Democratic equality and Rawls’s criticism of welfare state capitalism

  1. Fernández Manzano, Juan Antonio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Ethics, Politics & Society

ISSN: 2184-2582,  2184-2574

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 5

Número: 2

Páginas: 80-95

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.21814/EPS.5.2.213 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ethics, Politics & Society

Resumen

Despite the accusation of developing an abstract theory, detached from real conditions, depoliticizing, and ultimately inclined towards the status quo, Rawls did not fail to analyze, since 1971, the political-economic conditions in which his theory could become viable. The analysis of this topic concludes with the statement that the principles and ideals of his theory could not be satisfied under capitalism in any of its forms. This article discusses the possibilities of making justice as fairness compatible under a capitalist welfare state and shows that the reasons Rawls presented for denying this possibility remain perfectly valid. The difficulties of a capitalist welfare state to curb the tendencies of capitalism towards undemocratic inequality make this system unacceptable. The article defends that, although it is a noble ideal to prevent anyone from falling below a certain social minimum, the requirements of the principles of justice are much more demanding. The article concludes by defending Rawls's methodology and main arguments and shows that far from having depoliticizing effects, justice as fairness allows us to broaden the political imagination both to denounce the highly oligopolistic character of capitalist economies and to combat the ubiquitous inclination of neoliberalism towards economic efficiency as an all-encompassing value.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, E. (2013). The imperative of integration. Princeton University Press.
  • Blanco Brotons, F. (2021). El paradigma de justicia democrática. Una concepción estructural de las injusticias globales. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
  • Cast, A., & Burke, P. (2002). A theory of self-esteem. Social Forces, 80, 1041–1068. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0003
  • Forrester, K. (2021). In the shadow of justice: Postwar liberalism and the remaking of political philosophy. Princeton University Press.
  • Freeman, S. (2007). Rawls. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086605
  • Freeman, S. (2013). Property-owning democracy and the difference principle. Analyse and Kritik, 35, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0103
  • Freeman, S. (2020, September 6). Review of the book In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy by K. Forrester. Notre Dame Philosophical Review, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/in-theshadow-of-justice-postwar-liberalism-and-the-remaking-of-political-philosophy/#_edn12
  • Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245
  • Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi058
  • Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason. Remarks on John Rawls's political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil199592335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil199592335
  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
  • Mills, C. W. (2014). The racial contract. Cornell University Press.
  • Miranda-Ruche, X. (2018). Consideraciones estructurales para la intervención en salud mental: pobreza, desigualdad y cohesión social. Trabajo Social Global – Global Social Work, 8(14), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v8i14.6377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v8i14.6377
  • Murphy, L., & Nagel, T. (2002). The myth of ownership: Taxes and justice. Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195150163.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195150163.001.0001
  • Navarro, V. (2015). Bienestar insuficiente, democracia incompleta. Anagrama.
  • O’Neill, M. (2019). Power, predistribution, and social justice. Philosophy, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000482
  • Pettit, P. (2002). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press.
  • Ravecca, P., & Dauphinee, E. (2022). What is left for critique? On the perils of innocence in neoliberal times. Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10/gpfrh5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.77064
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice (1st edition). Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Belknap Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness. A restatement. Belknap Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
  • Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism (Expanded ed.) Columbia University Press.
  • Sandel, M. (1984). The procedural republic and the unencumbered self. Political Theory, 12(1), 81–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591784012001005
  • Scanlon, T. M. (2020). ¿Por qué importa la desigualdad?. Avarigani.
  • Shklar, J. N. (1990). The faces of injustice. Yale University Press.
  • Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
  • Vallier, K. (2015). A moral and economic critique of the new property-owning democrats: On behalf of a Rawlsian welfare state. Philosophical Studies, 172(2), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0303-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0303-2
  • Walzer, M. (1981). Philosophy and democracy. Political Theory, 9(3), 379–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009059178100900307
  • Weale, A. (2013). The property-owning democracy versus the welfare state. Analyse and Kritik, 35, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2013-0104
  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level. Why equality is better for everyone. Allen Lane.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet