Imaginarios en disputa

  1. Josu Larrañaga Altuna
Journal:
Accesos: prácticas artísticas y formas de conocimiento contemporáneas

ISSN: 2530-447X,  2530-4488

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 6

Pages: 146-160

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Accesos: prácticas artísticas y formas de conocimiento contemporáneas

Abstract

It seems that the conditions from which we once thought, felt, or perceived have come to a crossroads. The assumptions on which they are based are unable to interpret and respond to the confluence of problems facing us, which have lately begun to accumulate to a frightening degree. The paradigm shift is overwhelming. We are living through an immense crisis in all aspects of life, one that has acquired an increasingly evident epistemological dimension, in addition to its ontological nature. A look at the combined historical conditions that have created our language, our sense of knowledge and truth, and the questions we ask about the existence of things, reveals frictions and disagreements about the social and collective imaginaries that shape our experiences, imaginations and thoughts. These disputed imaginaries are enormously important for our very subsistence.

Bibliographic References

  • Akrich, M. y Latour, B. (1992). A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. En W. Buker y J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology-Building Society. Studies in Sociotechni¬cal Change (pp. 259-264). The MIT Press.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: realism and social cons¬tructivism without contradiction. Duke University Press.
  • Bottici, C. (2018). De la política de la imaginación a la política imagina. Te¬mas y Debates, 36, 21-39.
  • Bottici, C. (2019). Imaginal Politics: Images Beyond Imagination and the Imaginary. Columbia University Press.
  • Buckner, C. (2013) Morgan’s Canon, Meet Hume’s Dictum: Avoiding An¬thropofabulation. Cross-Species Comparisons. Biology & Philosophy, 28(5), 853-871. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16327
  • Castoriadis, C. (1991). Philosophy. Politics. Autonomy. Essays in Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
  • Castoriadis, C. (2007). La institución imaginaria de la sociedad. Tusquets.
  • Clarck, A. y Chalmers, D. (2011). La mente extendida. Cuadernos de Infor¬mación y Comunicación, 6, 17-18.
  • Clarck, A. y Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind, Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
  • Ehrenberg, A. (2004). Le sujet cérébral. Esprit, 309, 130-155.
  • Feldman, L. (2021). Siete lecciones y media sobre el cerebro (trad. F. J. Ra¬mos). Paidós Ibérica.
  • Floridi, L. (2014). El manifiesto onlife. Ser humano en la época de la hiper¬conexión. Springer Open.
  • Formosinho, J. (2022). The Many Faces of Gaia´s Response-ability. A Field Trip to the Critical Zones Digital Platform. Museum Worlds, 10(1), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2022.100114
  • Ginsberg, A. D. (2021). Pollinator Pathmaker. Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg. https://www.daisyginsberg.com/work/pollinator-pathmaker
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Femi¬nism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575- 599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthuluce¬ne. Duke University Press.
  • Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Liveli¬hood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge.
  • Ingold, T. (2018). Between Science and Art: An Atrhopological Odyssey. En S. Bergmann y F. J. Clingerman (eds.), Arts, Religion and the Environment (pp. 96-116). Brill.
  • Ingold, T. (2022). Correspondencias. Gedisa.
  • Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think, Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. University of California Press.
  • Laclau, E. (2003). Identidad y hegemonía. En J. Butler, E. Laclau y S. Zi¬zek (eds.), Contingencia, Hegemonía, Universalidad (pp. 49-94). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Lakoff, G. (2008). Puntos de reflexión. Manual del progresista. Península.
  • Latour. B. y Wëibel, P. (eds.). (2020). Critical Zones. The Science and Poli¬tics of Landing on Earth. The MIT Press.
  • Latour. B. y Wëibel, P. (eds.). (2022). Critical Zones [Catálogo de la expo¬sición en la Universidad de Arte y Diseño de Karlsruhe]. The MIT Press. https://zkm.de/media/file/en/cz_fieldbook_digital_en.pdf
  • Loriner, J. (2020). The Probiotic Planet. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Margulis, L. (1991). Symbiogenesis and Symbioticism. En L. Margulis y R. Fester (eds.), Symbiosis as a Source of EvolutionaryIinnovation (pp. 1-14). The MIT Press.
  • Margulis, L. y Sagan, D. (2002). Captando genomas. Una teoría sobre el ori¬gen de las especies (D. Sempau, trad.). Kairós.
  • Meillassoux, Q. (2015). Después de la finitud: ensayo sobre la necesidad de la contingencia. Caja Negra.
  • Pérez Parra, J. E. y Restrepo de Megía, F. (2022). Teorías cognitivas dinámicas o de tercera generación: análisis documental de artículos originales de investigación cualitativa. Diversitas, 18(1). https://doi. org/10.15332/22563067.7875
  • Shaviro, S. (2020). Sin criterios: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze y la estética (R. Suárez y L. Ralón, trads.). Open Humanities Press.
  • Schiavio, A., van der Schyff, D., Biasutti, M., Moran, N. y Parncutt, R. (2019). Instrumental Technique, Expressivity, and Communication. A Qualitative Study on Learning Music in Individual And Collective Settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, artículo 737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00737
  • Suárez, R. y Ralón L. (2020). Introducción. En S. Shaviro (aut.), Sin crite¬rios: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze y la estética (trads. R. Suárez y L. Ralón; pp. 9-13). Open Humanities Press.
  • Varela, F., Thompson, E. y Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. The MIT Press.
  • Zepke, S. (2016). Speculative Anti-Aesthetics, or, Art, Aesthetics and Phi¬losophy. https://www.academia.edu/28938208/Speculative_Anti_Aes-thetics_or_Art_Against_Itself_Again
Data source: Dialnet