Sobre la posición de la negaciónla estructura < no + participio >
- Fábregas, Antonio 1
- González Rodríguez, Raquel 2
- 1 Norges teknisk-naturvetenskapliga universitet (NTNU)
-
2
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
info
ISSN: 1136-3169
Année de publication: 2024
Número: 30
Pages: 101-129
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Philologica canariensia
Résumé
This paper studies the structure in which negation precedes a participle, following the scheme < no + participle >; specifically, we establish the conditions under which that sequence is possible. We argue that there are two requirements that determine the possibility of having that construction: on the one hand, the participle must contain verbal structure and, specifically, the projection corresponding to the causative subevent; on the other hand, negation must not interfere between the heads that form the participle. The second condition allows us to understand why < no + participle > is possible in the nominal domain, but not in verbal periphrases. The first one accounts for the fact that not all participial forms that modify a noun accept the anteposition of no.
Références bibliographiques
- ACKERMAN, F., STUMP, G. T., y WEBELHUTH, G. (2011). Lexicalism, periphrasis, and implicative morphology. En B. Borsley y K. Borjars (eds.), Non-transformational theories of grammar (pp. 325-358). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395037.ch9.
- ALARCOS, E. (1949). Sobre la estructura del verbo español. Boletín de la Biblioteca Menéndez Pelayo, 25, 50-83.
- ALEXIADOU, A., y ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, E. (2008). Structuring participles. En C. Chang y H. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 33-41). Cascadilla. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/26/paper1653.pdf.
- ALEXIADOU, A., ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, E, y SCHÄFER, F. (2015). External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001.
- ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, E. (2003). Participles and voice. En A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert y A. von Stechow (eds.), Perfect explorations (pp. 1-37). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902358.1.
- ARKADIEV, P. (2015). Negative events: Evidence from Lithuanian. En P. Arkadiev, I. Kapitonov, Y. Lander, E. Rakhilina y S. Tatevosov (eds.), Donum semanticum: Opera linguistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discipulis amicisque Rossicis oblate (pp. 7-20). LRC.
- ARMSTRONG, G. (2017). Spanish participios activos are adjectival antipassives. The Linguistic Review, 34(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2016-0007.
- BALLY, C. (1944). Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Presses universitaires de France.
- BARWISE, J. (1981). Scenes and other situations. The Journal of Philosophy, 78(7), 369-397. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2026481.
- BEARD, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. SUNY.
- BORGONOVO, C. (1999). Participios activos. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica, 47(2), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v47i2.2102.
- BORIK, O., y GEHRKE, B. (2019). Participles: Form, use and meaning. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1055.
- BOSQUE, I. (1990). Sobre el aspecto en los adjetivos y en los participios. En I. Bosque (ed.), Tiempo y aspecto en español (pp. 177-214). Cátedra.
- BOSQUE, I. (1999). El sintagma adjetival. Modificadores y complementos del adjetivo. Adjetivo y participio. En I. Bosque y V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 217-310). Espasa Calpe.
- BOSQUE, I. (2014). On resultative past participles in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 13, 41-77. https://raco.cat/index.php/CatalanJournal/article/view/292441/380975.
- BRUCART, J. M.ª, y XIQUÉS, T. M.ª (2018). Some issues about the perfect. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 17, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.243.
- BRUENING, B. (2014). Word formation is syntactic: adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32(2), 363-422.
- CAHA, P. (2009). The nanosyntax of case [Tesis doctoral, University of Tromsø]. UiT Munin. https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/2203/thesis.pdf?sequence=1.
- CASALICCHIO, J. (2019). Gerunds become prepositional infinitives in Romance Small Clauses: the effects of later Merge to the syntactic spine. Probus, 31(1), 75-117. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2019-0003.
- DAVIDSON, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. En N. Resher (ed.), The logic of decision and action (pp. 81-95). University of Pittsburgh.
- DAVIDSON, D. (1969). The individuation of events. En N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel (pp. 216-234). Reidel.
- DE CLERCQ, K. (2013). A unified syntax of negation [Tesis doctoral, Universiteit Gent]. Academic Bibliography. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4215769.
- DE SWART, H. (1992). Intervention effects, monotonicity and scope. En C. Barker y D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 2 (pp. 387-406). The Ohio State University.
- DE SWART, H. (1996). Meaning and use of not…until. Journal of Semantics, 13(3), 221-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/13.3.221.
- DE SWART, H., y MOLENDIJK, A. (1999). Negation and the temporal structure of narrative discourse. Journal of Semantics, 16(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/16.1.1.
- DI TULLIO, Á. (2008). Participios y adjetivos. En M. J. Rodríguez Espiñeira y J. Pena Seijas (coords.), Categorización lingüística y límites intercategoriales (pp. 95-125). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
- EMBICK, D. (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), 355-392. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4179282?seq=1.
- FÁBREGAS, A., y GONZÁLEZ RODRÍGUEZ, R. (2017). Una nota sobre la compatibilidad entre interrogativas y negación. Verba. Anuario Galego de Filoloxía, 44, 507-526. https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.44.2837.
- FÁBREGAS, A., y GONZÁLEZ RODRÍGUEZ, R. (2019). Perífrasis e inductores negativos: un análisis en términos de dominios. Onomázein, (43), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.43.10.
- FÁBREGAS, A., y GONZÁLEZ RODRÍGUEZ, R. (2020). On inhibited eventualities. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 38(3), 729-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09461-y.
- FÁBREGAS, A., y GONZÁLEZ RODRÍGUEZ, R. (2022). Negation with participles. Linguistic Analysis, 43(1-2), 11-40.
- FOX, D., y HACKL, M. (2006). The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(5), 537–586.
- GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ, L. (dir.). (2006). Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Gredos.
- GARCÍA LORENTE, M.ª J. (2014). “No escrito”, “no escribiendo”, “sin escribir”. Formas de negar el gerundio y el participio en español [Trabajo de Fin de Máster no publicado]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
- GARCÍA-PARDO, A., y MARÍN, R. (2021). Passives of Spanish subject-experiencer psychological verbs are adjectival passives. Probus, 34(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2021-0009.
- GEHRKE, B. (2012). Passive states. En V. Demonte y L. McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure (pp. 185-211). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0008.
- GEHRKE, B. (2013). Still puzzled by adjectival passives? En R. Folli, C. Sevdali y R. Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits (pp. 175-191). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0010.
- GEHRKE, B. (2015). Adjectival participles, event kind modification and pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(3), 897-938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9295-7.
- HALLE, M., y MARANTZ, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. En K. Hale y S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20 (pp. 111-176). MIT.
- HIGGINBOTHAM, J. (1983). The logic of perceptual reports: an extensional alternative to situation semantics. Journal of Philosophy, 80(2), 100-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026237.
- HIGGINBOTHAM, J. (2000). On events in linguistic semantics. En J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi y A. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events (pp. 49-79). Oxford University.
- KRATZER, A. (2000). Building statives. En L. J. Conathan, J. Good, D. Kavitskaya, A. B. Wulf y A. C. L. Yu (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. BLS 26: General Session and Parasession on Aspect (pp. 385-399). Linguistic Society of America. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v26i1.1131.
- LAKA MUGARZA, M. I. (1990). Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections [Tesis doctoral, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/laka90.pdf.
- LASNIK, H. (1981). Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study. En N. Hornstein y D. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 152-173). Longman.
- LEVIN, B., y RAPPAPORT, M. (1986). The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(4), 623-661. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178511.
- MAIENBORN, C. (2005). On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: the case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 275-316.
- MARÍN, R. (1997). Participios con aspecto de adjetivos: entre la diacronía y la morfología. Moenia, 3, 365-376. https://minerva.usc.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10347/5927/pg_367-378_moenia3.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
- MARÍN, R. (2000). El componente aspectual de la predicación [Tesis doctoral. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona]. TDX. https://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/4856#page=1.
- MARÍN, R. (2009). Del participio al adjetivo. En E. de Miguel, S. U. Sánchez Jiménez, A. Serradilla Castaño, R.-A. Radulescu y O. Batiukova (eds.), Fronteras de un diccionario: Las palabras en movimiento (pp. 327-348). Cilengua.
- MASULLO, P. J. (2008). The syntax-lexical interface. Prepositionalizing motion verbs in Spanish [Manuscrito]. University of Pittsburgh.
- MCINTYRE, A. (2013). Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. En A. Alexiadou & F. Schäfer (eds.), Non-canonical passives (pp. 21-42). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.205.02mci.
- MURIUNGI, P. K. (2008). Phrasal movement inside Bantu verbs: Deriving affix scope and order in Kîîtharaka [Tesis doctoral, University of Tromsø]. UiT Munin. https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/1720/thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
- PAVÓN LUCERO, M.ª V., y SUÑER GRATACÓS, A. (2017). Usos locativos de ‘según’ y ‘conforme’. Cuadernos AISPI, (10), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.14672/10.2017.1326.
- PRZEPIÓRKOWSKI, A. (1999). On negative eventualities, negative concord, and negative yes/no questions. En T. Matthews y D. Strolovitc (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9 (pp. 237-254). Linguistic Society of America. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2828.
- REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA Y ASOCIACIÓN DE ACADEMIAS DE LA LENGUA ESPAÑOLA. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Espasa Calpe.
- RAMCHAND, G. (2008). First phase syntax. Cambridge University.
- RAMCHAND, G. (2018). Situations and syntactic structures. MIT.
- RAMCHAND, G., y SVENONIUS, P. (2014). Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences, 46(B), 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013.
- STARKE, M. (2001). Movement dissolves into merge: A theory of locality [Tesis doctoral, Université de Genève]. MIT. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/starke-diss.pdf.
- SZABOLCSI, A., y ZWARTS, F. (1997). Weak Islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. En A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of scope taking (pp. 217–262). Kluwer.
- TRAVIS, L. D. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation [Tesis doctoral, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/travis84.pdf.
- VARELA, S. (2008). Las categorías híbridas: comparación entre dos tipos de análisis. En M. J. Rodríguez Espiñeira y J. Pena (eds.), Categorización lingüística y límites intercategoriales (pp. 89-98). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
- WASOW, T. (1977). Transformations and the lexicon. En P. W. Culicover, T. W. Wasow y A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 327-360). Academic.
- WILTSCHKO, M. (2014). The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899.