A General Equilibrium Assessment of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement
-
1
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
info
ISSN: 1556-5068
Argitalpen urtea: 2021
Mota: Artikulua
Beste argitalpen batzuk: SSRN Electronic Journal
Laburpena
We offer a comprehensive general equilibrium analysis of the EU-Mercosur agreement considering tariffs, quotas, non-tariff measures in goods and services, as well as a usually neglected component, namely, government procurement. We use the well-known GTAP model and cover the results for 36 sectors and 9 regions (US, EU, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Canada, China and ROW). Our estimations are based on the negotiated tariffs and quotas at the HS 8-digit level and on a thorough analysis of the texts of the agreement. Our quantitative estimations for GDP, welfare, wages, aggregate trade and prizes show larger gains in countries with current high trade barriers and a stronger liberalization commitment. GDP increases are highest in Uruguay (0.61%), and lowest in Paraguay (0.04%) and of 0.13% (in Brazil) and 0.26% (in Argentina). The EU derives an 0.20% increase in wages. China and the US experience small losses in wages, capital remuneration and welfare.
Erreferentzia bibliografikoak
- A Aguiar, (2019), Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 4, pp. 1, 10.21642/JGEA.040101AF
- R Baldwin, (1992), Journal of Political Economy, 100, pp. 162, 10.1086/261811
- E Bekkers, (2017), OECD Trade Policy Papers
- J Brunsden, (2021), Financial Times
- M Burfisher, (2016), Introduction to computable general equilibrium models, 10.1017/9781316450741
- O Cadot, (2015), Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities. Research Study Series, 69
- C Carrico, (2020), Impacts of the EU-Mercosur trade agreement on the Dutch economy, 2020, 10.18174/539424
- E Corong, (2017), The Standard GTAP Model, version 7
- (2019), Retrieved from: The Agreement in Principle and its texts
- (2021), Retrieved from: Countries and regions: United States
- I Fariza, (2021), Europa cede paso a China en Mercosur
- El Pa�s
- L Fontagn�, (2008), Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series
- J Francois, (1998), Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)
- J Francois, (2013), Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment: An Economic Assessment. IDE Discussion Papers
- R Grundke, (2019), OECD Economics Department Working Papers
- G W Harrison, (2002), The World Bank Economic Review, 16, pp. 49, 10.1093/wber/16.1.49
- K Hayakawa, (2014), How Do Free Trade Agreements Reduce Tariff Rates and Non-tariff Barriers? IDE Discussion Paper No. 446. Institute of Developing Economies
- T Hertel, (2007), Economic Modelling, 24, pp. 611
- Trade International, (1980), American Economic Review, 70, pp. 950
- M C Latorre, (2018), Stopped TTIP? Its potential impact on the world and the role of neglected FDI. Economic Modelling, 71, pp. 99
- M C Latorre, (2020), Economic Modelling, 89, pp. 72, 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.10.009
- M C Latorre, (2021), 24th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis (Virtual Conference)
- M C Latorre, (2018), China Economic Review, 47, pp. 172, 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.09.002
- R Z Lawrence, (1996), China & World Economy
- M C Latorre, (2020), Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of the Association Agreement. Negotiations between the European Union and Mercosur
- M J Melitz, (2003), Econometrica, 71, pp. 1695, 10.1111/1468-0262.00467
- (2018), Acuerdo de Asociaci�n Birregional entre el Mercosur y la UE
- L Nilsson, (2018), Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 3, pp. 156, 10.21642/JGEA.030104AF
- H Nord�s, (2006), Dynamic Gains from Trade
- G Ortiz, (2019), World Economy, 43, pp. 705, 10.1111/twec.12881
- E Alvim, (2018), Effects of EU-Mercosur trade agreement on bilateral trade: the role of Brexit, MPRA Paper 103010
- F Sinabell, (2020), Implication of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement for Austria. A Preliminary Assessment
- J Timini, (2017), EU-MERCOSUR Trade Agreement: A Preliminary Analysis. International Agricultural Trade Report. Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
- J Zhou, (2014), Economic Modelling, 44, pp. S77, 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.04.030