Capacidad diagnóstica de la densidad vascular papilar y macular frente a parámetros estructurales con tomografía de coherencia óptica en el glaucoma seudoexfoliativo

  1. Noemí Güemes-Villahoz 1
  2. Barbara P. Burgos-Blasco 1
  3. José Ignacio Fernández-Vigo 1
  4. Laura Morales-Fernández 1
  5. Pilar Perez-García 1
  6. Julián García-Feijoó 1
  7. José María Martínez-De-La-Casa 1
  1. 1 Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid
    info

    Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04d0ybj29

Journal:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 98

Issue: 12

Pages: 680-686

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.OFTAL.2023.09.006 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic ability of the vessel density (VD) of the optic nerve head (ONH) and the macula on optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography and the retinal nerve layer thickness (RNFL) thickness and the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness on OCT in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG). Methods Cross-sectional study including PXG patients and healthy controls. Demographic and clinical data were noted for all participants. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) images of the ONH and macular area were obtained with the RS-3000 Advance OCT (Nidek Co., Gamagori, Japan). The RNFL and GCC thickness of different sectors was provided by the software. Macular VD of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and ONH VD of the radial peripapillary capillary plexus (RPCP) were registered. Groups were compared and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves were used to determine the power of discrimination of each parameter. Results RNFL and GCC thickness and ONH and macular VD were significantly lower in PXG patients compared with healthy controls (all, P<.05). The best discrimination parameter was the average RNFL thickness (AUROC: 0.928). ONH VD AUROC was better than that of macular VD (AUROC: 0.897 and 0.780, respectively). ONH VD AUROC was comparable to RNFL thickness (P<.001). Conclusions The diagnostic ability of ONH vessel density in PXG appears comparable to that of the structural parameters, RNFL and GCC thickness, obtained with OCT, and may be a valuable tool in clinical practice.