The world’s first mainly female cabinet: “The council of female ministers” in the Spanish cabinet (2018) on Twitter

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aday, S., & Devitt, J. (2001). Style over substance: Newspaper coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s presidential bid. Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics, 6(2), 52–73.
• AIMC (2018). Resumen general EGM: Abril 2017 a marzo 2018 [Summary of the General Study of Media: April 2017 till March 2018]. EGM, 1o Año Móv, 1–20.
• Amoedo, A., Vara-Miguel, A., & Negredo, S. (2018). Digital news report.es 2018. Una audiencia diversa y preocupación por la desinformación [Digital news report.es 2018. A diverse audience and the preoccupation to be disinformed]. Navarra.
• Barberá, P., & Rivero, G. (2012). Desigualdad en la discusión política en Twitter [Inequality in the political discussion on Twitter]. In Ponencia preparada para el I Congreso Internacional en Comunicación Política y Estrategias de Campaña.
• Bernal Triviño, A. I., & Congosto, M. L. (2014). Campaña electoral de las elecciones europeas: Medios de comunicación vs. viralidad de la Red [Electoral campaign of the European elections: Communication media versus virality of the net]. III Congreso internacional en comunicación política y estrategias de campaña, 24–27 September 2014, 1–20.
• Bernárdez Rodal, A. (2010). Estrategias mediáticas de “despolitización” de las mujeres en la práctica política (o de cómo no acabar nunca con la división público/privado) [Media strategies of “despolitization” of women in politics (or how to never end the public/private division)]. CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 15, 197–218. Retrieved May 5, 2019 from http://revistas.ucm.es/inf/11357991/articulos/CIYC1010110197A.pdf.
• Bernárdez Rodal, A. (2015). Mujeres en medio(s). Propuestas para analizar la comunicación masiva con perspectiva de género [Women in (between) the media. Suggestions to analyze mass communication from a gender perspective]. Madrid: Fundamentos.
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Cuestiones de sociología [Sociology in question]. Madrid: Akal.
• Braden, M. (1996). Women politicians and the media. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
• Cammaerts, B. (2005). ICT-usage among transnational social movements in the networked society – to organise, to mobilise and to debate. Media, technology and everyday life in Europe: From information to communication, 53–72.
• Candón Mena, J. I. (2011). Internet en movimiento: nuevos movimientos sociales y nuevos medios en la sociedad de la información [Internet on the move: New social movements and new media in the information society]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid – Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. Retrieved May 8, 2019 from http://eprints.ucm.es/12085/1/T32702.pdf.
• Casero-Ripollés, A. (2015). Estrategias y prácticas comunicativas del activismo político en las redes sociales en España [Communication strategies and practices of the political activism in the Spanish social media]. Historia y Comunicación Social, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2015.v20.n2.51399
• Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
• Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder [Communication and power]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
• Chomsky, N. (2002). La propaganda y la opinión pública. Conversaciones con David Barsamian [Propaganda and public mind. Onterwiees by David Barsamian]. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.
• CIS (2016). Postelectoral elecciones generales 2016 [After the general elections 2016]. Estudio no 3145. Julio 2016.
• CIS (2018). Barómetro de mayo [Barometer of May]. Madrid.
• Cobo, R. (2002). Democracia paritaria y sujeto político feminista [Democracy of co-determination and the feminist politicial idea]. Anales de La Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 36, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
• Congosto, M., Basanta-Val, P., & Sanchez-Fernandez, L. (2017). T-Hoarder: A framework to process Twitter data streams. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 83, 28–39.
• Congosto, M., Fernández, M., & Moro, E. (2011). Twitter y política: información, opinión y ¿predicción? [Twitter and politics: Information, opinion, and prediction?] Cuadernos de Comunicación Evoca, 4, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.3028
• Costello, M., Jenkins, J. C., & Aly, H. (2015). Bread, justice, or opportunity? The determinants of the arab awakening protests. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.002
• Crespi, I. (2000). El proceso de opinión pública. Cómo habla la gente [The process of public opinion. How the people talk]. Madrid: Ariel Comunicación.
• Criado, J. I., Martínez-Fuentes, G., & Silván, A. (2013). Twitter en campaña: las elecciones municipales españolas de 2011 [Campaigning on Twitter: The Spanish municipal elections 2011]. Rips, 12, 93–113. https://doi.org/10.15304/rips.12.1.1307
• Dahlgren, P. (2012). Mejorar la participación: la democracia y el cambiante entorno de la web [Improving participation: Democracy in the changing environment of the web]. In D. Champeau, & S. Innenarity (Ed.), Internet y el futuro de la democracia (pp. 45–67). Barcelona: Paidós.
• Dokuka, S., Valeeva, D., & Yudkevich, M. (2017). Homophily evolution in online networks: Who is a good friend and when? In D. I. Ignatov (Ed.), Analysis of images, social networks and texts. 5th International conference, AIST 2016. Yekaterinburg, Russia, April 7–9, 2016. Revised selected papers (pp. 91–99). Moscow: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52920-2
• Echeverría, J. (2012). ¿Democracia en internet? [Democracy on the internet?] In Internet y el futuro de la democracia (pp. 179–199). Barcelona: Paidós.
• Elías, C. (2018). Activismo y comunicación en la era digital: ¿Perjudican las redes sociales la movilización ciudadana? [Activism and communication in the digital era: Do social networks harm citizens’ mobilization?] Iono 14R, 16(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1126
• Elliott, C., & Stead, V. (2018). Constructing women’s leadership representation in the UK press during a time of financial crisis: Gender capitals and dialectical tensions. Organization Studies, 39(I), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617708002
• Enguix Oliver, S. (2017). Impacto político e informativo de las redes sociales: esferas de actuación y comparación con los medios [Political and informative impact of social media: Fields of action and comparison with the media]. Anàlisi, 56, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3090
• European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2759/0156
• Fridkin, K. L. (2016). Introduction. Politics & Gender, 12(02), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000313
• Gómez-Escalonilla, G., García, A., Santín, M., Rodríguez, R., & Torregrosa, J. (2008). La imagen de la mujer política en los medios de comunicación [The image of the political woman in the media]. Feminismo/S, 11, 59–71.
• Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2017). The personal in the political on Twitter: Towards a typology of politicians’ personalized tweeting behaviours. In J. Schwanholz, T. Graham, & P. T. Stoll (Eds.), Managing democracy in the digital age: Internet regulation, social media use, and online civic engagement (pp. 1–270). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61708-4
• Gutiérrez-Coba, L. (2013). Ahora sí, la comunicación [And now: communication]. Palabra Clave. Retrieved from http://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/3041/3081
• Hajnal, P. I. (Ed.) (2002). Civil society in the information age. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Hampton, K. N., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the “Spiral of Silence”. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC. Retrieved May 9, 2019 from http://www.pewinternet.org/topics/Dating.aspx?typeFilter=5
• IAB (2019). Estudio anual de Redes Sociales 2019 [Annual study of social networks 2019] (vol. 2019). Retrieved May 10, 2019 from https://iabspain.es/estudio/estudio-anual-de-redes-sociales-2019-version-reducida/
• Jalalzai, F. (2013). Shattered, cracked, or firmly intact? Women and the executive glass ceiling worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Jiang, Y. (2014). “Reversed agenda-setting effects” in China. Case studies of Weibo trending topics and the effects on state-owned media in China. The Journal of International Communication, 20(2), 168–183.
• Jónasdóttir, A. G. (1988). On the concept of interest, women’s interests, and the limitation of interest theory. In K. B. Jones, & A. G. Jónasdóttir (Eds.), The political interest of gender: Developing theory and research with a feminist face (pp. 33–65). London: Sage.
• Kahn, F. K. (1992). Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of US senate candidates. The Journal of Politics, 54(2), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132036
• Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Kahn, F., & Goldenberg, E. N. (1991). Women candidates in the news: An examination of gender differences in US senate campaign coverage. The Public Opinion Quartely, 55(2), 180–199.
• Kitchens, K. E., & Swers, M. L. (2016). Why aren’t there more Republican women in Congress? Gender, partisanship, and fundraising support in the 2010 and 2012 elections. Politics and Gender, 12(4), 648–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1600009X
• Lachover, E. (2017). Signs of change in media representation of women in Israeli politics: Leading and peripheral women contenders. Journalism, 18(4), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915610991
• Liu, S. J. S., & Banaszak, L. A. (2017). Do government positions held by women matter? A cross-national examination of female ministers’ impacts on women’s political participation. Politics and Gender, 13(1), 132–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000490
• Lovenduski, J., & Norris, P. (Eds.) (1993). Gender and party politics. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
• Marañón Lazcano, F., Maeda González, C. M., & Saldierna Salas, A. R. (2018). La mujer política en Twitter : análisis de los mensajes emitidos por las candidatas a gubernaturas en México [The policial women on Twitter: Analysis of the messages by the female candidates and governors in Mexico]. Revista de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación En Comunicación, 16, 71–92. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2018.16.5
• Menéndez Menéndez, M. I. (2013). Medios de comunicación, género e identidad [Media, gender, and identity]. In C. Díaz Martínez, & S. Dema Moreno (Ed.), Sociología y Género (pp. 253–271). Madrid: Tecnos.
• Mislove, A., Lehmann Jørgensen, S., Ahn, Y.-Y., Onnela, J.-P., & Rosenquist, J. N. (2011). Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 554–557).
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2008). Cracking the marble ceiling: Cultural barriers facing women leaders. Harvard University Report, 857. Retrieved May 5, 2019 from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/Marble ceiling professional format.pdf.
• Parmelee, J., & Bichard, S. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
• Pessoa do Amaral, M. E., & Arias Neto, J. M. (2017). Perversão e política no impeachment de Dilma Rousseff [Perversion and politics in the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff]. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 135, 55–70.
• Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ramos-Serrano, M., Fernández Gómez, J. D., & Pineda, A. (2018). ‘Follow the closing of the campaign on streaming’: The use of Twitter by Spanish political parties during the 2014 European elections. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730
• Resina de la Fuente, J. (2010). Ciberpolítica, redes sociales y nuevas movilizaciones en España: el impacto digital en los procesos de deliberación y participación ciudadana [Cyberpolitics, social networks, and new mobilizations in Spain: The digital impact on deliberation processes and civic participation]. Mediaciones Sociales, 7, 143–164.
• Sung-Tae, K., & Young-Hwan, L. (2007). New functions of internet mediated agenda-setting: Agenda-rippling and reversed agenda-setting. Korea Journalism Review, 1(2), 3–29.
• Valcárcel, A. (2008). La política de las mujeres [The politics of women]. Madrid: Feminismos. Cátedra.
• Valiente, C., Ramiro, L., & Morales, L. (2003). Mujeres en el Parlamento: un análisis de las desigualdades de género en el Congreso de los Diputados [Women in parliament: An analysis of the gender inequalities in the House of Deputies]. Revista de Estudios Politicos, 121, 179–208. Retrieved May 5, 2019 from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=740728
• Van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (2004). Cyberprotest. New media, citizens and social movements. London: Routledge.
• Verge Mestre, T. (2006). Mujer y partidos politicos en España: las estrategias de los partidos y su impacto institucional, 1978–2004 [Women and political parties in Spain: The strategies of the parties and their institutional impact]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 115, 165–196.
• Yaqub, U., Chun, S. A., Atluri, V., & Vaidya, J. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on Twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001
• Yardi, S., & Boyd, D. (1999). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Response, 1205–1207.
• Zugasti Azagra, R. (2015). La interacción política en Twitter: el caso de @ppopular y @ahorapodemos durante la campaña para las Elecciones Europeas de 2014 [Political interaction on Twitter: The case of @ppopular and @ahorapodemos (@nowwecan) during the campaigns for the European elections 2014]. Ambitos: Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 28, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2016.12.12