Cómo no hacer cosas con palabras y cómo hacerlas con el silencio

  1. De Salvador Agra, Saleta 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Endoxa: Series Filosóficas

ISSN: 1133-5351

Année de publication: 2023

Número: 52

Pages: 143-162

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5944/ENDOXA.52.2023.29672 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Endoxa: Series Filosóficas

Résumé

The opposite of saying and the obstacles of saying are two meanings that unite contradiction as contra-diction. Both point to two aspects of failing to do things with words and doing things with silence. From this duality, the text addresses the phenomenon of the silencing of women within the framework of feminist speech act theory and their silences using Teresa De Lauretis’ semiological film theory. To this end, we will analyze the pragmatic conditions in context, with reference to the film scenario of Twelve Angry Men, based on the conceptual tools of contemporary feminist philosophy of language.

Références bibliographiques

  • AUSTIN, John (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Barcelona: Paidós, 1998].
  • AUSTIN, John (1970). “Performative Utterance”. Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233-252.
  • BAUER, Nancy (2019), Cómo hacer cosas con pornografía, Madrid: Cátedra.
  • BLANCO, Antonio (en prensa). “Uptake: ¿entender o aceptar?”
  • BIRD, Alexander (2002). “Illocutionary Silencing”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 83, pp. 1-15.
  • DE LAURETIS, Teresa (1987). Technologies of Gender. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • DE LAURETIS, Teresa(1999). Soggetti eccentrici, Milano: Feltrinelli.
  • DE LAURETIS, Teresa(2000). Diferencias. Madrid: horas y Horas.
  • FRICKER, Miranda (2017). Injusticia epistémica. Barcelona: Herder.
  • HORNSBY, Jennifer y LANGTON, Rae (1998). “Free Speech and Illocution”. Legal Theory, 4, pp. 21-37.
  • HORNSBY, Jennifer (1993). “Speech Act and Pornography”. Women’s Philosophy Review, 10, pp. 38-45.
  • HORNSBY, Jennifer(2000). “Feminism in Philosophy of Language: Communicative Speech Acts” In M. Fricker & Hornsby (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87-106.
  • JACOBSON, Daniel (1995). “Freedom of Speech Act? A response to Langton”. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24, pp. 64-79.
  • KUKLA, Rebecca (2014). “Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Justice”, Hypatia, 29, pp. 440-457.
  • LANGTON, Rae (1993). “Speech act and Unspeakable Acts”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, pp. 293-330.
  • MAITRA, Ishani (2004). “Silence and Responsability”. Philosophy Perspectives, 18, pp. 189-208.
  • MAITRA, Ishani (2009). “Silencing Speech”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39, pp. 309-338.
  • MACKINNON, Catharine (1993). Only words, London: Harvard University Press.
  • MCGOWAN, Mary Kate (2009). “On silencing and sexual refusal”. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, pp. 487-494.
  • RAMÍREZ, José Luís (1992). “El significado del silencio y el silencio del significado” en Castilla del Pino, C. (comp.), El silencio, Madrid: Alianza, pp. 15-45
  • SBISÀ, Marina (1976). “Speech acts e femminilità. Note sul linguaggio dei settimanali feminili”, Problemi, pp. 260-284.
  • SBISÀ, Marina(2006). “Communicating citizenship in verbal interaction. Principles of a speech act oriented discourse analysis”. In Hausendorf & Bora. (eds.), Analysing Citizenship Talk, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 151-180.
  • SBISÀ, Marina(2009). “Illocution and silencing”. en Mey, J., Turner, K. (eds.), Language in Life and a Life in Language, Bradford: Emerald, pp. 351-357.
  • WYATT, Nicole (2009). “Failing to do things words”. Southwest Philosophy Review, 25, pp. 135-142
  • SBISÀ, Marina(2013). “Naming and Refusing: Austinian approaches to Mackinnon on Silencing”. Feminist Philosophy and Pornography Symposium, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.
La source de données: Dialnet