¿Transhumanismo “contra” educación?

  1. Gaviria, José Luis 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid. España.
Revista:
Teoría de la educación

ISSN: 1130-3743

Año de publicación: 2024

Título del ejemplar: Más allá de lo humano: exploraciones posthumanistas en Teoría de la educación

Volumen: 36

Número: 2

Páginas: 1-23

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14201/TERI.31762 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Teoría de la educación

Resumen

This article argues that a "human" version of transhumanism is possible, that the elimination of physical or physiological limitations does not undermine the possibility of education, and that true education is not diminished by transhumanism. The first part presents the main currents of transhumanism, and the arguments for and against it. In the second part, from a logocentric position, it is shown that transhumanism is not incompatible with education and that there does not have to be a transgression of moral codes in it. In the end, some criteria to judge when biotechnological interventions in humans are acceptable and when they are not, are proposed.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian Ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526455
  • Besnier, J. M. (2009). Demain les posthumains. Le future a-t-il encore besoin de nous ? Hachette.
  • Bostrom, N. (Ed.). (2014). Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
  • Buchanan, A., Brock, D. W., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. (2000). From chance to choice: genetics and justice. Cambridge University Press.
  • Caplan, A. L. (2009). Good, better or best. In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (Eds.), Human Enhancement (pp. 199-209). Oxford University Press.
  • Champagne, M. (2023). My Life Gives the Moral Landscape its Relief. In Sandra L. Woien (Ed.), Sam Harris: Critical Responses, (pp. 17–38). Carus Books.
  • Coeurnelle, D. (2013). Et si on arrêtait de vieillir!: Réalité, enjeux et perspectives d'une vie en bonne santé beaucoup plus longue. FYP Éditions.
  • Coeurnelle, D., & Roux, M. (2016). TECHNOPROG - Le transhumanisme au service du progrès social. FYP Éditions. https://books.google.es/books?id=iJkuDwAAQBAJ
  • Esfandiary, F. M. (1973). Up-wingers: A Futurist Manifesto. John Day Company.
  • Falcone, A. (s/f). Le transhumanisme est-il un humanisme? Réponse à Gilbert Hottois. En Humanisme et NBIC Nanotechnologies, biologie, informatique et sciences cognitives. https://xxiemesiecle.wordpress.com/tribunes-et-recensions/le-transhumanisme-est-il-un-humanisme-reponse-a-gilbert-hottois/
  • Feinberg, J. (1980). The Child’s Right to an Open Future. In W. Aiken & H. LaFollette (Eds.). Whose Child? Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Feinberg, J. (1986). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Self. Oxford University Press.
  • Ferry, L. (2016). La Révolution Transhumaniste. Comment la Technomédicine et l’Uberisation vont Bouleverser nos vies. PLON.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar Straus & Giroux.
  • Gil Cantero, F. (2022). La Pedagogía ante el desfase prometeico del transhumanismo. Revista de Educación, 396, 11–33. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2022-396-528
  • Golfi, J. Y. (2012). Nature Humaine et amelioration de l’être humain à la lumière du programme transhumaniste. Journal International de Bioéthique, 22(3).
  • Habermas, J. (2015/2001). L’avenir de la nature humaine. Vers un eugénisme libéral? Gallimard. Trad. fr.Christian Bouchindhomme.
  • Harris, J. (2007). Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7t8vz
  • Hottois, G. (2013). Humanisme, transhumanisme, posthumanisme. Revista Colombiana de Bioética 8(2), 140-166. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=189230852011
  • Hottois, G. (2014). Le transhumanisme est-il un humanisme ? Bruxelles, Académie Royale de Belgique.
  • Hughes, J. J. (2004). Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Basic Books.
  • Jardin, E. (2018). Le transhumanisme est-il un humanisme? https://e.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZ2CA7ZED2BByiYY2zfySiDbNiJHFXdBpfX
  • Kamm, F. (2006). What is and is Not Wrong with Enhancement? KSG Working Paper No. RWP06-020, SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902372
  • Kant, I. (1785/1980). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres / M. Kant; [traducción del alemán por Manuel García Morente]. Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, 1999, Espasa-Calpe. https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/nd/ark:/59851/bmcg44m4
  • MacIntyre, A. (2017). Ética en los conflictos de la modernidad. Sobre el deseo, el razonamiento práctico y la narrativa. Madrid: Rialp.
  • Martínez de Lagran, M., Elizalde-Torrent, A., Paredes, R., Clotet, B., & Dierssen, M. (2022). Lamivudine, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor, rescues cognitive deficits in a mouse model of down syndrome. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 26(15), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17411
  • Monod, J. (1970). Le Hasard et la Nécessité: Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne, Éditions du Seuil.
  • More, M. (1998). The Extropian Principles (Version 3.0): A Transhumanist Declaration. Extropy Institute. https://web.archive.org/web/20100114100426/http://www.maxmore.com/extprn3.htm
  • Nordmann, A. (2004). Converging technologies: shaping the future of European societies. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Publications Office.
  • Overall, C. (2020). Life enhancement technologies: The significance of social category membership. In The Ethics of Sports Technologies and Human Enhancement (pp. 409-422). Routledge.
  • Puelles, A. M. (1958). Concepto de educación en Santo Tomas. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 16(64), 359–382. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23761991
  • Reyero, D., & Gil Cantero, F. (2019). La educación que limita es la que libera | Education that limits is education that frees. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 77(273), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP77-2-2019-01
  • Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.) (2002a). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. NSF-DOC Report, June.
  • Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2002b). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Integrating from the nanoscale. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4, 281-295.
  • Sandel, M. J. (2004) The case against perfection: what’s wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. The Atlantic, 292(3), 50-54, 56-60, 62.
  • Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (Eds.) (2009). Human Enhancement, Oxford University Press.
  • Schuster, J. (2022). Critique of Alien Reason: Toward a Critical Interplanetary Humanities. SubStance, 51(1), 103-119. Project MUSE, https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2022.0006
  • Taillandier, A. (2019). Lectures et langages du transhumanisme. Raisons politiques, 74, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.074.0073
  • Trigano, S. (2022) Petit manuel de postmodernisme illustré. Éditions Intervalles.
  • Vasconcellos, E. (2012). 'La naranja mecánica': lo que era, lo que fue y lo que casi nadie entendió. ABC, 14/8. https://www.abc.es/cultura/libros/abci-origen-naranja-mecanica-201208140000_noticia.html
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet