Politeness in Petitions Signed by Nineteenth Century British Women before being Transported to Australia

  1. Nuria Calvo Cortés
Revue:
RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 1885-9089

Année de publication: 2023

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Pages: 44-58

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada

Résumé

The development of the concept of face and the categorisation of the so-called Face Threatening Acts are rooted in some changes that British society experienced in the nineteenth century and that led to the importance of the self. This study analyses fifteen nineteenth century manuscript petition letters signed by four women in prison. The analysis is two-fold. First, it compares these petitions with the model ones presented in letter-writing manuals of the time and the politeness instruction provided in them. Second, it provides a description of the Face Threatening Acts found in the original petitions. The conclusion shows that these women probably had an awareness of politeness rules despite possibly never having read one of these manuals first-hand. It also suggests that the use of the politeness strategies analysed may have contributed to the granting of these women’s requests.

Références bibliographiques

  • Anonymous. (1721). The Young Secretary’s Guide. London: H. Tracey.
  • Anonymous. (1778). The Complete Letter Writer. Edinburgh: W. Darling.
  • Bergs, A. T. (2007). Letters: A new approach to text typology. In T. Nevalainen & S. K. Tanskanen (Eds.), Letter Writing (pp. 27-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.1.04ber
  • Brant, C. (2006). Eighteenth Century Letters and British Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Brown P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, G. (1790). The English Letter-Writer or the Whole Art of General Correspondence […] together with the Universal Petitioner. London: A. Hogg.
  • Calvo Cortés, N. (2020). Variations from letter-writing manuals: Humble petitions signed by women in Late Modern London. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Manners and their Transgressions in the History of English (pp. 184-212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.312.09nur
  • Cooke, T. (1775). The New Letter Writer […] to Which are Added the Principles of Politeness. Whitehaven: John Dunn.
  • Cooke, T. (1791). The Universal Letter-Writer or New Art of Polite Correspondence […] to which is added the Complete Petitioner. London: W. Osborne, T. Griffin and J. M. Mozley.
  • Culpeper J. & Demmen, J. (2011). Nineteenth-century English politeness. Negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of the individual self. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 12(1-2), 49-81. doi: 10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul
  • Fitzmaurice, S. M. (1998). The commerce of language in the pursuit of politeness in eighteenth‐century England. English Studies, 79(4), 309-328. doi: 10.1080/00138389808599136
  • Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213-231. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
  • Kilday, A. M. (2005). Women and crime. In H. Barker & E. Chalus (Eds.), Women’s History: Britain 1700-1850. An Introduction (pp. 174-193). London: Routledge.
  • Klein, L. E. (2002). Politeness and the interpretation of the British eighteenth century. The Historical Journal, 45(4), 869-898. doi: 10.1017/S0018246X02002716
  • Nevalainen, T. (2007). Introduction. In T. Nevalainen & S. K. Tanskanen (Eds.), Letter Writing (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Palk, D. (2007). Prisoners’ Letters to the Bank of England, 1781-1827. London: London Record Society.
  • Vickery, A. (2006). The Gentleman’s Daughter. Women’s Lives in Georgian England. London: The Folio Society.
  • Watts, R. J. (1999). Language and politeness in early eighteenth century Britain, Pragmatics, 9(1), 5-20. doi: 10.1075/prag.9.1.02wat
  • Whyman, S. E. (2009). The Pen and the People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Woodfine, P. (2006). Debtors, prisons and petitions. Eighteenth-Century Life, 30(2), 1-31. doi: 10.1215/00982601-2005-001
  • Zaret, D. (1996). Petitions and the invention of public opinion in the English revolution. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1497-1555. doi: 10.1086/230866
La source de données: Dialnet