded Robotics Curriculum and Activities on Korean Kindergartners. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(5), 387–397. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s40299-019-00438-4
  • Page, M.P., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E. Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P. & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic review. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Attitudes towards the Use of Educational Robotics: Exploring Pre-Service and In-Service Early Childhood Teacher Profiles. Education Sciences, 11(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050204
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
  • Quiroga, L.P. (2018). La robótica: otra forma de aprender. Revista de Educación y Pensamiento, 25(25), 55-64. https://bitly.ws/32uDf
  • Real decreto 95/2022, de 1 de febrero de 2022, por el que se establece la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Infantil. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 2 de febrero de 2022. Disposición 1654 del BOE núm. 28.
  • Resnick, D. (2006). ‘What Could Be Better Than This?’Conflicting Visions of the Good Life in Traditional Education. Journal of philosophy of education, 40(3), 329-344.
  • Sánchez-Vera, M. M. (2021). La robótica, la programación y el pensamiento computacional en la educación infantil. Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje, 7(1), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.22370/ieya.2021.7.1.2343
  • Santos Miranda Pinto, M. (2019). Programación y Robótica en Educación Infantil: Estudio Multi Caso en Portugal. Prisma Social. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (25), 248-276. https://bit.ly/3B3U2WZ
  • Schina, D., Esteve-González, V & Usart, M. (2021). An overview of teacher training programs in educational robotics: characteristics, best practices and recommendations. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2831-2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10377-z
  • Serrano, J.L., Sánchez Vera, M.M. & Solano, I.M. (2021). Robótica y currículum. Monográfico ERW. Una primera mirada hacia el pensamiento computacional en el currículo educativo de Infantil y Primaria en España. HipaRob.
  • Su, J., Yang, W. & Zhong, Y. (2022) Influences of Gender and Socioeconomic Status on Children’s Use of Robotics in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Review. Early Education and Development, 34(4), 910-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2078617
  • Sullivan & Bers, M.U. (2016b). Girls, Boys, and Bots: Gender Differences in Young Children’s Performance on Robotics and Programming Tasks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 15, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.28945/3547
  • Sullivan, A. & Bers, M.U. (2013). Gender differences in kindergarteners’ robotics and programming achievement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 691-702. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s10798-012-9210-z
  • Sullivan, A. & Bers, M.U. (2016a). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 3-20. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s10798-015-9304-5
  • Sullivan, A. & Bers, M.U. (2018b). Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 325-346. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
  • Sullivan, A. & Bers, M.U. (2019). Investigating the use of robotics to increase girls’ interest in engineering during early elementary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(5), 1033-1051. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s10798-018-9483-y
  • Sullivan, A. & Bers, U.M. (2018a). The Impact of Teacher Gender on Girls’ Performance on Programming Tasks in Early Elementary School. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 17, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.28945/4082
  • Sullivan, A. Kazakoff, E. R. & Bers, M. U. (2013). The Wheels on the Bot go Round and Round: Robotics Curriculum in Pre-Kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 203-219. https://bit.ly/3LKkMAM
  • Theodoropoulou, I., Lavidas, K. & Komis, V. (2021). Results and prospects from the utilization of Educational Robotics in Greek Schools. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 28(1), 225–240. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1007/s10758-021-09555-w
  • Umam, M.U.K., Budiyanto, C. & Rahmawati, A. (26-28 de julio 2019). Literature review of robotics learning devices to facilitate the development of computational thinking in early childhood [Comunicación a Congreso]. 2nd International Conference on science, mathematics, environment, and education, Surakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139865
  • Yang, W. Davy Kit, N. & Hongyu, G. (2022a). Robot programming versus block play in early childhood education: Effects on computational thinking, sequencing ability, and self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1817–1841. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1111/bjet.13215
  • Yang, W. Haoran, L. & Jiahong, S. (2022b). Towards inclusiveness and sustainability of robot programming in early childhood: Child engagement, learning outcomes and teacher perception. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6). 1486-1510. https://doi-org.sabidi.urv.cat/10.1111/bjet.13266
  • Zilinskiene, I. (2022). Insights from Empirical Results on Robotics in Early Childhood Education: Lithuanian Case. Technology, education, Management, Informatics (TEM Journal), 11(3), 1103-1107 https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM113-15
  • Zviel-Girshin, R. Luria, A & Shaham, C. (2020). Robotics as a Tool to Enhance Technological Thinking in Early Childhood. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 294-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09815-x
Datuen iturria: Dialnet